[rt-users] Perl upgrade Broke my RT!
Rich West
Rich.West at wesmo.com
Thu Jul 28 15:14:11 EDT 2005
Sorry for the delay on this one.. I got sidetracked. Thank goodness for
the standalone_httpd option as that bought me some time!
Running Apache 2.0.52 w/ mod_perl 1.99 and perl 5.8.5.
All I did was upgrade a couple of perl modules (unfortunately) to
experiment with an app called "relaydelay" to assist in combatting spam
(including spam to our RT instances). The app is working wonderfully..
unfortunately, the upgrade perl modules caused the Apache->RT hooks to
break.
-Rich
Steven E. Ames wrote:
>Also keep in mind that if you rebuild mod_perl2 (not mod_perl) after your perl upgrade make sure your still using an old mod_perl2 (1.99). When mod_perl2 became 2.0 several weeks ago the API changed and won't work with RT at present.
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com
>>[mailto:rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com]On Behalf Of Phil
>>Homewood
>>Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 12:02 AM
>>To: rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
>>Subject: Re: [rt-users] Perl upgrade Broke my RT!
>>
>>
>>Rich West wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Anyhow, I'm now running the standalone_httpd since I cannot
>>>
>>>
>>seem to get
>>
>>
>>>Apache to display (using mod_perl) the site any longer. :(
>>>
>>>I'd prefer to use Apache because it is threaded and already had the
>>>mechanism in place to handle all of the load, but I'm not getting
>>>anything logged anywhere, and I simply get a "Zero Sized Reply".
>>>
>>>
>>Make sure all your perl modules are up to date, as seen
>>by your new perl binary ('make testdeps"); then rebuild
>>mod_perl against that.
>>--
>>
More information about the rt-users
mailing list