[rt-users] Package permissions

[Peter Jamriško]

If you unpack 3.0.9 or 3.0.8. or 3.0.6 version of RT, you will see no x 
flag in any file under /sbin directory. Only in rt 3.0.10 there are 
files in /sbin directory with x flag already set. May be ./configure 
script does just reverse change of x flag and not change from "non-x" to 
"x". It means that if I run ./configure, it will only change x flag for 
files "rt-setup-database" and "rt-test-dependencies" from "x" to 
"non-x". Size and file names of all the files under /sbin will be the 
same as befor "./configure".

Is there anybody who can just unpack rt-3.0.10 and run ./configure  and 
then try to check file permission on "/sbin/rt-test-dependencies" fiel, 
if it has "x" flag?

Thanks.
Peter

Ruslan U. Zakirov wrote:

> Peter Jamriško wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I ungzipped, untarred the rt-3.0.10.tar.gz file, then i ran 
>> "./configure --with-db-port=3306 --with-web-user=apache 
>> --with-web-group=apache". Then i tried to run "perl 
>> sbin/rt-test-dependencies --with-mysql --with-fastcgi", but there is 
>> not execute permission on the "rt-test-dependencies" file. I 
>> downloaded rt-3.0.9.tar.gz (3.0.8 too)and unpacked them. In this 
>> packages are the same files, but with reverse execute permissions. Is 
>> this ok, or do i have to run "rt-test-dependencies.in" instead.
>
> You don't want to run *.in files. If your `rt-test-dependencies.in` 
> has x flag but rt-test-dependencies has no then something wrong with 
> configure script because it should preserve permissions when do 
> *.in->* convertion.
>
>             Best regards, Ruslan.
>
>>
>> Thanks for help.
>>
>> Peter.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>>
>> RT Developer and Administrator training is coming to LA, DC and 
>> Frankfurt this spring and summer.
>> http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html
>>
>> Sign up early, as class space is limited.
>
>