[rt-users] Final Reply (not Comment) on Resolve Patch?
Roedel, Mark
MarkRoedel at letu.edu
Wed Dec 22 13:27:20 EST 2004
Maybe your system is working different than mine...
On my system, when you "Resolve" the ticket, there's a dropdown a few
lines above the "Message:" field labeled "Update Type:" which defaults
to "Comments (Not sent to requestors)", but which can be changed to
"Reply to requestors."
We took the step on our system of changing the default from Comment to
Reply. We did this by copying share/html/Ticket/Elements/Tabs to
local/html/Ticket/Elements/Tabs and then changing "Action=Comment" to
"Action=Respond" in line 154 of the local copy.
--
Mark Roedel
Web Programmer / Analyst
LeTourneau University
-----Original Message-----
From: rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com
[mailto:rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Mike
Conley
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 12:04 PM
To: Andy Harrison
Cc: rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: RE: [rt-users] Final Reply (not Comment) on Resolve Patch?
Yes, this works fine on that page. It is possible I just have a bad
idea of what the normal workflow for handling a ticket is, but generally
people "Take" a ticket, go back and forth with the requestor for a while
(Ticket/Update page), and then "Resolve" the ticket. The page you end
up on when you hit "Resolve" has a field called "Message:" but this is
really a comment and not a message sent back to the requestor when the
ticket is resolved. We end up with a lot of resolved tickets but with
users that didn't get the final message such as "I've put the document
you wanted in \\foo\bar\doc.txt" -- it is a little confusing.
-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Harrison [mailto:aharrison at gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 9:15 AM
To: Mike Conley
Cc: rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: Re: [rt-users] Final Reply (not Comment) on Resolve Patch?
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 10:30:02 -0800, Mike Conley <conley at kana.com> wrote:
> On resolve, there is space given for entering one last comment, but
> people always seem to assume this is sent to the requestor. Wouldn't
it
> be better to have a field for sending mail (the more common case) than
a
> comment (a rarer case at least for us).
>
> Of course, maybe it would be best to have both or the option of
setting
> things up one way or another. If the field is blank, naturally you
> wouldn't want to send anything.
>
> If someone has patches for this (I know about the e-mail last comment
on
> resolve patch-- not quite the same thing) that would be great.
Maybe I don't understand what you want. This sounds exactly like what
the Update Type field is for on the Ticket/Update page.
--
Andy Harrison
_______________________________________________
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
Be sure to check out the RT wiki at http://wiki.bestpractical.com
More information about the rt-users
mailing list