[rt-users] LDAP working, now the next step

[Jay Vlavianos]

Yeah, its not the mappings at all.  It is the permissions for the
directory.  Unlike slapd or 2000 AD, 2003 requires an account that had
read permission on the directory server for binding.  You can either
hack 2003 AD to allow anonymous access, or create a user to do it. 

 

-Jay

 

 

________________________________

From: rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com
[mailto:rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Drew
Taylor
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 12:01 PM
To: eric.valor at daimlerchrysler.com; rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: RE: [rt-users] LDAP working, now the next step

 

Eric,

Thanks for the note. I have Active directory LDAP working here at $work,
but I don't know if it's 2000 or 2003. Good to know that MS didn't make
it more difficult if you upgrade. :-)

 

Drew

 

________________________________

From: eric.valor at daimlerchrysler.com
[mailto:eric.valor at daimlerchrysler.com] 
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 2:04 PM
To: rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
Cc: Drew Taylor
Subject: Re: [rt-users] LDAP working, now the next step


Drew: 

I tested against 2000 and 2003 with ldapsearch before posting those
settings to http://wiki.bestpractical.com/index.cgi?LdapAttrMap.  The
mapping is the same for both. 

--
Eric N. Valor
Information Technology Manager
DaimlerChrysler Research & Technology North America, Inc.
eric.valor at daimlerchrysler.com
1510 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, CA 94304
CIMS 931-00-00
650-845-2536

: This Space Intentionally Left Blank : 



Jay,
Please update the Wiki with the Windows 2003 AD information if you
haven't already done so. I'm curious how your mapping differs from that
on http://wiki.bestpractical.com/index.cgi?LdapSiteConfigSettings.

Drew




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-users/attachments/20060720/46e6a0a0/attachment.htm>