[rt-users] Is RT's syslog facility "RT" (as in RT.info, RT.warn, etc)?
Adolfo Santiago
mailbag at anothernet.com
Tue Feb 17 14:12:48 EST 2004
What I meant to say was a separate log just for that facility, not create a
new facility. Sorry about the confusion.
I have separate logs for each of the facilities. For example:
/var/log/kernel
/var/log/user
/var/log/local7
/var/log/mail (this is a common facility-specific log file)
I wanted to know which facility RT was logging to so I could "tail" that log
file. Another posted indicated the facility used by RT is "user", so now I
keep an eye on my brand new RT installation by "tail -f /var/log/user".
Chago
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com
> [mailto:rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com]On Behalf Of Sean Perry
> Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 2:07 PM
> To: rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
> Subject: Re: [rt-users] Is RT's syslog facility "RT" (as in RT.info,
> RT.warn, etc)?
>
>
> Adolfo Santiago wrote:
>
> > Is RT's syslog facility "RT" (as in RT.info, RT.warn, etc)?
> >
> > I need to know in order to set up a dedicated syslog log...
> >
>
> defining a new syslog facility is not trivial. You have to inform the
> syslog daemon(s) involved about the new facility. This means if you
> have a syslog system you need to update it as well.
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Have you read the FAQ? The RT FAQ Manager lives at http://fsck.com/rtfm
>
> ** CRM114 Whitelisted by: lists.bestpractical.com **
>
More information about the rt-users
mailing list