[rt-users] rt-3.4.4 and mod_perl2

[Steven E. Ames]

Ah. Forgot. You also have to remove thisline from the Makefile:

CONFIGURE_ARGS+=        --no-prompts

That'll do it. It works for me anyway.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven E. Ames 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 2:18 PM
> To: 'Myra Chachkin'; rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
> Subject: RE: [rt-users] rt-3.4.4 and mod_perl2
> 
> 
> The problem is with Mason (www/p5-HTML-Mason). The version in 
> ports is 1.28 and you need at least 1.30 to play (preferably 
> 1.3101). The quick and dirty way would be to do this:
> 
> 1. edit www/p5-HTML-Mason/Makefile. Change version from 1.28 
> to 1.3101.
> 2. Remove www/p5-HTML-Mason/distinfo
> 3. install it.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com
> > [mailto:rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com]On Behalf Of Myra
> > Chachkin
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 12:57 PM
> > To: rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
> > Subject: [rt-users] rt-3.4.4 and mod_perl2
> > 
> > 
> > Hi RT folks,
> > 
> > Does anyone have rt-3.4.4 working with apache2 and mod_perl2 
> > (mod_perl2-2.0.1, not 1.99)?  I'm attempting an upgrade and I'm 
> > a bit stumped.  I got the latest 5.4-stable FreeBSD and rebuilt 
> > everything successfully, including rt-3.4.4.  But on starting 
> > httpd, I see this error in the apache log:
> > 
> > [error] Can't locate Apache2.pm in @INC (@INC contains [snip])
> > at 
> > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7/HTML/Mason/ApacheHandler.
> > pm line 270.\nBEGIN failed--compilation aborted at 
> > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7/HTML/Mason/ApacheHandler.
> > pm line 281.\nCompilation failed in require at 
> > /usr/local/rt3/lib/RT/Interface/Web/Handler.pm line 
> > 146.\nCompilation failed in require at (eval 177) line 1.\n
> > [error] Can't load Perl file: /usr/local/rt3/bin/webmux.pl
> > 
> > So, in HTML::Mason::ApacheHandler.pm, here's the problem spot:
> > 
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > use constant APACHE2    => $mod_perl::VERSION >= 1.99;
> > use constant OK         => 0;
> > use constant DECLINED   => -1;
> > use constant NOT_FOUND  => 404;
> > use constant REDIRECT   => 302;
> > 
> > BEGIN {
> >         if (APACHE2) {
> >                 require Apache2;
> >                 Apache2->import();
> >                 require Apache::RequestRec;
> >                 require Apache::RequestIO;
> >                 require Apache::ServerUtil;
> >                 require Apache::Log;
> >                 require APR::Table;
> >         } else {
> >                 require Apache;
> >                 Apache->import();
> >         }
> > }
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > I thought that after the mod_perl "great renaming" API change with 
> > mod_perl 2.x, the "require Apache2" is obsolete and the 
> Apache::x and 
> > other modules are being ported to the new API and renamed 
> > Apache2::x.  
> > I have this directory in my perl @INC: 
> >   /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7/mach/ 
> > But, there's no Apache2.pm in there, of course; just an Apache2 
> > directory containing all the individual modules in the new 
> Apache2::x
> > namespace (Const.pm, etc).
> > 
> > So, the ApacheHandler.pm code looks to me like it only works 
> > for people 
> > running 1.99 MP2 and using "use Apache2" and "use Apache::compat".  
> > Has Mason not been fully ported to mod_perl2.x?  I don't 
> see how this
> > can be, sincE rt-3.4.4 is supposed to support mod_perl2.x 
> now.  What 
> > am I misunderstanding?
> > 
> > Here's the mod_perl documentation that says to remove "use Apache2":
> >   http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/rename.html
> > 
> > Also, I did see these threads on rt-users:
> >   
> > http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-users/2005-August/
> 033087.html
>   
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-users/2005-August/
033467.html
  http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-users/2005-July/032445.html

but haven't seen anybody saying that it's working.  Is it possible?

Thanks in advance,
Myra
_______________________________________________
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Be sure to check out the RT Wiki at http://wiki.bestpractical.com

Buy your copy of our new book, RT Essentials, today! 

Download a free sample chapter from http://rtbook.bestpractical.com