[rt-users] performance question

[Ruslan Zakirov]

forgot patch

On 12/6/06, Ruslan Zakirov <ruslan.zakirov at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/30/06, Filip Rembialkowski <filip.rembialkowski at eo.pl> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > >
> > > That sounds surprisingly high. But you're also testing with
> > > an...older RT. And I know we've made some big performance
> > > improvements since then. I can't guarantee that we've fixed whatever
> > > you're running into, but coming up to 3.4.6 or 3.6 is strongly
> > > recommended.
> > >
> > >
> > actually i discovered this while evaluating RT 3.6.1 :)
> > I was talking about 3.4.1, because the results are very similar.
> >
> > to be precise, I made this test again, just for a single home page view,
> > and have posted SQL log for single home page view here:
> > http://depesz.com/various/rt-3.6.1-homepage-view-sql-log.html
> > if you look at this, you will know what I mean
> Thanks for great report and good representation. Could you spend some
> time and write instructions about how to create such report? :)
>
> >
> > so the question is still valid.
> > is it needed to ask all these queries?
> > can we optimize it somehow?
> yep, at least get rid of the second line in your log. try attached
> patch. don't forget to purge mason cache.
>
> >
> > greets,
> > Filip
> >
> >
>
> --
> Best regards, Ruslan.
>


-- 
Best regards, Ruslan.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 3.6-queue_summary_performance.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 719 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-users/attachments/20061206/6f35925b/attachment.bin>