[rt-users] RT For an ISP

Mustafa Badawi mustafa.badawi at gmail.com
Wed Feb 22 03:51:14 EST 2006


Thanks for your reply.

Actually I was wondering if this could be done by configuring RT itself. It
would be more secure that way. If it is not configurable through RT I think
this would be a major drawback! It would be much more professional if my
clients logon to a self services portal and use it to send their tickets.
Having RT automatically create new users as watchers each time a client uses
a new name/email in the requestor field is nonsense! Moreover, the user gets
an error saying that he has no permissions to view the ticket since I have
only given the requestor the permission to view the ticket and in our case,
the requestor is not the person logged on to RT because he used another
name/email in the requestor field. I might have perceived the system wrongly
but this is the conclusion I came up with. If anyone has other ideas please
let me know.


Mustafa Badawi

On 2/21/06, Ben Robson <ben.robson at classicblue.com.au> wrote:
>
>  This link might be of help:
> http://www.htmlhelp.com/reference/html40/forms/input.html
>
> You should be able to (and note I havn't checked this at all) modify the
> code that shows the ticket creation form and set the READONLY flag on the
> <INPUT> box for the Requestor.
>
> That way the requestor, autofilled, gets displayed, but the user can't
> edit it.
>
> The other way would be to edit the same code, just don't display the
> $ticket->requestor (not actual syntax) value in a pre-completed <INPUT> box,
> just display it as text instead.
>
> So if the code said <INPUT NAME=requestor VALUE=$ticket->requestor>
> change this to just be <B>$ticket->requestor</B> thus removing the ability
> to change the value.
>
> BenR
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com on behalf of Jason Fenner
> *Sent:* Wed 22/02/2006 2:31 AM
> *To:* Mustafa Badawi
> *Cc:* rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
> *Subject:* Re: [rt-users] RT For an ISP
>
>  Have you found a fix for this yet?
>
> Mustafa Badawi wrote:
>
> >Dear All
> >
> >I am trying to use RT for my dialup clients. I only want my clients to
> use
> >the web interface to create tickets and not the email interface. I have
> >created an unprivileged RT account for each of my users. The problem I
> have
> >is that when the user logs on and selects the queue I have provided
> he/she
> >can enter any value in the requestor field thus automatically creating a
> new
> >user as a watcher. The rightful requestor of the ticket (the account I
> have
> >created) cannot actually view the new ticket because he/she has no
> >permission to view it.
> >Is there a way of forcing the requestor to be the RT account I have
> already
> >created! Keeping in mind that I do not want users seeing all the tickets
> in
> >the queue - only their own tickets.
> >Any hints would be greatly appreciated
> >
> >Mustafa Badawi
> >
> >
> >
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> > http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
> >
> >Be sure to check out the RT Wiki at http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> >
> >Download a free sample chapter of RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media at
> http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
> >
> >WE'RE COMING TO YOUR TOWN SOON - RT Training in Amsterdam, Boston and
> >San Francisco - Find out more at
> http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Be sure to check out the RT Wiki at http://wiki.bestpractical.com
>
> Download a free sample chapter of RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media at
> http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>
> WE'RE COMING TO YOUR TOWN SOON - RT Training in Amsterdam, Boston and
> San Francisco - Find out more at
> http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html
>
> ............................................................................................................................
>
> This email (including all attachments) is intended solely for the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. If you receive it in error, please let us know by reply email, do not disclose any information contained in it, delete it from your system and destroy any copies. This email is also subject to copyright. No part of it should be reproduced, adapted or transmitted without the written consent of the copyright owner. Emails may be interfered with, may contain computer viruses or other defects and may not be successfully replicated on other systems.
>
>
> We give no warranties in relation to these matters. If you have any doubts about the authenticity of an email purportedly sent by us, please contact us immediately.  Privacy - Please be aware that information provided in response to this email may contain personal information, which Classic Blue may collect, and use for the purposes of marketing information technology products and services to you.  For further information regarding Classic Blue's privacy policies please refer to
> www.classicblue.com.au
> ............................................................................................................................
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-users/attachments/20060222/4fb984ff/attachment.htm>


More information about the rt-users mailing list