[rt-users] Back to mod_perl?

[Ruslan U. Zakirov]

Mike White wrote:
> 
> Now that it's generally agreed that the attachment corruption issue has 
> been solved, i'm wondering if i should go back to mod_perl from FastCGI. 
>   Do you think mod_perl is faster?
Don't know really(I use mp1), but wish to know too.
> 
> Ideally, even, i'd like to use a single install of Apache 2.0 from RPMs 
> rather than a custom-compiled Apache 1.3.29.  Has mod_perl 2.x reached 
> any level of stability wrt RT yet?
mp2 from Distributors still suck.
Make your own Apache1 rpm spec.
> 
> Thanks,
> mike
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
> 
> Have you read the FAQ? The RT FAQ Manager lives at http://fsck.com/rtfm