[rt-users] Re: Recommended configuration for a stable working RT3deployment

[Autrijus Tang]

On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 11:07:05AM -0600, Jim Rowan wrote:
> I'll second that.  I have been watching all the noise on the list about
> RH, (seems like particularly RH9) but didn't want to fan the OS wars
> flame.  Our experience with FreeBSD 4.8 (now 4.9) and Postgres 7.3 has
> been extremely smooth and stable.  We're currently on 3.06.

Being the author/maintainer of said FreeBSD ports, I'd also like
to second that.

All our production level RT servers run FreeBSD4 + MySQL; most of my
clients also run FreeBSD 4/5 + (Pg|MySQL) -- the rest of them are on
Win32, due mostly to inertia. ;)

Thanks,
/Autrijus/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-users/attachments/20031126/282ff8d5/attachment.sig>