[rt-users] Custom Fields lost after update
Hugues Lepesant
hlepesant at veepee.com
Wed May 25 10:55:56 EDT 2005
Hello,
I have the same problem.
I've deleted all file in var/mason_data and it changed nothing.
Best regards,
Hugues
Drew Barnes a écrit :
>
> Chris Black wrote:
>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> But I did read the README and I did do all of that.
>>
>> Any other ideas?
>>
>> Thanks.
>> Cj B
>>
>>
> I would empty /opt/rt3/var/mason_data. That has bit me everytime I move
> a test box up to 3.4.x.
>
> DB
>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com on behalf of Rejo Zenger
>> Sent: Tue 5/24/2005 4:19 PM
>> To: rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
>> Subject: Re: [rt-users] Custom Fields lost after update
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> ++ 24/05/05 00:20 -0700 - Chris Black:
>>
>>
>>> I recently updated my installation of RT from 3.2.2 to 3.4.1 and now
>>> none of my custom fields show up. All the information looks like it's
>>> still in the database, and they work for the root user, but not of any
>>> of the other users.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Probably, you should read the README file. It says:
>>
>> | 5b FOR UPGRADING: (Within the RT 3.x series)
>> | | Read through the UPGRADING document included in this
>> distribution.
>> | It may contain important instructions which will help you
>> upgrade
>> | RT safely.
>> | | As root, type:
>> | make upgrade
>> | | This will build new binaries, config files and libraries
>> without
>> | overwriting your RT database.
>> | | You may also need to update RT's database. To find out,
>> type:
>> | | ls etc/upgrade
>> | | For each item in that directory whose name is greater than
>> | your previously installed RT version, run:
>> | /opt/rt3/sbin/rt-setup-database --action schema \
>> | --datadir etc/upgrade/<version>
>> | /opt/rt3/sbin/rt-setup-database --action acl \
>> | --datadir etc/upgrade/<version>
>> | /opt/rt3/sbin/rt-setup-database --action insert \
>> | --datadir etc/upgrade/<version>
>> | | Some of these commands will generate errors related to
>> missing files.
>> | That just means that no action was needed.
>>
>> I guess this will solve your problem.
>>
>>
>> - -- Rejo Zenger <rejo at rz.xs4all.nl> - http://rejo.zenger.nl - PGP
>> 0x75FC50F3
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
>>
>> iD8DBQFCk7aEHa9Q5nX8UPMRAs1YAJwPVhBDV35HMnKMXNMpPrZXV1+d1gCeIH+j
>> Xy7iW0ykPBZ0qkwlktlVTn4=
>> =WasY
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> _______________________________________________
>> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>>
>> Be sure to check out the RT Wiki at http://wiki.bestpractical.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>>
>> Be sure to check out the RT Wiki at http://wiki.bestpractical.com
>>
>>
>
More information about the rt-users
mailing list