[rt-users] RT 3.0.8
Mike Frazer
Michael.Frazer at InterCept.Net
Mon Jan 5 11:21:25 EST 2004
One last thing to keep in mind: remember to restart Apache. It seems pretty
automatic to do that anyway, but I once upgraded to 3.0.6 on a development
system before my morning coffee and spent about 2 hours trying to figure out
why it was still running on 3.0.2. :)
-----Original Message-----
From: Todd Chapman [mailto:rt at chaka.net]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 10:24 AM
To: John Schubert
Cc: RT Users
Subject: Re: [rt-users] RT 3.0.8
Upgrading is mentioned in the README.
5b FOR UPGRADING: (Within the RT 3.0.x series)
Read through the UPGRADING document included in this distribution.
It may contain important instructions for updating your database
As root, type:
make install (replace "make" with the local name for
Make, if you need to)
This will build new binaries, config files and libraries without
overwriting your RT database.
It may then instruct you to update your RT system database objects
Also, there is an UPGRADING document.
-Todd
>
> Jesse,
> Thanks for the great work and the update. I'm new to RT (relatively) so
> I'm curious about the procedure for upgrading. I took a look at the TAR
> file and see a bunch of changes to /sbin and /lib files, however it
> extracts to a rt-3-0-8 directory. Since the standard, default install
> directory is /opt/rt3, what's the preferred method of installation? I
> did look for a README and the RT docs on the website but didn't see
> anything that could be applied.
>
> Just a suggestion, but maybe with RT4 we could go to a directory
> structure where each version resides in it's own directory and then a
> sym link from the base directory (root or opt?) takes you to the most
> recent
>
> e.g.
>
> [john at localhost rt3]$ ls -l
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 1024 Nov 2 rt1
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 1024 Dec 3 rt2
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 1024 Jan 2 rt3
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 1024 Jan 31 rt3.0.8
> lrwxrwxrwx 2 root root 1024 Jan 31 rt -> rt3.0.8
>
> My apologies if this is already possible and I'm just not savy (or
> awake) enough to figure it out. I like this method because if an upgrade
> goes awry, it's easy and fast to back out by changing the sym link back.
>
> John
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Have you read the FAQ? The RT FAQ Manager lives at http://fsck.com/rtfm
_______________________________________________
rt-users mailing list
rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
http://lists.bestpractical.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
Have you read the FAQ? The RT FAQ Manager lives at http://fsck.com/rtfm
More information about the rt-users
mailing list