From je_mi_re at yahoo.com Thu Jun 1 05:04:37 2006
From: je_mi_re at yahoo.com (guppy rules)
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 02:04:37 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [rt-users] newbie needs help
Message-ID: <20060601090437.97669.qmail@web38407.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Hi,
I tried to install rt-3.4.5 on Fedora Core 4, but I need some help.
I have Apache 2.0.54 and mod_perl-2.0.1-1.fc4 running.
Apache runs, but when I tried to configure this for RT, I don't see anything.
Here's my apache config:
Alias /rt "/bigdisk/www/html/rt"
PerlModule Apache::DBI
PerlRequire /usr/local/rt3/bin/webmux.pl
AllowOverride All
Options ExecCGI FollowSymLinks
Order allow,deny
Allow from all
RewriteEngine On
RedirectMatch permanent (.*)/$ $1/index.html
AddDefaultCharset UTF-8
SetHandler perl-script
PerlHandler RT::Mason
What do I wrong? I'am new with apache and mod_perl, please give me some advice. I don't know what to do.
Thanks.
Remi
---------------------------------
Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great rates starting at 1?/min.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From roydepp at gmail.com Thu Jun 1 07:57:52 2006
From: roydepp at gmail.com (Roy Depp)
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 13:57:52 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] BCC on reply is not recorded in ticket history
Message-ID:
Hi,
When replying to a ticket and adding BCCs, RT does not record the BCC
addresses in ticket history.
Is it possible to enable BCC recording in ticket history the same way CC
is recorded?
--Roy
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From ruslan.zakirov at gmail.com Thu Jun 1 08:55:46 2006
From: ruslan.zakirov at gmail.com (Ruslan Zakirov)
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 16:55:46 +0400
Subject: [rt-users] weird Slow SelectOwner query
In-Reply-To: <200603291143.19318.laas.toom@eenet.ee>
References: <200603281114.58908.laas.toom@eenet.ee>
<589c94400603280801x3542f661tfd81ba18b8bedd0a@mail.gmail.com>
<200603291143.19318.laas.toom@eenet.ee>
Message-ID: <589c94400606010555j55a94d35ob32d07ccad774ba8@mail.gmail.com>
I've investigated more on this problem and found out that this problem
of mysql as couldn't optimize well some queries when it's possible, I
know how to hack a workaround and help RDBMs optimize it, but later...
-EHAVENOTIME
On 3/29/06, Laas Toom wrote:
> Tuesday 28 March 2006 7:01 pm Ruslan Zakirov wrote:
> > Could you show full explain for the query?
>
> Unfortunately (or fortunately ;-) the query now is planned differently than,
> when I began testing yesterday so I can not give you the very first explain
> output, where the 'main' table was joined in first and which took 8 sec to
> complete.
>
> But below are two different EXPLAINs which I can get right now.
> (Use fixed-font to view these tabels, but I also included URLs for screenshots
> of the same tables)
>
> 1) The way this query is run now on our server. This query takes 1.5 sec to
> complete and after some runs gets even faster (caching probably).
>
> http://www3.eenet.ee/~laas/explain_select_owners_1.png
>
> SQL query:
> EXPLAIN SELECT DISTINCT main.* FROM Users main, Principals Principals_1, ACL
> ACL_2, CachedGroupMembers CachedGroupMembers_3 WHERE ((ACL_2.PrincipalId =
> CachedGroupMembers_3.GroupId)) AND ((ACL_2.PrincipalType = 'Group')) AND
> ((ACL_2.RightName = 'OwnTicket')) AND ((CachedGroupMembers_3.MemberId =
> Principals_1.id)) AND ((Principals_1.Disabled = '0')) AND
> ((Principals_1.PrincipalType = 'User')) AND ((Principals_1.id != '1')) AND
> ((main.id = Principals_1.id)) AND ((ACL_2.ObjectType = 'RT::Ticket' AND
> ACL_2.ObjectId = 1365) OR (ACL_2.ObjectType = 'RT::Queue' AND ACL_2.ObjectId =
> 8) OR (ACL_2.ObjectType = 'RT::System')) ORDER BY main.Name ASC;
>
> EXPLAIN:
> id select_ table type possible_ key key_ ref rows Extra
> type keys len
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 1 SIMPLE ACL_2 range ACL1 ACL1 85 NULL 7 Using where;
> Using index;
> Using
> temporary;
> Using filesort
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 1 SIMPLE main range PRIMARY, PRIMARY 4 NULL 9259 Using where
> Users3
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 1 SIMPLE Princi eq_ref PRIMARY PRIMARY 4 rt3. 1 Using where;
> pals_1 main.id Distinct
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 1 SIMPLE Cached ref DisGrouMem GrouMem 10 rt3.ACL_2. 1 Using where;
> Group GrouMem PrincipalId, Using index;
> Members_3 MemberId_idx rt3.main.id Distinct
>
>
> 2) The same query, but I have put the 'Users main' table to the last position
> in the FROM statement. This query is fast (0.0032 sec) from the beginning (as
> can be concluded by the small number of rows involved in this).
>
> http://www3.eenet.ee/~laas/explain_select_owners_2.png
>
> SQL query:
> EXPLAIN SELECT DISTINCT main.* FROM Principals Principals_1, ACL ACL_2,
> CachedGroupMembers CachedGroupMembers_3, Users main WHERE ((ACL_2.PrincipalId
> = CachedGroupMembers_3.GroupId)) AND ((ACL_2.PrincipalType = 'Group')) AND
> ((ACL_2.RightName = 'OwnTicket')) AND ((CachedGroupMembers_3.MemberId =
> Principals_1.id)) AND ((Principals_1.Disabled = '0')) AND
> ((Principals_1.PrincipalType = 'User')) AND ((Principals_1.id != '1')) AND
> ((main.id = Principals_1.id)) AND ((ACL_2.ObjectType = 'RT::Ticket' AND
> ACL_2.ObjectId = 1365) OR (ACL_2.ObjectType = 'RT::Queue' AND ACL_2.ObjectId
> = 8) OR (ACL_2.ObjectType = 'RT::System')) ORDER BY main.Name ASC;
>
> EXPLAIN:
> id select_ table type possible_ key key_ ref rows Extra
> type keys len
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 1 SIMPLE ACL_2 range ACL1 ACL1 85 NULL 7 Using where;
> Using
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 1 SIMPLE Cached ref DisGrouMem, GrouMem 5 rt3.ACL_2. 4 Using where;
> Group GrouMem, PrincipalId Using index
> Members_3 MemberId_idx
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 1 SIMPLE main eq_ref PRIMARY, PRIMARY 4 rt3.CachedG 1
> Users3
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 1 SIMPLE Princ eq_ref PRIMARY PRIMARY 4 rt3.main.id 1 Using where;
> ipals_1 Distinct
>
>
> Best regards,
> Laas Toom
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
>
>
> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>
>
> We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical: http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
>
--
Best regards, Ruslan.
From romain.degez at smartjog.com Thu Jun 1 10:48:50 2006
From: romain.degez at smartjog.com (Romain DEGEZ)
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 16:48:50 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] Auto add attachements as Custom Field (binary) in scrips
Message-ID: <447EFE52.90605@smartjog.com>
Hello list,
I made some search but I can't figure out how to set a custom field (a "upload
file" one) with the mail attachement when auto-creating a ticket upon mail
reception via rt-mailgate.
Thanks,
--
RD
From romain.degez at smartjog.com Thu Jun 1 10:50:10 2006
From: romain.degez at smartjog.com (Romain DEGEZ)
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 16:50:10 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] Auto add attachements as Custom Field (binary) in scrips
Message-ID: <447EFEA2.60704@smartjog.com>
Hello list,
I made some search but I can't figure out how to set a custom field (a "upload
file" one) with the mail attachement when auto-creating a ticket upon mail
reception via rt-mailgate.
Thanks,
--
RD
From romain.degez at smartjog.com Thu Jun 1 11:12:32 2006
From: romain.degez at smartjog.com (Romain DEGEZ)
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 17:12:32 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] Auto add attachements as Custom Field (binary) in
scrips
In-Reply-To: <447EFEA2.60704@smartjog.com>
References: <447EFEA2.60704@smartjog.com>
Message-ID: <447F03E0.2090601@smartjog.com>
[...]
Oops
Sorry for the double-post, I thought I made a mistake in the list mail address
but both are working..
--
RD
From brendanarnold at gmail.com Thu Jun 1 11:41:29 2006
From: brendanarnold at gmail.com (Brendan Arnold)
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 16:41:29 +0100
Subject: [rt-users] Lack of trailing slash causing porblems in IE
In-Reply-To: <5ed41c130605220229v616dc65bu87e9b8a9c9592cfe@mail.gmail.com>
References:
<5ed41c130605220229v616dc65bu87e9b8a9c9592cfe@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5ed41c130606010841l1a106e01r3b20bff47e7ab08f@mail.gmail.com>
I have tried changing the primary DNS hostname to that on our SSL
certificate, however this has had no effect.
I have just come across this article in the MS Knowledge base which
may be of some help. I am going to try disabling SSL 3.0 connections
as a result.
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=305217
I will keep you posted as to progress.
Brendan
From mikef at ack.Berkeley.EDU Thu Jun 1 11:46:17 2006
From: mikef at ack.Berkeley.EDU (Mike Friedman)
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 08:46:17 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [rt-users] " Merge failed. Couldn't set Status" - after upgrade
to 3.4.5
In-Reply-To: <447DDD8D.1050204@uclink.berkeley.edu>
References: <447DDD8D.1050204@uclink.berkeley.edu>
Message-ID: <20060601083002.M12692@malcolm.berkeley.edu>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 31 May 2006 at 11:16 (-0700), Mike Patterson wrote:
> We noticed a bug with RT 3.4.5 after our upgrade, which could be an
> indicator of an "inconsistent database".
>
> When we attempted to merge one ticket into another we go this message
> "Merge failed. Couldn't set Status"
>
> It turns out that both of the tickets were already set to "resolved".
> After we switched the status to "open" we were able to merge the tickets
> (then we switched the merged ticket back to resolved).
I have noticed this on 3.4.2 as well. I've written a perl script (using
the RT API) that allows merging two tickets from the command line (I don't
like using the supplied 'rt' CLI command). When I got the above error
message, I looked into the RT code and found that a ticket to be merged
into another is first changed to 'resolved' status (I don't know why).
If the status is already 'resolved', this results in an error message.
I don't know why setting a status to the same value that's currently set
should be considered an error; this has been a problem for me in other
script-writing contexts, where I always have to check for this case before
invoking the SetStatus method, lest I get a spurious error code. But I
think this is really part of a broader problem of how error codes are set
in RT API methods (i.e., any error just returns 0, so a script can't tell
what kind of error it was).
So, my merge script now has to check first if the status is 'resolved';
if so, set it to 'open' and then merge it. If the merge fails for some
reason, I set the status back to 'resolved', but only if that's what it
was originally.
I can see how this problem can be quite annoying when using the Web UI,
since it means an additional manual step of 'unresolving' the ticket
first, as you've discovered.
> We verified that our accounts have "ModifyTicket" rights and also
> checked tried this as root.
I don't believe this has anything to do with rights. For some reason, RT
just decides to set status to 'resolved' as part of the merge process.
> When I tested on our old box (RT 3.2.2), merging resolved tickets wasn't
> a problem.
I guess this started with some version after 3.2.2!
Mike
_____________________________________________________________________
Mike Friedman System and Network Security
mikef at ack.Berkeley.EDU 2484 Shattuck Avenue
1-510-642-1410 University of California at Berkeley
http://ack.Berkeley.EDU/~mikef http://security.berkeley.edu
_____________________________________________________________________
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8
iQA/AwUBRH8Lza0bf1iNr4mCEQKGKwCgveuY50TlGQN4xcMIfNz2FZc36pMAoLWS
FJLeW/A/Fxi2xLfJqNHyuTXs
=Izfa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From ted at serreyn.com Thu Jun 1 12:29:24 2006
From: ted at serreyn.com (Ted Serreyn)
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 11:29:24 -0500
Subject: [rt-users] binary attachment corruption?
In-Reply-To: <447D882E.1010206@ucrwcu.rwc.uc.edu>
Message-ID: <008201c68598$8bb02d60$0e14140a@ad.serreyn.com>
That is how I tested, and no it didn't help.
--
Ted Serreyn Phone: 262-432-0260 Fax: 262-432-0232
Serreyn Network Services, LLC http://www.serreyn.com/
-----Original Message-----
From: Drew Barnes [mailto:barnesaw at ucrwcu.rwc.uc.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 7:13 AM
To: Ted Serreyn
Cc: rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: Re: [rt-users] binary attachment corruption?
I suspect existing binary attachments are broken beyond repair. Have
you tried running mysql with binary as the default character set and
sending in a ticket with a new attachment?
Ted Serreyn wrote:
> I wish the fix was that simple, but changing the default charset on mysql,
> then restarting it, does not fix the problem. I agree that this is
looking
> more and more like some kind of issue between mysql and rt and agreeing on
> what charset things are in.
>
>
>
>
--
Drew Barnes
Applications Analyst
Raymond Walters College
University of Cincinnati
From ted at serreyn.com Thu Jun 1 12:32:10 2006
From: ted at serreyn.com (Ted Serreyn)
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 11:32:10 -0500
Subject: [rt-users] binary attachment corruption?
In-Reply-To: <447CA534.2010709@ucrwcu.rwc.uc.edu>
Message-ID: <008301c68598$ee4154e0$0e14140a@ad.serreyn.com>
Interesting
mysqldump --all-databases --with-default-charset=binary >dump.test
mysqldump: unknown variable 'with-default-charset=binary'
# mysqldump --version
mysqldump Ver 10.9 Distrib 4.1.19, for pc-linux-gnu (i686)
So I guess that idea don't work.
--
Ted Serreyn Phone: 262-432-0260 Fax: 262-432-0232
Serreyn Network Services, LLC http://www.serreyn.com/
-----Original Message-----
From: rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com
[mailto:rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Drew Barnes
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 3:04 PM
To: Covington, Chris
Cc: rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: Re: [rt-users] binary attachment corruption?
Jesse may have inadvertently touched on this in his response. It looks
like your default character set is utf8, but Jesse suggested doing dumps
with --with-default-charset=binary. Hmmm....2+2= ___ maybe? Anyone
tried setting
[mysqld]
character-set-server = binary
and reporting back?
But I'm still using an old mysql, so I'm not real sure-like.
Covington, Chris wrote:
> On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:30:48AM -0500, Ted Serreyn wrote:
>
>> In my case it is an existing rt installation, that has started to
experience
>> this problem I believe since the mysql upgrade. New attachments sent in
are
>> always corrupted (ok only the binary ones).
>>
>
> I am having the same problem w/4.1.19. Bueller?
>
> ---
> Chris Covington
> IT
> Plus One Health Management
> 75 Maiden Lane Suite 801
> NY, NY 10038
> 646-312-6269
> http://www.plusoneactive.com
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
>
>
> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>
>
> We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical:
http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
>
--
Drew Barnes
Applications Analyst
Raymond Walters College
University of Cincinnati
_______________________________________________
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical:
http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
From jesse at bestpractical.com Thu Jun 1 12:34:32 2006
From: jesse at bestpractical.com (Jesse Vincent)
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 12:34:32 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] binary attachment corruption?
In-Reply-To: <008301c68598$ee4154e0$0e14140a@ad.serreyn.com>
References: <447CA534.2010709@ucrwcu.rwc.uc.edu>
<008301c68598$ee4154e0$0e14140a@ad.serreyn.com>
Message-ID: <20060601163432.GF8022@bestpractical.com>
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 11:32:10AM -0500, Ted Serreyn wrote:
> Interesting
>
>
> mysqldump --all-databases --with-default-charset=binary >dump.test
> mysqldump: unknown variable 'with-default-charset=binary'
>
My mistake. --default-character-set=name
> # mysqldump --version
> mysqldump Ver 10.9 Distrib 4.1.19, for pc-linux-gnu (i686)
>
> So I guess that idea don't work.
> --
> Ted Serreyn Phone: 262-432-0260 Fax: 262-432-0232
> Serreyn Network Services, LLC http://www.serreyn.com/
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com
> [mailto:rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Drew Barnes
> Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 3:04 PM
> To: Covington, Chris
> Cc: rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
> Subject: Re: [rt-users] binary attachment corruption?
>
> Jesse may have inadvertently touched on this in his response. It looks
> like your default character set is utf8, but Jesse suggested doing dumps
> with --with-default-charset=binary. Hmmm....2+2= ___ maybe? Anyone
> tried setting
> [mysqld]
> character-set-server = binary
> and reporting back?
>
> But I'm still using an old mysql, so I'm not real sure-like.
>
>
> Covington, Chris wrote:
> > On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:30:48AM -0500, Ted Serreyn wrote:
> >
> >> In my case it is an existing rt installation, that has started to
> experience
> >> this problem I believe since the mysql upgrade. New attachments sent in
> are
> >> always corrupted (ok only the binary ones).
> >>
> >
> > I am having the same problem w/4.1.19. Bueller?
> >
> > ---
> > Chris Covington
> > IT
> > Plus One Health Management
> > 75 Maiden Lane Suite 801
> > NY, NY 10038
> > 646-312-6269
> > http://www.plusoneactive.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
> >
> > Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> > Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
> >
> >
> > Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> > Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
> >
> >
> > We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical:
> http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
> >
>
> --
> Drew Barnes
> Applications Analyst
> Raymond Walters College
> University of Cincinnati
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
>
>
> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>
>
> We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical:
> http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
>
>
> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>
>
> We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical: http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
>
--
From ted at serreyn.com Thu Jun 1 12:33:18 2006
From: ted at serreyn.com (Ted Serreyn)
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 11:33:18 -0500
Subject: [rt-users] binary attachment corruption?
In-Reply-To: <008201c68598$8bb02d60$0e14140a@ad.serreyn.com>
Message-ID: <008401c68599$16bf8ae0$0e14140a@ad.serreyn.com>
Ouch, RTFM, --with-default-character-set=binary is the correct syntax.
--
Ted Serreyn Phone: 262-432-0260 Fax: 262-432-0232
Serreyn Network Services, LLC http://www.serreyn.com/
-----Original Message-----
From: rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com
[mailto:rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Ted Serreyn
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 11:29 AM
To: 'Drew Barnes'
Cc: rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: RE: [rt-users] binary attachment corruption?
That is how I tested, and no it didn't help.
--
Ted Serreyn Phone: 262-432-0260 Fax: 262-432-0232
Serreyn Network Services, LLC http://www.serreyn.com/
-----Original Message-----
From: Drew Barnes [mailto:barnesaw at ucrwcu.rwc.uc.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 7:13 AM
To: Ted Serreyn
Cc: rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: Re: [rt-users] binary attachment corruption?
I suspect existing binary attachments are broken beyond repair. Have
you tried running mysql with binary as the default character set and
sending in a ticket with a new attachment?
Ted Serreyn wrote:
> I wish the fix was that simple, but changing the default charset on mysql,
> then restarting it, does not fix the problem. I agree that this is
looking
> more and more like some kind of issue between mysql and rt and agreeing on
> what charset things are in.
>
>
>
>
--
Drew Barnes
Applications Analyst
Raymond Walters College
University of Cincinnati
_______________________________________________
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical:
http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
From jesse at bestpractical.com Thu Jun 1 12:47:24 2006
From: jesse at bestpractical.com (Jesse Vincent)
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 12:47:24 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] BCC on reply is not recorded in ticket history
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID: <20060601164724.GI8022@bestpractical.com>
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 01:57:52PM +0200, Roy Depp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When replying to a ticket and adding BCCs, RT does not record the BCC
> addresses in ticket history.
> Is it possible to enable BCC recording in ticket history the same way CC
> is recorded?
It's recorded. (And you can see it in the copy RT saves and sends out)
lib/RT/Attachment_Overlay.pm sub Headers is the mentod you'd need to
change.
>
> --Roy
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
>
>
> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>
>
> We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical: http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
--
From KFCrocker at lbl.gov Thu Jun 1 12:53:02 2006
From: KFCrocker at lbl.gov (Kenneth Crocker)
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 09:53:02 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] RE: Confused by Custom field rights
In-Reply-To: <58B1112F0EEB7349AE14A0AA46F9CEC00137ABAE@szexchange.Shopzilla.inc>
References: <58B1112F0EEB7349AE14A0AA46F9CEC00137ABAE@szexchange.Shopzilla.inc>
Message-ID: <447F1B6E.5060102@lbl.gov>
Philip Kime wrote:
> Perfect, this works, thanks. It still seems to be a bit strange that
> Custom fields aren't considered part of a ticket/asset for the
> ModifyTicket/ModifyAsset rights ...
>
> PK
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joshua Colson [mailto:jcolson at voidgate.org]
> Sent: 30 May 2006 13:17
> To: Philip Kime
> Cc: RT users
> Subject: Re: [rt-users] Confused by Custom field rights
>
>
> Create a group for each set of users (if you haven't already) and assign
> the ModifyCustomField right for each individual custom field to the
> group. Use RTx::RightsMatrix to make it easier.
>
> HTH
>
> --
> Joshua Colson
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
>
>
> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>
>
> We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical: http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
>
>
>
Philip,
Actually, since it only makes sense to give privileges to groups and
then add users to groups (that way you are not continually doing the
same redundant work for every user you want to get to a Queue and you
don't have tons of users' rights to maintain) it also makes sense to do
the same thing for custom fields. If a GROUP has certain rights to a
Queue (set up in configuration) and a Custom field can be applied to any
number of Queues, it allows more flexibility to also require group
access to a custom field, because you may have more than 1 group
accessing a Queue and one group you may WANT to modify custom fields and
another you don't. Does that make sense?
Kenn
From pkime at Shopzilla.com Thu Jun 1 12:54:16 2006
From: pkime at Shopzilla.com (Philip Kime)
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 09:54:16 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] RE: Confused by Custom field rights
Message-ID: <58B1112F0EEB7349AE14A0AA46F9CEC00137ABB8@szexchange.Shopzilla.inc>
Actually, you're quite right - I hadn't factored in that CFs can be
applied to different Queues.
PK
-----Original Message-----
From: Kenneth Crocker [mailto:KFCrocker at lbl.gov]
Sent: 01 June 2006 09:53
To: Philip Kime
Cc: Joshua Colson; RT users
Subject: Re: [rt-users] RE: Confused by Custom field rights
Philip Kime wrote:
> Perfect, this works, thanks. It still seems to be a bit strange that
> Custom fields aren't considered part of a ticket/asset for the
> ModifyTicket/ModifyAsset rights ...
>
> PK
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joshua Colson [mailto:jcolson at voidgate.org]
> Sent: 30 May 2006 13:17
> To: Philip Kime
> Cc: RT users
> Subject: Re: [rt-users] Confused by Custom field rights
>
>
> Create a group for each set of users (if you haven't already) and
> assign the ModifyCustomField right for each individual custom field to
> the group. Use RTx::RightsMatrix to make it easier.
>
> HTH
>
> --
> Joshua Colson
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com Commercial support:
> sales at bestpractical.com
>
>
> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>
>
> We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical:
> http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
>
>
>
Philip,
Actually, since it only makes sense to give privileges to groups and
then add users to groups (that way you are not continually doing the
same redundant work for every user you want to get to a Queue and you
don't have tons of users' rights to maintain) it also makes sense to do
the same thing for custom fields. If a GROUP has certain rights to a
Queue (set up in configuration) and a Custom field can be applied to any
number of Queues, it allows more flexibility to also require group
access to a custom field, because you may have more than 1 group
accessing a Queue and one group you may WANT to modify custom fields and
another you don't. Does that make sense?
Kenn
From skirk at insomniacgames.com Thu Jun 1 12:58:58 2006
From: skirk at insomniacgames.com (Steve Kirk)
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 09:58:58 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] Problem with Autoreply template
In-Reply-To: <589c94400605271748t120bd6ebjdd6ac514f0dd520e@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <514005087A4DA54CB81C428C81EAB93D01E8F073@EXCHANGE.insomniacgames.com>
I'm following the wiki's advice here:
http://wiki.bestpractical.com/index.cgi?UniqueAutoReplies ("the easy
way")
It picks up the new template, but always fails, logging the following
error:
RT: error: couldn't parse head; error near: Thanks for emailing
info at insomniacgames.com.
(/usr/local/rt3/lib/RT/Template_Overlay.pm:369)
It always has this parse error on the first line of the template body,
no matter the content.
I've deleted that template, and re-created it several times. I've
changed the text into many various iterations, from the full body (which
I'd like to have) down to as simple as "hi" - it always gives the parse
error.
I've even gone as far as to create a completely blank template, named
Autoreply, no description, no body-text, and the error is still logged.
If I delete the template altogether, the global template is picked up &
used perfectly fine.
I should note I've created a custom Resolved template for this same
queue and it works fine. I almost want to say it feels like it's
something specific to 'Autoreply'.
Any ideas on what I can look at? I've not seen (going back to July'05)
anything in the archives that would seem to talk about this.
Thanks!
Steve Kirk
IT Group
Insomniac Games
From admin at fouks.net Thu Jun 1 12:54:54 2006
From: admin at fouks.net (Jason Fouks)
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 11:54:54 -0500
Subject: [rt-users] RT on Mac OS X Server 10.4
Message-ID:
I am running 10.4.6 on a test box. I am trying to get the PERL
modules built but it seems to fail every time which means I can't get
the RT program running. Has anyone had success with getting the PERL
modules built and have step by step directions as to how to get RT
built on a brand new 10.4.6 OS X Server?
Thanks much,
Jason
From KFCrocker at lbl.gov Thu Jun 1 13:17:34 2006
From: KFCrocker at lbl.gov (Kenneth Crocker)
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 10:17:34 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] " Merge failed. Couldn't set Status" - after upgrade
to 3.4.5
In-Reply-To: <447DDD8D.1050204@uclink.berkeley.edu>
References: <447DDD8D.1050204@uclink.berkeley.edu>
Message-ID: <447F212E.9070407@lbl.gov>
Mike Patterson wrote:
> We noticed a bug with RT 3.4.5 after our upgrade, which could be an
> indicator of an "inconsistent database".
>
> When we attempted to merge one ticket into another we go this message
> "Merge failed. Couldn't set Status"
>
> It turns out that both of the tickets were already set to "resolved".
> After we switched the status to "open" we were able to merge the
> tickets (then we switched the merged ticket back to resolved).
>
> We verified that our accounts have "ModifyTicket" rights and also
> checked tried this as root.
>
> Looking at our rt.log file we saw this message:
> [Wed May 31 17:45:01 2006] [error]: RT::Ticket=HASH(0xa70c0ec)
> couldn't set status to resolved. RT's Database may be inconsistent.
> (/usr/local/rt3/lib/RT/Ticket_Overlay.pm:2730)
>
> When I tested on our old box (RT 3.2.2), merging resolved tickets
> wasn't a problem.
>
> Any one else experiencing this or have suggestions on what I can do
> about it?
>
> I migrated from:
> FreeBSD 4.11, RT 3.2.2, MySQL 4.1.7, Apache 1.3.33, Perl 5.8.4,
> mod_perl-1.29, DBI-1.42_1
> --TO-->
> RHEL 4.3, RT 3.4.5, MySQL 4.1.2-3, Apache 2.0.52, Perl 5.8.5,
> mod_fastcgi-2.4.2, DBI-1.40-8
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
>
Mike,
To be honest, I can't see that as a problem. I thought the whole
point of merging tickets was to get one owner to work on similar (or
same) problems on one ticket instead of several, therefore, you merge
the tickets . before they get resolved. However, everyone does their
thing differently. I like the setup. That way it acts like a filter to
keep from merging tickets that are already resolved. you know, the cat
is already out of the bag, no sense closing it.
Kenn
From dunne at ntms1.accuweather.com Thu Jun 1 13:24:36 2006
From: dunne at ntms1.accuweather.com (Michael Dunne)
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 13:24:36 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] RT on Mac OS X Server 10.4
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
Howdy,
I managed to get it running on OS X4.6 client. Which modules are you having
difficulty with?
Mike
On 6/1/06 12:54 PM, "Jason Fouks" wrote:
> I am running 10.4.6 on a test box. I am trying to get the PERL
> modules built but it seems to fail every time which means I can't get
> the RT program running. Has anyone had success with getting the PERL
> modules built and have step by step directions as to how to get RT
> built on a brand new 10.4.6 OS X Server?
>
> Thanks much,
> Jason
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
>
>
> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>
>
> We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical:
> http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
>
From ocraig at stillsecure.com Thu Jun 1 13:33:18 2006
From: ocraig at stillsecure.com (Ole Craig)
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 11:33:18 -0600
Subject: [rt-users] 3.6.0rc3: giving groups modification rights on members
of other groups?
Message-ID: <1149183198.8518.85.camel@hex.latis.com>
Is it possible for a user-defined group to get the "AdminUser"
right but only for selected users? i.e. I've got a U-D group "support".
I'd like members of the Support group to be able to modify user
information for unprivileged users, but not for members of other
user-defined groups.
In the groups rights screen for the support group
(Configuration->Groups->Support) I've given the support group the
following rights on the Unprivileged group:
AdminGroup
AdminGroupMembership
ModifyOwnMembership
SeeGroup
...but support members are still unable to modify user information for
unpriv'd users. Am I missing something?
--
/Ole Craig
Security Engineer
303-381-3802 (main support hotline)
303-381-3824 (my direct line)
303-381-3801 (fax)
www.stillsecure.com
. . .
From jesse at bestpractical.com Thu Jun 1 13:43:12 2006
From: jesse at bestpractical.com (Jesse Vincent)
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 13:43:12 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] 3.6.0rc3: giving groups modification rights on members
of other groups?
In-Reply-To: <1149183198.8518.85.camel@hex.latis.com>
References: <1149183198.8518.85.camel@hex.latis.com>
Message-ID: <20060601174312.GK8022@bestpractical.com>
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 11:33:18AM -0600, Ole Craig wrote:
> Is it possible for a user-defined group to get the "AdminUser"
> right but only for selected users? i.e. I've got a U-D group "support".
> I'd like members of the Support group to be able to modify user
> information for unprivileged users, but not for members of other
> user-defined groups.
>
Sorry. That's not currently possible.
From KFCrocker at lbl.gov Thu Jun 1 13:51:50 2006
From: KFCrocker at lbl.gov (Kenneth Crocker)
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 10:51:50 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] 3.6.0rc3: giving groups modification rights on members
of other groups?
In-Reply-To: <20060601174312.GK8022@bestpractical.com>
References: <1149183198.8518.85.camel@hex.latis.com>
<20060601174312.GK8022@bestpractical.com>
Message-ID: <447F2936.9060506@lbl.gov>
Jesse Vincent wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 11:33:18AM -0600, Ole Craig wrote:
>
>> Is it possible for a user-defined group to get the "AdminUser"
>> right but only for selected users? i.e. I've got a U-D group "support".
>> I'd like members of the Support group to be able to modify user
>> information for unprivileged users, but not for members of other
>> user-defined groups.
>>
>>
>
> Sorry. That's not currently possible.
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
>
>
> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>
>
> We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical: http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
>
>
Ole,
Although we subscribe to the "group" method of assigning privileges
as opposed to the individual "users", for something like this, you might
just want to create a list of certain users and make them superusers and
they can do anything. Not consistent with our philosophy, but sometimes
you have to break a rule to get the job done, if the job is that important.
Kenn/LBNL
From ocraig at stillsecure.com Thu Jun 1 14:05:07 2006
From: ocraig at stillsecure.com (Ole Craig)
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 12:05:07 -0600
Subject: [rt-users] 3.6.0rc3: giving groups modification rights on
members of other groups?
In-Reply-To: <20060601174312.GK8022@bestpractical.com>
References: <1149183198.8518.85.camel@hex.latis.com>
<20060601174312.GK8022@bestpractical.com>
Message-ID: <1149185107.8518.101.camel@hex.latis.com>
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 13:43 -0400, Jesse Vincent wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 11:33:18AM -0600, Ole Craig wrote:
> > Is it possible for a user-defined group to get the "AdminUser"
> > right but only for selected users? i.e. I've got a U-D group "support".
> > I'd like members of the Support group to be able to modify user
> > information for unprivileged users, but not for members of other
> > user-defined groups.
> >
>
> Sorry. That's not currently possible.
Urk. That's... dismaying. Has anyone ever asked before? I
couldn't find anything in the archives, but it seems like an obvious
"want" feature to me, in that I'd like my support staff brethren to be
able to add notes about particular customers and update phone numbers
and such, but I don't want them to modify the user records for the
executive team (for instance.)
In re-reading my screed I realize that my logic was overly
fuzzified during verbalization: support staff should be able to modify
the user record of any member of a particular group (regardless of that
user's other group memberships) as long as the support group has been
given the appropriate rights for the target group.
Given the immediacy and brevity of Jesse's answer, I suspect
that's a distinction that fails to make a difference, but clearer logic
is always useful. Particularly since I may have to try and hack the
functionality in somehow, so I'm attempting to flesh out the equivalence
cases...
--
/Ole Craig
Security Engineer
303-381-3802 (main support hotline)
303-381-3824 (my direct line)
303-381-3801 (fax)
www.stillsecure.com
. . .
From jesse at bestpractical.com Thu Jun 1 15:42:25 2006
From: jesse at bestpractical.com (Jesse Vincent)
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 15:42:25 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] 3.6.0rc3: giving groups modification rights on members
of other groups?
In-Reply-To: <1149185107.8518.101.camel@hex.latis.com>
References: <1149183198.8518.85.camel@hex.latis.com>
<20060601174312.GK8022@bestpractical.com>
<1149185107.8518.101.camel@hex.latis.com>
Message-ID: <20060601194225.GN8022@bestpractical.com>
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 12:05:07PM -0600, Ole Craig wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 13:43 -0400, Jesse Vincent wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 11:33:18AM -0600, Ole Craig wrote:
> > > Is it possible for a user-defined group to get the "AdminUser"
> > > right but only for selected users? i.e. I've got a U-D group "support".
> > > I'd like members of the Support group to be able to modify user
> > > information for unprivileged users, but not for members of other
> > > user-defined groups.
> > >
> >
> > Sorry. That's not currently possible.
>
> Urk. That's... dismaying. Has anyone ever asked before? I
> couldn't find anything in the archives, but it seems like an obvious
> "want" feature to me, in that I'd like my support staff brethren to be
> able to add notes about particular customers and update phone numbers
> and such, but I don't want them to modify the user records for the
> executive team (for instance.)
You're welcome to have your money back ;) Seriously, though, it's a
feature that I'd find useful, but isn't something we've ever _needed_ in
house or at any customer site. If you hack it together in a way that
would be a sane RT core change, it's something I'd be happy to see in a
future release.
> In re-reading my screed I realize that my logic was overly
> fuzzified during verbalization: support staff should be able to modify
> the user record of any member of a particular group (regardless of that
> user's other group memberships) as long as the support group has been
> given the appropriate rights for the target group.
It was clear. More often, I see this requirement as "Customer service
should be able to modify user attributes for unprivileged users. Your
description is a reasonable generalization.
> Given the immediacy and brevity of Jesse's answer, I suspect
> that's a distinction that fails to make a difference, but clearer logic
> is always useful. Particularly since I may have to try and hack the
> functionality in somehow, so I'm attempting to flesh out the equivalence
> cases...
The brevity was actually likely due to the fact that I'm crunching on
way too many things but still want to be at least marginally useful to
the community. It seemed like I could give you a "nope, it's not there".
I didn't mean it to sound abrasive. Sorry if I did.
Best,
Jesse
> --
> /Ole Craig
> Security Engineer
>
> 303-381-3802 (main support hotline)
> 303-381-3824 (my direct line)
> 303-381-3801 (fax)
>
> www.stillsecure.com
> . . .
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
>
>
> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>
>
> We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical: http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
>
--
From tomw at bnl.gov Thu Jun 1 15:47:14 2006
From: tomw at bnl.gov (Tomasz Wlodek)
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 15:47:14 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [rt-users] How to add requestor name in Templates?
In-Reply-To:
References: <20060503174640.GA22009@qwestip.net>
Message-ID:
Hello everybody,
I would like to modify the Correspindence Template and Admin
Correspondence so that it contains some information about who the
requestor of the ticket was.
I have added the following line to template:
Original requestor address {$Ticket->RequestorAddresses}
And it shows now in text of e-mails the e-mail of ticket requestor.
Great.
But Now I would like to see requestors real name. How do I do this?
This must be a very simple, some line
Requestor name - {$Ticket->....}
where instead of ... I give the field name which corresponds to requestor
real name. What exactly is this field?
I can't find description in the book, nor on the wiki.
Tomasz Wlodek | tel 631-344-7448
Brookhaven Laboratory, Building 510M | fax 631-344-7616
Upton NY 11973-5000 |
From ocraig at stillsecure.com Thu Jun 1 15:57:37 2006
From: ocraig at stillsecure.com (Ole Craig)
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 13:57:37 -0600
Subject: [rt-users] 3.6.0rc3: giving groups modification rights on
members of other groups?
In-Reply-To: <20060601194225.GN8022@bestpractical.com>
References: <1149183198.8518.85.camel@hex.latis.com>
<20060601174312.GK8022@bestpractical.com>
<1149185107.8518.101.camel@hex.latis.com>
<20060601194225.GN8022@bestpractical.com>
Message-ID: <1149191857.8518.124.camel@hex.latis.com>
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 15:42 -0400, Jesse Vincent wrote:
>
> You're welcome to have your money back ;) Seriously, though, it's a
> feature that I'd find useful, but isn't something we've ever _needed_ in
> house or at any customer site. If you hack it together in a way that
> would be a sane RT core change, it's something I'd be happy to see in a
> future release.
I'll see what I can come up with. It'll be a good excuse to dust off my
Camel. :-)
[...]
> It was clear. More often, I see this requirement as "Customer service
> should be able to modify user attributes for unprivileged users. Your
> description is a reasonable generalization.
Yup, I was attempting to generalize into the existing ACL paradigm as
much as possible. (Plus we're probably going to have multiple levels of
users, and some levels should be able to modify others -- partners,
resellers, OEM... &etc.)
[...]
> The brevity was actually likely due to the fact that I'm crunching on
> way too many things but still want to be at least marginally useful to
> the community. It seemed like I could give you a "nope, it's not there".
> I didn't mean it to sound abrasive. Sorry if I did.
Not at all! I was just thinking that since you replied so quickly and
definitively (and without any of your usual hints to the effect of "but
if you wanted to do here's where to
look") ...it seemed unlikely that my restatement would provoke a
different response. No abrasion was inferred or suffered, and my
apologies for jogging your elbow mid-juggle. (Or mid-crunch.)
Thanks for a great toolkit,
Ole
--
/Ole Craig
Security Engineer
303-381-3802 (main support hotline)
303-381-3824 (my direct line)
303-381-3801 (fax)
www.stillsecure.com
. . .
From jauty at indiana.edu Thu Jun 1 16:03:26 2006
From: jauty at indiana.edu (Joe Auty)
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 16:03:26 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] CommandByMail RT Extension
Message-ID: <8872B31E-773B-483E-9339-7EA1F7144FA5@indiana.edu>
Hi,
I was working with Jesse Vincent on this, but decided to contact the
list with this question since not only might I find an answer here,
but this answer might be useful to others too...
I'd like to use this extension as a means of parsing out custom field
information sent to the queue address by a script. Extension can be
downloaded here:
http://search.cpan.org/~jesse/RT-Extension-CommandByMail-0.02/lib/RT/
Extension/CommandByMail.pm
I'm trying to
1) verify I have installed this extension correctly, and
2) verify its intended usage
I've added the line:
@MailPlugins = qw(Auth::MailFrom Filter::TakeAction);
to my RT_SiteConfig.pm file, compiled and installed the extension
with no problem, applied the patch with no problems either, and
finally restarted Apache. RT came up fine, but according to the
System Configuration page neither your Extension nor Auth::MailFrom
was loaded... Should this page list CommandByMail, and if so, any
advice on how I can track down this problem?
I'm assuming that once the extension is loaded, I would simply have
to add a line like this somewhere in my message body for this to work?
> CF.{CUsername}: jauty
>
> hello
>
(in this example, this would set CustomField "Username" with the
value "jauty"?)
Is this the intended usage here?
-----------
Joe Auty
UITS Messaging
Indiana University
jauty at indiana.edu
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL:
From sturner at MIT.EDU Thu Jun 1 16:51:10 2006
From: sturner at MIT.EDU (Stephen Turner)
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 16:51:10 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] CommandByMail RT Extension
In-Reply-To: <8872B31E-773B-483E-9339-7EA1F7144FA5@indiana.edu>
References: <8872B31E-773B-483E-9339-7EA1F7144FA5@indiana.edu>
Message-ID: <6.2.3.4.2.20060601164757.034f9038@po14.mit.edu>
At Thursday 6/1/2006 04:03 PM, Joe Auty wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I was working with Jesse Vincent on this, but decided to contact the
>list with this question since not only might I find an answer here,
>but this answer might be useful to others too...
>
>I'd like to use this extension as a means of parsing out custom field
>information sent to the queue address by a script. Extension can be
>downloaded here:
>
>http://search.cpan.org/~jesse/RT-Extension-CommandByMail-0.02/lib/RT/
>Extension/CommandByMail.pm
In terms of functionality, how does this differ from Dirk Pape's
scrip/template extension for filling in CFs from email?
(http://wiki.bestpractical.com/index.cgi?Contributions ->
ScripActions -> ExtractCustomFieldValues).
Thanks,
Steve
From jesse at bestpractical.com Thu Jun 1 16:55:49 2006
From: jesse at bestpractical.com (Jesse Vincent)
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 16:55:49 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] CommandByMail RT Extension
In-Reply-To: <6.2.3.4.2.20060601164757.034f9038@po14.mit.edu>
References: <8872B31E-773B-483E-9339-7EA1F7144FA5@indiana.edu>
<6.2.3.4.2.20060601164757.034f9038@po14.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <20060601205549.GO8022@bestpractical.com>
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 04:51:10PM -0400, Stephen Turner wrote:
> At Thursday 6/1/2006 04:03 PM, Joe Auty wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I was working with Jesse Vincent on this, but decided to contact the
> >list with this question since not only might I find an answer here,
> >but this answer might be useful to others too...
> >
> >I'd like to use this extension as a means of parsing out custom field
> >information sent to the queue address by a script. Extension can be
> >downloaded here:
> >
> >http://search.cpan.org/~jesse/RT-Extension-CommandByMail-0.02/lib/RT/
> >Extension/CommandByMail.pm
>
> In terms of functionality, how does this differ from Dirk Pape's
> scrip/template extension for filling in CFs from email?
> (http://wiki.bestpractical.com/index.cgi?Contributions ->
> ScripActions -> ExtractCustomFieldValues).
>
That's a "pull these bits of data"
This is a full "Do stuff by mail" command mode.
RT-Extension-CommandByMail version 0.0.1
INSTALLATION
Read INSTALL file to get more info about installation.
COPYRIGHT AND LICENCE
Copyright (C) 2006, Best Practical Solutions LLC.
This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the same terms as Perl itself.
DESCRIPTION
This extension parse content of incoming messages for list commands.
Format of commands is:
Command: value
Command: value
...
You can find list of "COMMANDS commands below".
Some commands (like Status, Queue and other) can be used only once.
Commands that manage lists can be used multiple times, for example link,
custom fields and watchers commands. Also, the latter can be used with
"Add" and "Del" prefixes to add/delete values from the current list of
the ticket you reply to or comment on.
COMMANDS
Basic
Queue:
Set new queue for the ticket
Subject:
Set new subject to the given string
Status:
Set new status, one of new, open, stalled, resolved, rejected or
deleted
Owner:
Set new owner using the given username
Priority: <#>
Set new priority to the given value
FinalPriority: <#>
Set new final priority to the given value
Dates
Set new date/timestamp, or 0 to unset:
Due:
Starts:
Started:
Time
Set new times to the given value in minutes. Note that on
correspond/comment "TimeWorked" add time to the current value.
TimeWorked:
TimeEstimated:
TimeLeft:
Watchers
Manage watchers: requestors, ccs and admin ccs. This commands can be
used several times and/or with "Add" and "Del" prefixes, for example
"Requestor" comand set requestor(s) and the current requestors would be
deleted, but "AddRequestor" command adds to the current list.
Requestor: Set requestor(s) using the email address
AddRequestor: Add new requestor using the email address
DelRequestor: Remove email address as requestor
Cc: Set Cc watcher(s) using the email address
AddCc: Add new Cc watcher using the email address
DelCc: Remove email address as Cc watcher
AdminCc: Set AdminCc watcher(s) using the email address
AddAdminCc: Add new AdminCc watcher using the email address
DelAdminCc: Remove email address as AdminCc watcher
Links
Manage links. These commands are also could be used several times in one
message.
DependsOn:
DependedOnBy:
RefersTo:
ReferredToBy:
Members:
MemberOf:
Custom field values
Manage custom field values. Could be used multiple times.
CustomField.{C}:
AddCustomField.{C}:
DelCustomField.{C}:
Short forms:
CF.{C}:
AddCF.{C}:
DelCF.{C}:
From ruslan.zakirov at gmail.com Thu Jun 1 17:03:01 2006
From: ruslan.zakirov at gmail.com (Ruslan Zakirov)
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 01:03:01 +0400
Subject: [rt-users] CommandByMail RT Extension
In-Reply-To: <6.2.3.4.2.20060601164757.034f9038@po14.mit.edu>
References: <8872B31E-773B-483E-9339-7EA1F7144FA5@indiana.edu>
<6.2.3.4.2.20060601164757.034f9038@po14.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <589c94400606011403u7f633cf0saebab42b1e335394@mail.gmail.com>
Overview:
http://search.cpan.org/dist/RT-Extension-CommandByMail/lib/RT/Extension/CommandByMail.pm
Installation instructions:
http://search.cpan.org/dist/RT-Extension-CommandByMail/INSTALL
Supported commands:
http://search.cpan.org/dist/RT-Extension-CommandByMail/README
Sorry, I made an error in POD, custom field commands CF.{xxxx} without
C in curly brackets.
Also, note that 3.6 branch needs patching too as 3.4, I think patch
for 3.4.5 should work. Please, send me a note if you couldn't apply
patch to 3.6 I'll create new one.
On 6/2/06, Stephen Turner wrote:
> At Thursday 6/1/2006 04:03 PM, Joe Auty wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I was working with Jesse Vincent on this, but decided to contact the
> >list with this question since not only might I find an answer here,
> >but this answer might be useful to others too...
> >
> >I'd like to use this extension as a means of parsing out custom field
> >information sent to the queue address by a script. Extension can be
> >downloaded here:
> >
> >http://search.cpan.org/~jesse/RT-Extension-CommandByMail-0.02/lib/RT/
> >Extension/CommandByMail.pm
>
> In terms of functionality, how does this differ from Dirk Pape's
> scrip/template extension for filling in CFs from email?
> (http://wiki.bestpractical.com/index.cgi?Contributions ->
> ScripActions -> ExtractCustomFieldValues).
>
> Thanks,
> Steve
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
>
>
> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>
>
> We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical: http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
>
--
Best regards, Ruslan.
From jauty at indiana.edu Thu Jun 1 17:06:31 2006
From: jauty at indiana.edu (Joe Auty)
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 17:06:31 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] CommandByMail RT Extension
In-Reply-To: <589c94400606011403u7f633cf0saebab42b1e335394@mail.gmail.com>
References: <8872B31E-773B-483E-9339-7EA1F7144FA5@indiana.edu>
<6.2.3.4.2.20060601164757.034f9038@po14.mit.edu>
<589c94400606011403u7f633cf0saebab42b1e335394@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <83F129D4-B29C-42E5-BE4D-264FB46A71DC@indiana.edu>
Awesome! It's working...
The problem was the extra C in the curly bracket... I hope finding
this typo is useful to others too!
On Jun 1, 2006, at 5:03 PM, Ruslan Zakirov wrote:
> Overview:
> http://search.cpan.org/dist/RT-Extension-CommandByMail/lib/RT/
> Extension/CommandByMail.pm
> Installation instructions:
> http://search.cpan.org/dist/RT-Extension-CommandByMail/INSTALL
> Supported commands:
> http://search.cpan.org/dist/RT-Extension-CommandByMail/README
>
> Sorry, I made an error in POD, custom field commands CF.{xxxx} without
> C in curly brackets.
>
> Also, note that 3.6 branch needs patching too as 3.4, I think patch
> for 3.4.5 should work. Please, send me a note if you couldn't apply
> patch to 3.6 I'll create new one.
>
>
>
>
> On 6/2/06, Stephen Turner wrote:
>> At Thursday 6/1/2006 04:03 PM, Joe Auty wrote:
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >I was working with Jesse Vincent on this, but decided to contact the
>> >list with this question since not only might I find an answer here,
>> >but this answer might be useful to others too...
>> >
>> >I'd like to use this extension as a means of parsing out custom
>> field
>> >information sent to the queue address by a script. Extension can be
>> >downloaded here:
>> >
>> >http://search.cpan.org/~jesse/RT-Extension-CommandByMail-0.02/lib/
>> RT/
>> >Extension/CommandByMail.pm
>>
>> In terms of functionality, how does this differ from Dirk Pape's
>> scrip/template extension for filling in CFs from email?
>> (http://wiki.bestpractical.com/index.cgi?Contributions ->
>> ScripActions -> ExtractCustomFieldValues).
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Steve
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>>
>> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
>> Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
>>
>>
>> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
>> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>>
>>
>> We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical: http://
>> bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
>>
>
>
> --
> Best regards, Ruslan.
-----------
Joe Auty
UITS Messaging
Indiana University
jauty at indiana.edu
From rickr at rice.edu Thu Jun 1 16:55:42 2006
From: rickr at rice.edu (Rick Russell)
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 15:55:42 -0500
Subject: [rt-users] How to add requestor name in Templates?
In-Reply-To:
References: <20060503174640.GA22009@qwestip.net>
Message-ID: <447F544E.9060504@rice.edu>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Tomasz Wlodek wrote:
> But Now I would like to see requestors real name. How do I do this?
>
> This must be a very simple, some line
>
> Requestor name - {$Ticket->....}
Requestor name - {$Ticket->Requestors->UsersObj->First->RealName}
If there is more than one requestor, you'll need to write a routine to
go through them, probably using the $Ticket->Requestors->UsersObj->Next
method in a loop.
> I can't find description in the book, nor on the wiki.
It would be nice (HINT HINT) if RT Essentials included a reference list
of the common object methods, the objects to which they apply, and a
simple example of each one in use :-)
Sure, an exhaustive list would require a hundred pages, but you could
hit 90% of the objects and methods that somebody is likely to use in a
couple of dozen pages.
Rick R.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEf1ROXIxWysfLtmkRAlrMAJ4wZRpuknciGKRq1cMpYoL/FgNmDwCfUEQo
0GdCXSpb81Jzz5UmYh2Bulc=
=66k1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From KFCrocker at lbl.gov Thu Jun 1 19:17:07 2006
From: KFCrocker at lbl.gov (Kenneth Crocker)
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 16:17:07 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] How to add requestor name in Templates?
In-Reply-To: <447F544E.9060504@rice.edu>
References: <20060503174640.GA22009@qwestip.net>
<447F544E.9060504@rice.edu>
Message-ID: <447F7573.5000801@lbl.gov>
Rick Russell wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> Tomasz Wlodek wrote:
>
>
>> But Now I would like to see requestors real name. How do I do this?
>>
>> This must be a very simple, some line
>>
>> Requestor name - {$Ticket->....}
>>
>
> Requestor name - {$Ticket->Requestors->UsersObj->First->RealName}
>
> If there is more than one requestor, you'll need to write a routine to
> go through them, probably using the $Ticket->Requestors->UsersObj->Next
> method in a loop.
>
>
>> I can't find description in the book, nor on the wiki.
>>
>
> It would be nice (HINT HINT) if RT Essentials included a reference list
> of the common object methods, the objects to which they apply, and a
> simple example of each one in use :-)
>
> Sure, an exhaustive list would require a hundred pages, but you could
> hit 90% of the objects and methods that somebody is likely to use in a
> couple of dozen pages.
>
> Rick R.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFEf1ROXIxWysfLtmkRAlrMAJ4wZRpuknciGKRq1cMpYoL/FgNmDwCfUEQo
> 0GdCXSpb81Jzz5UmYh2Bulc=
> =66k1
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
>
>
> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>
>
> We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical: http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
>
>
HERE! HERE!
From admin at fouks.net Thu Jun 1 21:03:31 2006
From: admin at fouks.net (Jason Fouks)
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 20:03:31 -0500
Subject: [rt-users] RT on Mac OS X Server 10.4
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID: <42F92C58-C436-4F86-8CDF-0D9CC5111954@fouks.net>
When I installed 10.4.6 server along with Xcode 2.2 I tried using
CPAN to get the any of the perl modules working and none of the perl
modules seemed to go successfully. I was working with this article I
found on the internet and failed at it using these directions.
(https://portal.aero.und.edu/docs/general/rtosx)
Jason
On Jun 1, 2006, at 12:18 PM, Michael Dunne wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I managed to get it running on OS X4.6 client. Which modules are
> you having
> difficulty with?
>
> Mike
>
>
> On 6/1/06 12:54 PM, "Jason Fouks" wrote:
>
>> I am running 10.4.6 on a test box. I am trying to get the PERL
>> modules built but it seems to fail every time which means I can't get
>> the RT program running. Has anyone had success with getting the PERL
>> modules built and have step by step directions as to how to get RT
>> built on a brand new 10.4.6 OS X Server?
>>
>> Thanks much,
>> Jason
>> _______________________________________________
>> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>>
>> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
>> Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
>>
>>
>> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
>> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>>
>>
>> We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical:
>> http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
>>
>
>
>
From dyang at pactecsoft.com Fri Jun 2 03:18:00 2006
From: dyang at pactecsoft.com (david yang)
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 00:18:00 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] RT MAIL-GATEWAY
Message-ID:
Hi guys,
My rt version is 3.4.5, when I installed it, and want to mail through
rt-mail-gateway, but when I see the log (/var/log/maillog) ,It gives a
error messages, such as:
Jun 1 23:49:27 logstore postfix/local[28711]: 111A46E0050:
to=,
orig_to=, relay=local, delay=1233,
status=deferred (temporary failure. Command output: RT server error.
The RT server which handled your email did not behave as expected. It
said: Can't use an undefined value as an ARRAY reference at
/opt/rt3/lib/RT/EmailParser.pm line 624. Stack:
[/opt/rt3/lib/RT/EmailParser.pm:624]
[/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.5/Carp.pm:201] )
I don't know why, who can help me, thanks in advance!!
David Yang
From paul at boldra.com Fri Jun 2 05:10:44 2006
From: paul at boldra.com (Boldra)
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 11:10:44 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] user mailfilters with scrips?
Message-ID: <44800094.2090807@boldra.com>
Hello all
I'm looking at ways letting users set up their own mail filters for rt
to do very simple things like set the queue or the priority when a
string is matched, but I don't want to give users all the power of
scrips (or even all the power of regexes). Does anyone have any
suggestions for either A) limiting the power of scrips and what people
can do with them, or B) another way of allowing users to filter their
own mail?
Boldra
From andreas.sinn at cpb-software.ag Fri Jun 2 07:22:45 2006
From: andreas.sinn at cpb-software.ag (Andreas Sinn)
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 13:22:45 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] Autoreply Email
Message-ID: <07FD4DCB6B2E194495066CA0A5CF11770C646E@MXS1.cpbs.at>
Is it possible to send an autoreply email with subject like ticket name
and ticket number and not ticket number and ticket name?
Thanks
Andreas
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From brendanarnold at gmail.com Fri Jun 2 08:02:40 2006
From: brendanarnold at gmail.com (Brendan Arnold)
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 13:02:40 +0100
Subject: [rt-users] Lack of trailing slash causing porblems in IE
In-Reply-To: <5ed41c130606010841l1a106e01r3b20bff47e7ab08f@mail.gmail.com>
References:
<5ed41c130605220229v616dc65bu87e9b8a9c9592cfe@mail.gmail.com>
<5ed41c130606010841l1a106e01r3b20bff47e7ab08f@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5ed41c130606020502r17886dek5994d931e7bbdb5f@mail.gmail.com>
I inlcuded this Aoache directive to remove SSLv3 negotiations
SSLProtocol all -SSLv3
Since then I have not had any errors, although the porblem is
intermittent. If I have any trouble I will let the group know.
Brendan
On 6/1/06, Brendan Arnold wrote:
> I have tried changing the primary DNS hostname to that on our SSL
> certificate, however this has had no effect.
>
> I have just come across this article in the MS Knowledge base which
> may be of some help. I am going to try disabling SSL 3.0 connections
> as a result.
>
> http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=305217
>
> I will keep you posted as to progress.
>
> Brendan
>
From Eric.Dynowski at magnetar.com Fri Jun 2 08:20:18 2006
From: Eric.Dynowski at magnetar.com (Dynowski, Eric)
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 07:20:18 -0500
Subject: [rt-users] RT Hangs when clicking on the Tickets Link
Message-ID:
Everyone,
We hare having some problems moving RT from Windows to Linux. We are
currently running RT 3.0.12 on a windows machine and wish to move
everything to a Redhat AS4 Linux machine. To test the migration we are
using VMware. (I have also tried the same setup under Debian)
I have followed the install guide on the wiki and have RT working
without problems with a clean new empty database. I then dump the MySQL
database (using mysqldump) from the windows machine and reload it on the
Linux machine. I can login to RT and perform most functions. However
when I click the Tickets link on the upper left the session just hangs.
It appears that Apache gets stuck in some type of infinite loop and the
web server stops responding to all requests. There is an excerpt of the
apache error_log attached to this post. Those errors just keep on
logging over and over and over until I restart apache. I have tried
several different versions of RT with the same result. The output bellow
is from version 3.4.4 (I did run the schema, acl, etc DB upgrade
scripts). The same problem manifests itself on version 3.0.12 for Linux
too. Also note the messages logged to the RT debug log. Those appear
just after clicking the Tickets link so I assume they must be related.
One other interesting note: I had to rename almost all the tables after
reloading the database on Linux. The windows version of the database has
all the table names in lowercase. After loading the database on the
Linux server I did rename table commands to match the case of what the
Linux database table names.
Thanks
Eric.
[root at evvmware01 ~]# uname -a
Linux evvmware01.magnetar.com 2.6.9-5.EL #1 Wed Jan 5 19:22:18 EST 2005
i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
[root at evvmware01 ~]# cat /opt/rt3/lib/RT.pm|grep VERSION
use vars qw($VERSION $System $SystemUser $Nobody $Handle $Logger
$VERSION = '3.4.4';
[root at evvmware01 ~]# perl -v
This is perl, v5.8.5 built for i386-linux-thread-multi
[root at evvmware01 ~]# perl -MDBIx::SearchBuilder -e 'print
$DBIx::SearchBuilder::VERSION;'
1.43
[root at evvmware01 ~]# httpd -v
Server version: Apache/2.0.52
Server built: Nov 30 2004 11:22:20
[root at evvmware01 ~]# mysql -V
mysql Ver 14.7 Distrib 4.1.12, for redhat-linux-gnu (i386) using
readline 4.3
[root at evvmware01 log]# tail -f /opt/rt3/var/log/rt.log
[Thu May 25 04:35:48 2006] [debug]: RT::CustomField -> QueueObj
deprecated (/opt/rt3/lib/RT/CustomField_Overlay.pm:753)
[Thu May 25 04:35:48 2006] [debug]: RT::CustomField -> QueueObj
deprecated (/opt/rt3/lib/RT/CustomField_Overlay.pm:753)
tail -500 /var/log/httpd/error_log
[Wed May 24 23:36:01 2006] [error] [client 10.1.24.141] FastCGI: server
"/opt/rt3/bin/mason_handler.fcgi" stderr: \tDBIx::SearchBuilder::Next
('RT::Attributes=HASH(0xb22b5e8)') call ed
at /opt/rt3/lib/RT/Attributes_Overlay.pm line 80, referer:
http://testrt.magnetar.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1294
[Wed May 24 23:36:01 2006] [error] [client 10.1.24.141] FastCGI: server
"/opt/rt3/bin/mason_handler.fcgi" stderr:
\tRT::Attributes::_BuildAccessTable('RT::Attributes=HASH(0xb22b5e8 )')
called at /opt/rt3/lib/RT/Attributes_Overlay.pm line 73, referer:
http://testrt.magnetar.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1294
[Wed May 24 23:36:01 2006] [error] [client 10.1.24.141] FastCGI: server
"/opt/rt3/bin/mason_handler.fcgi" stderr: \tRT::Attributes::_DoSearch
('RT::Attributes=HASH(0xb22b5e8)') call ed
at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/DBIx/SearchBuilder.pm line 491,
referer: http://testrt.magnetar.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1294
[Wed May 24 23:36:01 2006] [error] [client 10.1.24.141] FastCGI: server
"/opt/rt3/bin/mason_handler.fcgi" stderr: \tDBIx::SearchBuilder::Next
('RT::Attributes=HASH(0xb22b5e8)') call ed
at /opt/rt3/lib/RT/Attributes_Overlay.pm line 80, referer:
http://testrt.magnetar.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1294
[Wed May 24 23:36:01 2006] [error] [client 10.1.24.141] FastCGI: server
"/opt/rt3/bin/mason_handler.fcgi" stderr:
\tRT::Attributes::_BuildAccessTable('RT::Attributes=HASH(0xb22b5e8 )')
called at /opt/rt3/lib/RT/Attributes_Overlay.pm line 73, referer:
http://testrt.magnetar.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1294
[Wed May 24 23:36:01 2006] [error] [client 10.1.24.141] FastCGI: server
"/opt/rt3/bin/mason_handler.fcgi" stderr: \tRT::Attributes::_DoSearch
('RT::Attributes=HASH(0xb22b5e8)') call ed
at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/DBIx/SearchBuilder.pm line 491,
referer: http://testrt.magnetar.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1294
[Wed May 24 23:36:01 2006] [error] [client 10.1.24.141] FastCGI: server
"/opt/rt3/bin/mason_handler.fcgi" stderr: \tDBIx::SearchBuilder::Next
('RT::Attributes=HASH(0xb22b5e8)') call ed
at /opt/rt3/lib/RT/Attributes_Overlay.pm line 80, referer:
http://testrt.magnetar.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1294
[Wed May 24 23:36:01 2006] [error] [client 10.1.24.141] FastCGI: server
"/opt/rt3/bin/mason_handler.fcgi" stderr:
\tRT::Attributes::_BuildAccessTable('RT::Attributes=HASH(0xb22b5e8 )')
called at /opt/rt3/lib/RT/Attributes_Overlay.pm line 73, referer:
http://testrt.magnetar.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1294
[Wed May 24 23:36:01 2006] [error] [client 10.1.24.141] FastCGI: server
"/opt/rt3/bin/mason_handler.fcgi" stderr: \tRT::Attributes::_DoSearch
('RT::Attributes=HASH(0xb22b5e8)') call ed
at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/DBIx/SearchBuilder.pm line 491,
referer: http://testrt.magnetar.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1294
[Wed May 24 23:36:01 2006] [error] [client 10.1.24.141] FastCGI: server
"/opt/rt3/bin/mason_handler.fcgi" stderr: \tDBIx::SearchBuilder::Next
('RT::Attributes=HASH(0xb22b5e8)') call ed
at /opt/rt3/lib/RT/Attributes_Overlay.pm line 80, referer:
http://testrt.magnetar.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1294
[Wed May 24 23:36:01 2006] [error] [client 10.1.24.141] FastCGI: server
"/opt/rt3/bin/mason_handler.fcgi" stderr:
\tRT::Attributes::_BuildAccessTable('RT::Attributes=HASH(0xb22b5e8 )')
called at /opt/rt3/lib/RT/Attributes_Overlay.pm line 73, referer:
http://testrt.magnetar.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1294
[Wed May 24 23:36:01 2006] [error] [client 10.1.24.141] FastCGI: server
"/opt/rt3/bin/mason_handler.fcgi" stderr: \tRT::Attributes::_DoSearch
('RT::Attributes=HASH(0xb22b5e8)') call ed
at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/DBIx/SearchBuilder.pm line 491,
referer: http://testrt.magnetar.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1294
[Wed May 24 23:36:01 2006] [error] [client 10.1.24.141] FastCGI: server
"/opt/rt3/bin/mason_handler.fcgi" stderr: \tDBIx::SearchBuilder::Next
('RT::Attributes=HASH(0xb22b5e8)') call ed
at /opt/rt3/lib/RT/Attributes_Overlay.pm line 80, referer:
http://testrt.magnetar.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1294
[Wed May 24 23:36:01 2006] [error] [client 10.1.24.141] FastCGI: server
"/opt/rt3/bin/mason_handler.fcgi" stderr:
\tRT::Attributes::_BuildAccessTable('RT::Attributes=HASH(0xb22b5e8 )')
called at /opt/rt3/lib/RT/Attributes_Overlay.pm line 73, referer:
http://testrt.magnetar.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1294
[Wed May 24 23:36:01 2006] [error] [client 10.1.24.141] FastCGI: server
"/opt/rt3/bin/mason_handler.fcgi" stderr: \tRT::Attributes::_DoSearch
('RT::Attributes=HASH(0xb22b5e8)') call ed
at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/DBIx/SearchBuilder.pm line 491,
referer: http://testrt.magnetar.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1294
[Wed May 24 23:36:01 2006] [error] [client 10.1.24.141] FastCGI: server
"/opt/rt3/bin/mason_handler.fcgi" stderr: \tDBIx::SearchBuilder::Next
('RT::Attributes=HASH(0xb22b5e8)') call ed
at /opt/rt3/lib/RT/Attributes_Overlay.pm line 80, referer:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From bradp at newmediagateway.com Fri Jun 2 09:55:53 2006
From: bradp at newmediagateway.com (Brad Pinkston)
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 08:55:53 -0500
Subject: [rt-users] Close Tabs on Display
Message-ID:
What is the best way to specify which tabs open by default on the
"Display" of a ticket? I would like to minimize all sections besides
"History" by default.
Brad Pinkston
Senior Systems Administrator
New Media Gateway
O: 214.206.3485
M: 469.682.6487
F: 303.496.2712
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1711 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL:
From skirk at insomniacgames.com Fri Jun 2 13:02:22 2006
From: skirk at insomniacgames.com (Steve Kirk)
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 10:02:22 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] Email Response "FROM" name
Message-ID: <514005087A4DA54CB81C428C81EAB93D01E8F572@EXCHANGE.insomniacgames.com>
In the RT_Config.pm, you can set the global email adddress FROM
variable. The default is "%s via RT", so it would display as "Joe Smith
via RT."
Is there any way to set that at a queue level?
I ask because one of the queues I use is for the public, and we'd rather
have some level of anonimity when we reply to those tickets (it's for
fan email, and some fans get a little fanatical when they have a name to
latch onto).
However, we like the feature for our internal responses - In our old
helpdesk system, people alwasy complained because they never knew who
sent a response from the system if they failed to sign the email.
Thanks,
Steve
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From purp at acm.org Fri Jun 2 16:56:29 2006
From: purp at acm.org (Jim Meyer)
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 13:56:29 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] LDAP Overlay Update: Account Autocreation
Message-ID:
Hello!
With the most enormous thanks possible to RuslanZakirov who got me
thinking about it the right way, and also to DirkPape for his notes on
Callbacks on the CleanlyCustomizeRT page, there's now a callback
extension for the LDAP overlay which autocreates RT accounts at login
if the user passes authentication. This means anyone in LDAP can
immediately log into RT with no need to first create their RT account.
I've updated the LDAP wiki page:
http://wiki.bestpractical.com/?LDAP
You can find the callback and installation instructions here:
http://wiki.bestpractical.com/?LdapAutocreateAuthCallback
You should be able to add this, restart your web server, and see the
results immediately.
I know a large number of you asked for this; I'm sorry it took so long
to get it right. It's right, now. =]
Cheers!
--j
--
Jim Meyer, Geek at Large purp at acm.org
From ocraig at stillsecure.com Fri Jun 2 17:12:12 2006
From: ocraig at stillsecure.com (Ole Craig)
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 15:12:12 -0600
Subject: [rt-users] Email Response "FROM" name
In-Reply-To: <514005087A4DA54CB81C428C81EAB93D01E8F572@EXCHANGE.insomniacgames.com>
References: <514005087A4DA54CB81C428C81EAB93D01E8F572@EXCHANGE.insomniacgames.com>
Message-ID: <1149282732.8518.248.camel@hex.latis.com>
On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 10:02 -0700, Steve Kirk wrote:
> In the RT_Config.pm, you can set the global email adddress FROM
> variable. The default is "%s via RT", so it would display as "Joe
> Smith via RT."
>
> Is there any way to set that at a queue level?
>
> I ask because one of the queues I use is for the public, and we'd
> rather have some level of anonimity when we reply to those tickets
> (it's for fan email, and some fans get a little fanatical when they
> have a name to latch onto).
>
> However, we like the feature for our internal responses - In our old
> helpdesk system, people alwasy complained because they never knew who
> sent a response from the system if they failed to sign the email.
I'm considering doing something similar. In my case, I like the
"friendly-from" for emails going out to external requestors -- because
it helps to keep customers from trying to correspond directly with an
engineer rather than going through RT -- but for emails coming through
RT to internal staff, I'd like to see the origin email address. In part
this is purely cosmetic; most peoples' email clients put that string
into the reply-string in the email (e.g. see the top of this email,
where it says "[...] Steve Kirk wrote:") and it looks weird when people
forget to edit the reply string and it goes out with "on this date at
this time 'Via RT' wrote:"
I've not had time to look at it yet (that's what weekends are for,
right? :-) but I suspect the way I'll end up going is to define a
template that rewrites the "From" header with suitable values obtained
from the ticket object, and then override the default scrip for "on
Correspond Notify AdminCcs" to use that template rather than the global
Admin Correspondence or Correspondence templates.
--
/Ole Craig
Security Engineer
303-381-3802 (main support hotline)
303-381-3824 (my direct line)
303-381-3801 (fax)
www.stillsecure.com
. . .
From bruno at marmier.net Fri Jun 2 22:18:52 2006
From: bruno at marmier.net (bruno at marmier.net)
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2006 04:18:52 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [rt-users] Timezone issue: configuration in RT_SiteConfig has no
effect
Message-ID: <39374.200.82.220.63.1149301132.squirrel@mail.lautre.net>
Hi everyone,
I am using RT release 3.4.4 on a Linux Debian Sarge server, with Apache
1.3, Mysql 4.0.24 and FastCGI.
The computer timezone is Europe/Paris, as the machine is in France
I am using RT in Venezuela, so my configuration file has the timezone
variable set to America/Caracas, but the system doesn't use it.
I have checked in the database: MySQL saves the time in GMT, so the system
works fine for the input.
But on my screen, the ticket are always dislayed with the Europe/Paris time.
I have tried to put every timezone posible in my RT_SiteConfig, and then
restarded Apache, but I have never been able to get other time displayed,
only the Europe/Paris time.
If someone has a solution, I would apreciate.
Best regards
Bruno
From pkime at Shopzilla.com Sat Jun 3 23:09:56 2006
From: pkime at Shopzilla.com (Philip Kime)
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2006 20:09:56 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] Known bug in RT 3.4.5 with disabled Group display?
Message-ID: <58B1112F0EEB7349AE14A0AA46F9CEC00137ABC2@szexchange.Shopzilla.inc>
Is it a known bug in 3.4.5 that the "Include disabled groups in listing"
box on the Groups display page does nothing? I added this to the INIT
sectionof /Admin/Groups/index.html and now it seems to work ...
if ($FindDisabledGroups) {
$Groups->{'find_disabled_rows'} = 1;
}
I found this out the hard way as I thought I'd disabled a group (I had)
went to display it to re-enable it, couldn't, recreated the group with
the same name (RT let me do this) and I ended up with two groups with
the same name. Some code I was using to set Group rights then kept
setting the rights on the invisible, disabled one and confused the hell
out of me ...
$Group->LoadUserDefinedGroup
found the disabled group first when loading the group by name ...
PK
--
Philip Kime
NOPS Systems Architect
310 401 0407
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From jesse at bestpractical.com Sat Jun 3 23:39:37 2006
From: jesse at bestpractical.com (Jesse Vincent)
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2006 23:39:37 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Known bug in RT 3.4.5 with disabled Group display?
In-Reply-To: <58B1112F0EEB7349AE14A0AA46F9CEC00137ABC2@szexchange.Shopzilla.inc>
References: <58B1112F0EEB7349AE14A0AA46F9CEC00137ABC2@szexchange.Shopzilla.inc>
Message-ID: <20060604033936.GO8022@bestpractical.com>
I believe we've already fixed this for 3.4.6, but checking that would be
appreciated?
On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 08:09:56PM -0700, Philip Kime wrote:
> Is it a known bug in 3.4.5 that the "Include disabled groups in listing"
> box on the Groups display page does nothing? I added this to the INIT
> sectionof /Admin/Groups/index.html and now it seems to work ...
>
> if ($FindDisabledGroups) {
> $Groups->{'find_disabled_rows'} = 1;
> }
>
> I found this out the hard way as I thought I'd disabled a group (I had)
> went to display it to re-enable it, couldn't, recreated the group with
> the same name (RT let me do this) and I ended up with two groups with
> the same name. Some code I was using to set Group rights then kept
> setting the rights on the invisible, disabled one and confused the hell
> out of me ...
>
> $Group->LoadUserDefinedGroup
>
> found the disabled group first when loading the group by name ...
>
> PK
>
> --
> Philip Kime
> NOPS Systems Architect
> 310 401 0407
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
>
>
> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>
>
> We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical: http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
--
From tomw at bnl.gov Sun Jun 4 12:07:39 2006
From: tomw at bnl.gov (Tomasz Wlodek)
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2006 12:07:39 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [rt-users] Known bug in RT 3.4.5 with disabled Group display?
In-Reply-To: <58B1112F0EEB7349AE14A0AA46F9CEC00137ABC2@szexchange.Shopzilla.inc>
References: <58B1112F0EEB7349AE14A0AA46F9CEC00137ABC2@szexchange.Shopzilla.inc>
Message-ID:
I can confirm that the same thing happened to me when I disabled a group.
Wne I tried to re-enable it the group was gone. I can still find
individual tickets from this group though.
Tomasz Wlodek | tel 631-344-7448
Brookhaven Laboratory, Building 510M | fax 631-344-7616
Upton NY 11973-5000 |
On Sat, 3 Jun 2006, Philip Kime wrote:
> Is it a known bug in 3.4.5 that the "Include disabled groups in listing"
> box on the Groups display page does nothing? I added this to the INIT
> sectionof /Admin/Groups/index.html and now it seems to work ...
>
> if ($FindDisabledGroups) {
> $Groups->{'find_disabled_rows'} = 1;
> }
>
> I found this out the hard way as I thought I'd disabled a group (I had)
> went to display it to re-enable it, couldn't, recreated the group with
> the same name (RT let me do this) and I ended up with two groups with
> the same name. Some code I was using to set Group rights then kept
> setting the rights on the invisible, disabled one and confused the hell
> out of me ...
>
> $Group->LoadUserDefinedGroup
>
> found the disabled group first when loading the group by name ...
>
> PK
>
> --
> Philip Kime
> NOPS Systems Architect
> 310 401 0407
>
>
From pkime at Shopzilla.com Sun Jun 4 17:36:56 2006
From: pkime at Shopzilla.com (Philip Kime)
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2006 14:36:56 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] Strange message when changing "Select One Value" CFs in
RT 3.4.5
Message-ID: <58B1112F0EEB7349AE14A0AA46F9CEC00137ABC4@szexchange.Shopzilla.inc>
If I change a "Select one value" CF in RT 3.4.5, I get two messages, for
example:
* ClusterCountryCode FR changed to US
* Custom field value FR could not be found for custom field
ClusterCountryCode
The change is fine and works but the second message is odd (it comes
from CustomField_Overlay.pm) - it looks like it tries to change it twice
and fails the second time because the value is already changed? Any
comments? Is this a bug?
PK
--
Philip Kime
NOPS Systems Architect
310 401 0407
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From rt-users-list at derman.com Mon Jun 5 00:42:03 2006
From: rt-users-list at derman.com (rt-users-list at derman.com)
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2006 21:42:03 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] RT On Intel Mac? - Answer
Message-ID:
A while ago I posted the query:
=====
Is there a secret to being able to get all the required perl modules to
compile/install on an Intel Mac?
Attempting:
install Bundle::CPAN
...yields many instances of:
-----
*** No rule to make target
`/System/Library/Perl/5.8.6/darwin-thread-multi-2level/CORE/config.h',
needed by `Makefile'. Stop.
-----
Anyone know whether there's a solution for this problem (and what it is)?
=====
Although I didn't get an answer, I did get a question that sparked an
investigation that led me to discover what I'd done ... or not done, in
this case.
The Perl config.h file (and many other headers) are installed via the
Xcode install (available for free via http://developer.apple.com/, signup
required). 'Though I had installed most of the developer stuff, I had
omitted installing the BSD SDK support ... which (Murphy's Law says) is
where the Perl development headers are contained.
Hope this helps someone else.
From onkars at wolfram.com Mon Jun 5 01:41:13 2006
From: onkars at wolfram.com (Onkar Singh)
Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2006 23:41:13 -0600
Subject: [rt-users] Customizing the RT log-in page
Message-ID: <4483C3F9.4020607@wolfram.com>
Hello everyone,
I want to customize the front page which one gets as soon as I log-in
into RT.
Our company has a number of queues, and the front page contains a lot of
information that is useless to our group members.
What I want is that when I log in, RT should contain a list of my open
tickets sorted in order of date, and nothing else.
Is it possible to do this?
Thanks,
- Onkar
From romain.degez at smartjog.com Mon Jun 5 07:51:35 2006
From: romain.degez at smartjog.com (Romain DEGEZ)
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 13:51:35 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] Accessing attachements from scrips
In-Reply-To: <4483C3F9.4020607@wolfram.com>
References: <4483C3F9.4020607@wolfram.com>
Message-ID: <44841AC7.3000701@smartjog.com>
Hello everyone,
I'm trying to access "Attachments" attached to a ticket from a scrip and I
can't figure out how to do this...
Can someone give me some pointers or sample code to do this ?
Thank you!
--
Romain DEGEZ, IT Manager
Smartjog S.A. - http://www.smartjog.com
16 Place de la R?publique, 75010 Paris, FRANCE
Phone : +33.1.49.96.63.19
Fax : +33.1.49.96.64.05
Cell : +33.6.84.24.65.21
From jparsons-lists at saffron.net Mon Jun 5 16:03:14 2006
From: jparsons-lists at saffron.net (Jason Parsons)
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 16:03:14 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] dbd::mysql:st execute failed
Message-ID: <20060605200313.GG3047@saffron.net>
Folks:
I have a new RT installation that has been causing me nightmares. When I
mail the system, it replies with a ticket number, but then fails to
actually create the ticket. The error given is:
[Mon Jun 5 19:55:57 2006] [warning]: DBD::mysql::st execute failed: MySQL
server has gone away at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/DBIx/SearchBuilder/Handle.pm line 492.
(/opt/rt3/lib/RT.pm:287)
Note that it got a ticket number and read some scrips before throwing this
error, so mysql is "clearly" available. I have tried reinstalling
dbd::mysql, and even tried reinstalling all of mod_perl2.
'make testdeps' does succeed properly, and I've noted no other problems
with mysql. I've tried dropping and rebuilding the mysql database, and
the same problem recurs (make dropdb; make initialize-database).
I'm running rt 3.4.5 on RHEL ES 4.
Any ideas?
Thank you.
- Jason Parsons
[Mon Jun 5 19:55:54 2006] [debug]: Found 3 scrips
(/opt/rt3/lib/RT/Scrips_Overlay.pm:356)
[Mon Jun 5 19:55:55 2006] [debug]: About to commit scrips for transaction
#75 (/opt/rt3/lib/RT/Transaction_Overlay.pm:169)
[Mon Jun 5 19:55:55 2006] [info]:
#110004/75 - Scrip 3
(/opt/rt3/lib/RT/Action/SendEmail.pm:237)
[Mon Jun 5 19:55:56 2006] [debug]: About to think about scrips for
transaction #76 (/opt/rt3/lib/RT/Transaction_Overlay.pm:156)
[Mon Jun 5 19:55:56 2006] [info]:
sent To:
devnull at saffron.net Cc: Bcc: (/opt/rt3/lib/RT/Action/SendEmail.pm:297)
[Mon Jun 5 19:55:56 2006] [info]:
#110004/75 - Scrip 4
(/opt/rt3/lib/RT/Action/SendEmail.pm:237)
[Mon Jun 5 19:55:57 2006] [warning]: DBD::mysql::st execute failed: MySQL
server has gone away at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/DBIx/SearchBuilder/Handle.pm line 492.
(/opt/rt3/lib/RT.pm:287)
From lists at akphs.com Mon Jun 5 16:27:07 2006
From: lists at akphs.com (Phil Smith III)
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 16:27:07 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Adding queue requires restart of Apache?
Message-ID: <002201c688de$6ae57e20$6601090a@Basement2>
I've found in the last few days that if I add a new queue to RT, it doesn't show up until I restart httpd. Is that expected?
This is 3.6.0pre1 -- admittedly not state-of-the-art (I've been dithering, waiting for 3.6.0).
...phsiii
From todd at chaka.net Mon Jun 5 16:34:33 2006
From: todd at chaka.net (Todd Chapman)
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 16:34:33 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Adding queue requires restart of Apache?
In-Reply-To: <002201c688de$6ae57e20$6601090a@Basement2>
References: <002201c688de$6ae57e20$6601090a@Basement2>
Message-ID: <20060605203433.GA26200@chaka.net>
Did you try just logging out and back in?
-Todd
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 04:27:07PM -0400, Phil Smith III wrote:
> I've found in the last few days that if I add a new queue to RT, it doesn't show up until I restart httpd. Is that expected?
>
> This is 3.6.0pre1 -- admittedly not state-of-the-art (I've been dithering, waiting for 3.6.0).
>
> ...phsiii
>
From jesse at bestpractical.com Mon Jun 5 17:55:49 2006
From: jesse at bestpractical.com (Jesse Vincent)
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 17:55:49 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] [Rt-announce] Best Practical Solutions Announces SVK
Acquisition - Total World Domination Plan Proceeding Apace
Message-ID: <20060605215549.GI8022@bestpractical.com>
Best Practical Solutions Announces SVK Acquisition - Total World Domination Plan Proceeding Apace
Every ticketing system sucks. Here at Best Practical, we're really proud
of the fact that RT sucks less than everything else out there and helps
many thousands of organizations around the world get their work done
with less pain and suffering.
We're a small software development shop. Between the publicly available
versions of RT available and our customer projects, we maintain
at least half a dozen active lines of development at any one time.
When we first started to do this sort of thing, each merge took about
six hours to integrate. That was ok when we were merging two branches
once a month....and totally failed when we were trying to merge changes
across six branches.
In 2003, Chia-liang Kao (clkao) took a year off work to create a version
control system that would let him hike and explore hot springs in Taiwan's
mountains and still be able to be a productive software developer. He
ended up creating SVK, an advanced distributed version control system
which runs atop Subversion, the industry standard enterprise version
control system. SVK let clkao mirror remote Subversion repositories,
create local branches, hack while offline and later resynchronize his
changes with the upstream Subversion servers. SVK is the best version
control system for getting your work done while you're hiking in the
mountains. It just so happens that what makes SVK wonderful when you're
soaking in the hot springs makes it an excellent platform for getting
your work done halfway around the world, on an airplane, in a cafe or
in your office.
SVK's advanced branching and merging revolutionized our development
process here at Best Practical. What used to take us days now takes
minutes. We can get more work done faster than ever before. We've been
rabid supporters of SVK since its birth. When clkao and I started talking
about how I bootstrapped RT into a business and how Best Practical
might be able to do something similar for SVK, I literally jumped at
the opportunity to help. (And by that, I mean that I jumped on a plane
to London on a day's notice to talk face to face about SVK's future.)
I'm pleased to announce that as of today, Chia-liang Kao has joined me
as a partner at Best Practical Solutions and we're pleased to announce
that SVK is now a Best Practical product. We remain 100% committed to
keeping both RT and SVK open source and are excited about about all the
cool new functionality we'll be able to offer users of both products.
Over the next couple months, we'll be announcing new support, consulting
and custom development services related to SVK and software revision
control. You'll also see SVK's website, mailing list and repository
move to Best Practical, where we can offer a higher level of service
for all users.
You can find out more about SVK at http://svk.elixus.org.
Best,
Jesse
--
_______________________________________________
RT-Announce mailing list
RT-Announce at lists.bestpractical.com
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-announce
From lists at akphs.com Mon Jun 5 18:09:40 2006
From: lists at akphs.com (Phil Smith III)
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 18:09:40 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Adding queue requires restart of Apache?
In-Reply-To: <20060605203433.GA26200@chaka.net>
Message-ID: <004b01c688ec$be33e810$6601090a@Basement2>
Yes...no change.
-----Original Message-----
From: Todd Chapman [mailto:todd at chaka.net]
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 4:35 PM
To: Phil Smith III
Cc: rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: Re: [rt-users] Adding queue requires restart of Apache?
Did you try just logging out and back in?
-Todd
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 04:27:07PM -0400, Phil Smith III wrote:
> I've found in the last few days that if I add a new queue to RT, it doesn't show up until I restart httpd. Is that expected?
>
> This is 3.6.0pre1 -- admittedly not state-of-the-art (I've been dithering, waiting for 3.6.0).
>
> ...phsiii
>
From Hossein.Rafighi at triumf.ca Mon Jun 5 18:00:38 2006
From: Hossein.Rafighi at triumf.ca (Hossein Rafighi)
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 15:00:38 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] Users interface in RT 3.4.5
In-Reply-To: <58B1112F0EEB7349AE14A0AA46F9CEC00137ABC4@szexchange.Shopzilla.inc>
References: <58B1112F0EEB7349AE14A0AA46F9CEC00137ABC4@szexchange.Shopzilla.inc>
Message-ID: <4484A986.9080301@triumf.ca>
Hi All,
I am trying to change the: "Requestors" to read: "Requestors Email". A
simple change you may think?!
I have done it in both share/html/SelfService/Create.html and
var/mason_data/obj/3544762124/standard/SelfService/Create.html.obj where
I could see a related reference to this field. I have also given any and
all possible rights to privileged (Let this user be granted right), and
non-privileged users (users with NO "Let this user be granted right").
Privileged users see "Requestors Email", but non-privileged users only
see the default "Requestors".
Any ideas how to make everyone to see the change I made?
Many thanks,
--
_____ _____ _____ _ _ _ _ ____ Hossein Rafighi
|_ _|| _ \ |_ _|| | | || \_/ || __|TRIUMF, 4004 Wesbrook Mall
| | | |_| ) | | | | | || || |__ Vancouver BC, Canada, V6T 2A3
| | | _ / | | | \_/ || \_/ || __|Voice: (604) 222-1047
| | | | \ \ _| |_ | || | | || | Fax: (604) 222-1074
|_| |_| \_\|_____| \___/ |_| |_||_| Website: http://www.triumf.ca
From todd at chaka.net Mon Jun 5 21:30:25 2006
From: todd at chaka.net (Todd Chapman)
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 21:30:25 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Adding queue requires restart of Apache?
In-Reply-To: <004b01c688ec$be33e810$6601090a@Basement2>
References: <20060605203433.GA26200@chaka.net>
<004b01c688ec$be33e810$6601090a@Basement2>
Message-ID: <20060606013025.GB26200@chaka.net>
What queues you can see is checked once and then stored in your
session, so maybe there is something wrong with you session
handling.
Try this:
1. Create new queue
2. Log out
3. Clear all your browser cookies (or just the RT one)
4. Log back in.
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 06:09:40PM -0400, Phil Smith III wrote:
> Yes...no change.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Todd Chapman [mailto:todd at chaka.net]
> Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 4:35 PM
> To: Phil Smith III
> Cc: rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
> Subject: Re: [rt-users] Adding queue requires restart of Apache?
>
> Did you try just logging out and back in?
>
> -Todd
>
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 04:27:07PM -0400, Phil Smith III wrote:
> > I've found in the last few days that if I add a new queue to RT, it doesn't show up until I restart httpd. Is that expected?
> >
> > This is 3.6.0pre1 -- admittedly not state-of-the-art (I've been dithering, waiting for 3.6.0).
> >
> > ...phsiii
> >
>
From todd at chaka.net Mon Jun 5 21:32:59 2006
From: todd at chaka.net (Todd Chapman)
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 21:32:59 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Users interface in RT 3.4.5
In-Reply-To: <4484A986.9080301@triumf.ca>
References: <58B1112F0EEB7349AE14A0AA46F9CEC00137ABC4@szexchange.Shopzilla.inc>
<4484A986.9080301@triumf.ca>
Message-ID: <20060606013259.GC26200@chaka.net>
Remove the var/mason_data/obj directory and restart RT.
Also see: http://wiki.bestpractical.com/index.cgi?CleanlyCustomizeRT
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 03:00:38PM -0700, Hossein Rafighi wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am trying to change the: "Requestors" to read: "Requestors Email". A
> simple change you may think?!
> I have done it in both share/html/SelfService/Create.html and
> var/mason_data/obj/3544762124/standard/SelfService/Create.html.obj where
> I could see a related reference to this field. I have also given any and
> all possible rights to privileged (Let this user be granted right), and
> non-privileged users (users with NO "Let this user be granted right").
> Privileged users see "Requestors Email", but non-privileged users only
> see the default "Requestors".
>
> Any ideas how to make everyone to see the change I made?
>
> Many thanks,
>
> --
> _____ _____ _____ _ _ _ _ ____ Hossein Rafighi
> |_ _|| _ \ |_ _|| | | || \_/ || __|TRIUMF, 4004 Wesbrook Mall
> | | | |_| ) | | | | | || || |__ Vancouver BC, Canada, V6T 2A3
> | | | _ / | | | \_/ || \_/ || __|Voice: (604) 222-1047
> | | | | \ \ _| |_ | || | | || | Fax: (604) 222-1074
> |_| |_| \_\|_____| \___/ |_| |_||_| Website: http://www.triumf.ca
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
>
>
> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>
>
> We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical:
> http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
From wade at naveja.net Mon Jun 5 22:17:55 2006
From: wade at naveja.net (Wade Naveja)
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 19:17:55 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [rt-users] Can't bind: LDAP_INVALID_CREDENTIALS 49
Message-ID:
I'm running Request Tracker 3.4.5 on a FreeBSD 5.4 server with Apache
1.3.34 and MySQL 4.1.13. The installation went smooth, and my team is
very happy with RT over our current home brew ticketing application.
I'm running into trouble with LDAP authentication against a Windows 2003
domain controller. I've followed the
instructions found at:
http://wiki.bestpractical.com/?LDAP
http://wiki.bestpractical.com/index.cgi?LdapUserLocalOverlay
http://wiki.bestpractical.com/index.cgi?LdapSiteConfigSettings
I've got loggin cranked up, and I'm seeing the following:
[Tue Jun 6 01:51:01 2006] [critical]: RT::User::LookupExternalUserInfo
Can't bind: LDAP_INVALID_CREDENTIALS 49
(/usr/local/rt3/lib/RT/User_Local.pm:475)
Any suggestions on what might be causing this, and how to resolve?
Regards,
Wade Naveja
From ocraig at stillsecure.com Mon Jun 5 23:55:10 2006
From: ocraig at stillsecure.com (Ole Craig)
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 21:55:10 -0600
Subject: [rt-users] Can't bind: LDAP_INVALID_CREDENTIALS 49
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID: <1149563267.25839.67.camel@hex.latis.com>
On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 19:17 -0700, Wade Naveja wrote:
> I've got loggin cranked up, and I'm seeing the following:
>
> [Tue Jun 6 01:51:01 2006] [critical]: RT::User::LookupExternalUserInfo
> Can't bind: LDAP_INVALID_CREDENTIALS 49
> (/usr/local/rt3/lib/RT/User_Local.pm:475)
>
Error 49 is the generic LDAP error returned when the account you're
using to bind (NOT the account you're trying to authenticate) has
invalid credentials, usually a bad or expired password but not always.
Active Directory returns a cryptic sub-error code:
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?forumID=51&threadID=658510
... excerpt:
The AD-specific error code is the one after "data" and before "vece" or
"v893" in the actual error string returned to the binding process (if
you can get a look at that message):
* 525 - user not found
* 52e - invalid credentials
* 530 - not permitted to logon at this time
* 532 - password expired
* 533 - account disabled
* 701 - account expired
* 773 - user must reset password
Hope that's useful,
Ole
--
/Ole Craig
Security Engineer
303-381-3802 (main support hotline)
303-381-3824 (my direct line)
303-381-3801 (fax)
www.stillsecure.com
. . .
From ocraig at stillsecure.com Tue Jun 6 00:11:03 2006
From: ocraig at stillsecure.com (Ole Craig)
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 22:11:03 -0600
Subject: [rt-users] Can't bind: LDAP_INVALID_CREDENTIALS 49
In-Reply-To: <1149563267.25839.67.camel@hex.latis.com>
References:
<1149563267.25839.67.camel@hex.latis.com>
Message-ID: <1149567063.25839.72.camel@hex.latis.com>
On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 21:55 -0600, Ole Craig wrote:
[...]
> Error 49 is the generic LDAP error returned when the account you're
> using to bind (NOT the account you're trying to authenticate) has
> invalid credentials, usually a bad or expired password but not always.
> Active Directory returns a cryptic sub-error code:
>
> http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?forumID=51&threadID=658510
[...]
Hmm. That link has changed since I scraped it into an internal technote,
or else I pasted the wrong link. For anyone who might find it useful,
here's a more complete version, and my heartfelt thanks go to whomever
was the original poster on the java forum.
Following are the results of somebody's "experimentation" with a W2k
Domain Controller...
Common Active Directory LDAP bind errors:
80090308: LdapErr: DSID-0C09030B, comment: AcceptSecurityContext error, data 525, v893
HEX: 0x525 - user not found
DEC: 1317 - ERROR_NO_SUCH_USER (The specified account does not exist.)
NOTE: Returns when username is invalid.
80090308: LdapErr: DSID-0C09030B, comment: AcceptSecurityContext error, data 52e, v893
HEX: 0x52e - invalid credentials
DEC: 1326 - ERROR_LOGON_FAILURE (Logon failure: unknown user name or bad password.)
NOTE: Returns when username is valid but password/credential is invalid. Will prevent most other errors from being displayed as noted.
80090308: LdapErr: DSID-0C09030B, comment: AcceptSecurityContext error, data 530, v893
HEX: 0x530 - not permitted to logon at this time
DEC: 1328 - ERROR_INVALID_LOGON_HOURS (Logon failure: account logon time restriction violation.)
NOTE: Returns only when presented with valid username and password/credential.
80090308: LdapErr: DSID-0C09030B, comment: AcceptSecurityContext error, data 531, v893
HEX: 0x531 - not permitted to logon from this workstation
DEC: 1329 - ERROR_INVALID_WORKSTATION (Logon failure: user not allowed to log on to this computer.)
LDAP[userWorkstations: ]
NOTE: Returns only when presented with valid username and password/credential.
80090308: LdapErr: DSID-0C09030B, comment: AcceptSecurityContext error, data 532, v893
HEX: 0x532 - password expired
DEC: 1330 - ERROR_PASSWORD_EXPIRED (Logon failure: the specified account password has expired.)
LDAP[userAccountControl: ] - PASSWORDEXPIRED
NOTE: Returns only when presented with valid username and password/credential.
80090308: LdapErr: DSID-0C09030B, comment: AcceptSecurityContext error, data 533, v893
HEX: 0x533 - account disabled
DEC: 1331 - ERROR_ACCOUNT_DISABLED (Logon failure: account currently disabled.)
LDAP[userAccountControl: ] - ACCOUNTDISABLE
NOTE: Returns only when presented with valid username and password/credential.
80090308: LdapErr: DSID-0C09030B, comment: AcceptSecurityContext error, data 701, v893
HEX: 0x701 - account expired
DEC: 1793 - ERROR_ACCOUNT_EXPIRED (The user's account has expired.)
LDAP[accountExpires: ] - ACCOUNTEXPIRED
NOTE: Returns only when presented with valid username and password/credential.
80090308: LdapErr: DSID-0C09030B, comment: AcceptSecurityContext error, data 773, v893
HEX: 0x773 - user must reset password
DEC: 1907 - ERROR_PASSWORD_MUST_CHANGE (The user's password must be changed before logging on the first time.)
LDAP[pwdLastSet: ] - MUST_CHANGE_PASSWD
NOTE: Returns only when presented with valid username and password/credential.
80090308: LdapErr: DSID-0C09030B, comment: AcceptSecurityContext error, data 775, v893
HEX: 0x775 - account locked out
DEC: 1909 - ERROR_ACCOUNT_LOCKED_OUT (The referenced account is currently locked out and may not be logged on to.)
LDAP[userAccountControl: ] - LOCKOUT
NOTE: Returns even if invalid password is presented
--
/Ole Craig
Security Engineer
303-381-3802 (main support hotline)
303-381-3824 (my direct line)
303-381-3801 (fax)
www.stillsecure.com
. . .
From purp at acm.org Tue Jun 6 03:34:05 2006
From: purp at acm.org (Jim Meyer)
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 00:34:05 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] Can't bind: LDAP_INVALID_CREDENTIALS 49
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID:
Hello!
Bless you for all the precise information below. =]
On 6/5/06, Wade Naveja wrote:
> I'm running Request Tracker 3.4.5 on a FreeBSD 5.4 server with Apache
> 1.3.34 and MySQL 4.1.13. The installation went smooth, and my team is
> very happy with RT over our current home brew ticketing application.
>
> I'm running into trouble with LDAP authentication against a Windows 2003
> domain controller. I've followed the
> instructions found at:
>
> http://wiki.bestpractical.com/?LDAP
> http://wiki.bestpractical.com/index.cgi?LdapUserLocalOverlay
> http://wiki.bestpractical.com/index.cgi?LdapSiteConfigSettings
>
> I've got loggin cranked up, and I'm seeing the following:
>
> [Tue Jun 6 01:51:01 2006] [critical]: RT::User::LookupExternalUserInfo
> Can't bind: LDAP_INVALID_CREDENTIALS 49
> (/usr/local/rt3/lib/RT/User_Local.pm:475)
Hmmm. I'm hoping that Ole's messages were helpful to you as my only
guess is that your LDAP server (aka AD server) won't accept anonymous
(unauthenticated) bindings. Here's the code in and around the
complaining line:
my $msg = undef;
if ($ldap_user) {
$msg = $ldap->bind($ldap_user, password => $ldap_pass);
} else {
$msg = $ldap->bind;
}
unless ($msg->code == LDAP_SUCCESS) {
$RT::Logger->critical((caller(0))[3], "Can't bind:",
ldap_error_name($msg->code), $msg->code);
} else {
...
Have you set LdapUser and LdapPass in RT_SiteConfig.pm? If not, try
setting them to a user/pass combo that should allow you to bind to the
server and let me know how it goes.
Thanks!
--j
--
Jim Meyer, Geek at Large purp at acm.org
From purp at acm.org Tue Jun 6 03:39:06 2006
From: purp at acm.org (Jim Meyer)
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 00:39:06 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] LDAP Overlay Update: v1.1b1,
with Account Information AutoRefresh
Message-ID:
Hello!
I've just made v1.1b1 (code name: "Punch-Drunk Hamster") of the LDAP
overlay available. It adds one frequently requested feature: automatic
update of RT account info from LDAP. Presently, it only refreshes the
info when the user logs in, but I'm hoping to find other sane points
to cause the autorefresh to happen.
Also, with v1.1b1 came a big refactor of User_Local.pm. For various
bizarre reasons, I can't test the code I've posted; it has to do with
the unusual way in which our internal LDAP servers are configured.
Please download and test this code and shout out when you find a bug;
I'd like to nail them all quickly, then give this code some time to
mature.
Thanks!
--j
--
Jim Meyer, Geek at Large purp at acm.org
From brendanarnold at gmail.com Tue Jun 6 08:41:09 2006
From: brendanarnold at gmail.com (Brendan Arnold)
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 13:41:09 +0100
Subject: [rt-users] Lack of trailing slash causing porblems in IE
In-Reply-To: <5ed41c130606020502r17886dek5994d931e7bbdb5f@mail.gmail.com>
References:
<5ed41c130605220229v616dc65bu87e9b8a9c9592cfe@mail.gmail.com>
<5ed41c130606010841l1a106e01r3b20bff47e7ab08f@mail.gmail.com>
<5ed41c130606020502r17886dek5994d931e7bbdb5f@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5ed41c130606060541i7701237m8ca1222ada9a96a5@mail.gmail.com>
For those that (very reasonably) don't want to disable SSLv3 then try
doing the steps outlines on the mod_ssl FAQ,
http://www.modssl.org/docs/2.8/ssl_faq.html#ToC49
I am going to try this rather than disabling SSLv3 altogether and will
let you know.
Brendan
From mnichols at wayport.net Tue Jun 6 09:43:18 2006
From: mnichols at wayport.net (Matt Nichols)
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 08:43:18 -0500
Subject: [rt-users] rt-mailgate on different server than RT
Message-ID: <52AD365BD79BA048B359E3F4411D45150DE7DFA4@exchange01.wayad.corp.wayport.net>
Hello,
Is it possible to run rt-mailgate on a separate server than RT? I'd like
to run rt-mailgate on our mail server and have it talk to the RT server.
How is rt-mailgate on the mail server going to know how to authenticate
to the RT web interface in order to comment on tickets? Can I create an
rt-mailgate config somewhere with a username and password for it to use
when connecting to the RT web interface?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From bkurowsky at hotmail.com Tue Jun 6 09:54:39 2006
From: bkurowsky at hotmail.com (Brian Kurowsky)
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 09:54:39 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Re: Can't call method "Scheme" on an undefined value at
...
Message-ID:
No, the ticket exists.
What's happening is when I hit the "submit" button to update a ticket that
has the "Refers to:" side of the linked tickets, I get the error below --
but the ticket still updates.
When I go to update the ticket on the "Referred to by:" side of the linked
tickets, all is good.
Also, it's only when the link refers to another ticket. When the "Refers
to:" side points to an article in RTFM, I get no error.
Thanks,
Brian
On 5/27/06 Ruslan Zakirov wrote:
>Could be that link points to object that doesn't exist? Turn on
>ogging and reload page. You should see other errors before the one
>you're seeing.
>
>Also did you use shredder? I've found one bug in it that may be a
>source of your problem.
>
>On 5/9/06, Brian Kurowsky wrote:
>>I receive the following error when attempting to update a ticket that has
>>a
>>link to another ticket in the "Refers to: " section.
>>
>>error: Can't call method "Scheme" on an undefined value at
>>/usr/share/request-tracker3.4/lib/RT/Ticket_Overlay.pm line 2581.
>>
>>context: ...
>>2577: elsif ( $args{'Base'} ) {
>>2578: $other_ticket_uri->FromURI( $args{'Base'} );
> >2579: }
> >2580:
> >2581: if ( $other_ticket_uri->Resolver->Scheme eq 'fsck.com-rt') {
> >2582: my $object = $other_ticket_uri->Resolver->Object;
> >2583:
> >2584: if ( UNIVERSAL::isa( $object, 'RT::Ticket' )
> >2585: && $object->id
> >...
> >code stack: /usr/share/request-tracker3.4/lib/RT/Ticket_Overlay.pm:2581
> >/usr/share/request-tracker3.4/lib/RT/Ticket_Overlay.pm:2552
> >/usr/share/request-tracker3.4/lib/RT/Interface/Web.pm:1464
> >/usr/share/request-tracker3.4/lib/RT/Interface/Web.pm:1414
> >/usr/share/request-tracker3.4/html/Ticket/Display.html:141
> >/usr/share/request-tracker3.4/html/Ticket/Update.html:211
> >/usr/share/request-tracker3.4/html/autohandler:215
>>
>>
>>
>>I am, however, able to update the other ticket (Refers to by:) with no
>>problem.
>>
>>Running 3.4.1 on Debian Sarge. w/ RTFM 2.1.37
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Brian
>>
>>
From scoutts at bcs.org.uk Tue Jun 6 09:48:49 2006
From: scoutts at bcs.org.uk (Steven Coutts)
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 14:48:49 +0100
Subject: [rt-users] Trouble logging in
Message-ID: <200606061448.49705.scoutts@bcs.org.uk>
I can't login to my RT system anymore.
This is what is in the apache 2 error_log -:
-- [Tue Jun 06 14:46:52 2006] [notice] Apache configured -- resuming normal
operations
[Tue Jun 06 14:46:53 2006] [warn] FastCGI:
server "/var/www/localhost/rt-3.4.5/bin/mason_handler.fcgi" (uid 10001, gid
443) started (pid 12330)
[Tue Jun 06 14:46:54 2006] [warn] FastCGI:
server "/var/www/localhost/rt-3.4.5/bin/mason_handler.fcgi" (uid 10001, gid
443) started (pid 13109)
[Tue Jun 06 14:46:55 2006] [warn] FastCGI:
server "/var/www/localhost/rt-3.4.5/bin/mason_handler.fcgi" (uid 10001, gid
443) started (pid 17435)
Out of memory!
[Tue Jun 06 14:47:08 2006] [error] [client 10.130.36.42] FastCGI: incomplete
headers (0 bytes) received from
server "/var/www/localhost/rt-3.4.5/bin/mason_handler.fcgi"
[Tue Jun 06 14:47:08 2006] [warn] FastCGI:
server "/var/www/localhost/rt-3.4.5/bin/mason_handler.fcgi" (pid 797)
terminated by calling exit with status '1'
[Tue Jun 06 14:47:08 2006] [warn] FastCGI:
server "/var/www/localhost/rt-3.4.5/bin/mason_handler.fcgi" (uid 10001, gid
443) restarted (pid 9081)
I am at a loss at to what is wrong here!
Any ideas ?
Regards
--
Steven Coutts B.Sc.(Hons) MBCS
scoutts at bcs.org.uk
PGP Public Key
From thrall.mail.list at gmail.com Tue Jun 6 11:00:24 2006
From: thrall.mail.list at gmail.com (Nadeem Shahbaz)
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 20:00:24 +0500
Subject: [rt-users] rt-mailgate on different server than RT
In-Reply-To: <52AD365BD79BA048B359E3F4411D45150DE7DFA4@exchange01.wayad.corp.wayport.net>
References: <52AD365BD79BA048B359E3F4411D45150DE7DFA4@exchange01.wayad.corp.wayport.net>
Message-ID: <44859888.3000604@gmail.com>
Matt Nichols, on 2006-06-06 6:43 PM +0500, wrote :
> Is it possible to run rt-mailgate on a separate server than RT?
at http://wiki.bestpractical.com/index.cgi?ManualInstallation, see
SETTING UP THE MAIL GATEWAY section
Nadeem
From tomw at bnl.gov Tue Jun 6 11:01:14 2006
From: tomw at bnl.gov (Tomasz Wlodek)
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 11:01:14 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [rt-users] How can a regular user see which groups he is a member?
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID:
Is it possible for a RT user to be able to see in which groups he is a
member?
Tomasz Wlodek | tel 631-344-7448
Brookhaven Laboratory, Building 510M | fax 631-344-7616
Upton NY 11973-5000 |
From timothy-flynn at uiowa.edu Tue Jun 6 11:46:07 2006
From: timothy-flynn at uiowa.edu (Flynn, Timothy J)
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 10:46:07 -0500
Subject: [rt-users] Merge User Function?
Message-ID:
RT 3.4.5
When a user is autocreated from an email and then later tries to login
through the web the email address cannot be added since it already
exists for a different user. Is there a way to merge the two user
accounts to show that they are one in the same? Since tickets may be
associated to the autocreated account I can't really just deactivate
that account and move it to the appropriate user.
Thanks,
-Tim
From ali.bouirmane at marocconnect.com Tue Jun 6 11:52:55 2006
From: ali.bouirmane at marocconnect.com (Mohamed Ali Bouirmane)
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 15:52:55 -0000
Subject: [rt-users] set default priority
Message-ID: <200606061553.k56Fr2705765@marocconnect.com>
Hi,
I want to set a default priority when a user (support level 1) create ticket
in specific queue .
And
I want to set a priority when users select a value in custom field
How can I do via scrip .?
Best Regards
Ali
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From payerle at physics.umd.edu Tue Jun 6 12:51:39 2006
From: payerle at physics.umd.edu (Thomas M. Payerle)
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 12:51:39 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [rt-users] Re: rt-mailgate on different server than RT
In-Reply-To: <20060606141712.1FF654D816F@diesel.bestpractical.com>
References: <20060606141712.1FF654D816F@diesel.bestpractical.com>
Message-ID:
> Is it possible to run rt-mailgate on a separate server than RT? I'd like
> to run rt-mailgate on our mail server and have it talk to the RT server.
> How is rt-mailgate on the mail server going to know how to authenticate
> to the RT web interface in order to comment on tickets? Can I create an
> rt-mailgate config somewhere with a username and password for it to use
> when connecting to the RT web interface?
Can most definitely be done.
My understanding is that the rt-mailgate script uses some part of the
HTML document tree which does not require authentication (./REST/... IIRC),
so I believe in general you do not need an RT username/password for the mailgate
script.
In my case, we use web server rather than RT authentication (RT does
authorization based on user logging into the web server), and I needed to
give explicit permission to the IP address of the mail server to access the
pages without logging into the web server (which would require a normal
login account on the Unix system). But I do not believe is needed for more
standard setups.
Tom Payerle
Dept of Physics payerle at physics.umd.edu
University of Maryland (301) 405-6973
College Park, MD 20742-4111 Fax: (301) 314-9525
From ali.bouirmane at marocconnect.com Tue Jun 6 14:53:14 2006
From: ali.bouirmane at marocconnect.com (Mohamed Ali Bouirmane)
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 18:53:14 -0000
Subject: [rt-users] Scrip doesn't work
Message-ID: <200606061853.k56IrM708143@marocconnect.com>
Hi all,
I have some troubles running scrips with a new RT 3.4.5 installation. I've
tried many samples found in the RT wiki but the result is always the same:
the scrip action is not triggered.
here is an example of scrip tested:
http://wiki.bestpractical.com/index.cgi?ResolveTicket
Best Regards
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From wade at naveja.net Tue Jun 6 15:57:52 2006
From: wade at naveja.net (Wade Naveja)
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 12:57:52 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [rt-users] Can't bind: LDAP_INVALID_CREDENTIALS 49
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID:
Jim - Thanks for the feedback. I'm sure you're right about the AD server
not accepting anonymous binding.
I've got the values populated for
LdapUser and LdapPass. We have a service account that we use for Apache
LDAP authentication, so the username/password are definitely valid.
I'm wondering if this bit from my RT_SiteConfig.pm looks okay:
# The basics; if set, these override $RT::LdapAuth* and $RT::LdapInfo*
Set($LdapServer, 'server.example.com');
Set($LdapBase, 'cn=Users,dc=subdomain,dc=example,dc=com');
Set($LdapFilter, "(objectclass=user)");
Set($LdapUser, 'genericid');
Set($LdapPass, 'sekrit_password');
Any suggestions?
Regards,
Wade Naveja
On Tue, 6 Jun 2006, Jim Meyer wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Bless you for all the precise information below. =]
>
> On 6/5/06, Wade Naveja wrote:
> > I'm running Request Tracker 3.4.5 on a FreeBSD 5.4 server with Apache
> > 1.3.34 and MySQL 4.1.13. The installation went smooth, and my team is
> > very happy with RT over our current home brew ticketing application.
> >
> > I'm running into trouble with LDAP authentication against a Windows 2003
> > domain controller. I've followed the
> > instructions found at:
> >
> > http://wiki.bestpractical.com/?LDAP
> > http://wiki.bestpractical.com/index.cgi?LdapUserLocalOverlay
> > http://wiki.bestpractical.com/index.cgi?LdapSiteConfigSettings
> >
> > I've got loggin cranked up, and I'm seeing the following:
> >
> > [Tue Jun 6 01:51:01 2006] [critical]: RT::User::LookupExternalUserInfo
> > Can't bind: LDAP_INVALID_CREDENTIALS 49
> > (/usr/local/rt3/lib/RT/User_Local.pm:475)
>
> Hmmm. I'm hoping that Ole's messages were helpful to you as my only
> guess is that your LDAP server (aka AD server) won't accept anonymous
> (unauthenticated) bindings. Here's the code in and around the
> complaining line:
>
> my $msg = undef;
> if ($ldap_user) {
> $msg = $ldap->bind($ldap_user, password => $ldap_pass);
> } else {
> $msg = $ldap->bind;
> }
>
> unless ($msg->code == LDAP_SUCCESS) {
> $RT::Logger->critical((caller(0))[3], "Can't bind:",
> ldap_error_name($msg->code), $msg->code);
> } else {
> ...
>
> Have you set LdapUser and LdapPass in RT_SiteConfig.pm? If not, try
> setting them to a user/pass combo that should allow you to bind to the
> server and let me know how it goes.
>
> Thanks!
>
> --j
> --
> Jim Meyer, Geek at Large purp at acm.org
>
From pape-rt at inf.fu-berlin.de Tue Jun 6 15:33:51 2006
From: pape-rt at inf.fu-berlin.de (Dirk Pape)
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 21:33:51 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] set default priority
In-Reply-To: <200606061553.k56Fr2705765@marocconnect.com>
References: <200606061553.k56Fr2705765@marocconnect.com>
Message-ID:
Hello,
--Am 6. Juni 2006 15:52:55 +0000 schrieb Mohamed Ali Bouirmane
:
> I want to set a default priority when a user (support level 1) create
> ticket in specific queue .
>
> And
>
> I want to set a priority when users select a value in custom field
i can send you an example (attached) of a scrip we test with, it adjusts
priority of a ticket if specific custom fields of the tickets are set.
With this scrip we experiment calculating priority automatically from
queue's initial and final priority and custom field values for
Dringlichkeit (urgency) and Wichtigkeit (importance). Not yet ready for
production but might help you as example.
Regards, Dirk.
-------------- next part --------------
Condition: On Transcation
Custom action preparation code:
my $type = $self->TransactionObj->Type;
return(0) unless $type eq "CustomField" or $type eq "Create";
return(1);
Custom action cleanup code:
my $ticket = $self->TicketObj;
my $queue = $ticket->QueueObj;
my $wichtig = $ticket->FirstCustomFieldValue("Wichtigkeit");
my $dringlich = $ticket->FirstCustomFieldValue("Dringlichkeit");
my $minprio = $queue->InitialPriority;
my $maxprio = $queue->FinalPriority;
my %w_value = ( "niedrig" => 0, "mittel" => 1, "hoch" => 2 );
my %d_value = ( "klein" => 0, "mittel" => 1, "hoch" => 2 );
my $d_weight = ($maxprio - $minprio) / 3;
my $w_weight = $d_weight / 3;
my $d = $d_value{$dringlich} || 0;
my $w = $w_value{$wichtig} || 0;
my $prio = $minprio + $d_weight * $d_value{$dringlich} + $w_weight *
$w_value{$wichtig};
$RT::Logger->info("would set Prio $prio by Dringlichkeit
".$d_value{$dringlich}." and Wichtigkeit ".$w_value{$wichtig});
$ticket->_Set(Field => "Priority", Value => $prio, RecordTransaction => 0);
$RT::Logger->info("Prio is now ".$ticket->Priority);
return(1);
From wade at naveja.net Tue Jun 6 17:35:19 2006
From: wade at naveja.net (Wade Naveja)
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 14:35:19 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [rt-users] Can't bind: LDAP_INVALID_CREDENTIALS 49
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID:
I found my mistake. My RT_SiteConfig.pm contained the following:
Set($LdapBase, 'cn=Users,dc=subdomain,dc=example,dc=com');
Set($LdapUser, 'genericid');
Changing those lines to something like this worked:
Set($LdapBase, 'dc=subdomain,dc=example,dc=com');
Set($LdapUser, 'cn=genericid,cn=Users,dc=subdomain,dc=example,dc=com');
Thanks for the guidance. Now, on to other RT configuration issues!
Regards,
Wade Naveja
On Tue, 6 Jun 2006, Wade Naveja wrote:
> Jim - Thanks for the feedback. I'm sure you're right about the AD server
> not accepting anonymous binding.
>
> I've got the values populated for
> LdapUser and LdapPass. We have a service account that we use for Apache
> LDAP authentication, so the username/password are definitely valid.
>
> I'm wondering if this bit from my RT_SiteConfig.pm looks okay:
>
> # The basics; if set, these override $RT::LdapAuth* and $RT::LdapInfo*
> Set($LdapServer, 'server.example.com');
> Set($LdapBase, 'cn=Users,dc=subdomain,dc=example,dc=com');
> Set($LdapFilter, "(objectclass=user)");
> Set($LdapUser, 'genericid');
> Set($LdapPass, 'sekrit_password');
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> Regards,
>
> Wade Naveja
>
From pkime at Shopzilla.com Tue Jun 6 17:59:52 2006
From: pkime at Shopzilla.com (Philip Kime)
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 14:59:52 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] RT 3.6rc3 looks odd and I can't get the 3.4-compat to do
anything ...
Message-ID: <58B1112F0EEB7349AE14A0AA46F9CEC00137ABCB@szexchange.Shopzilla.inc>
Any ideas? The new layout looks strange - is there supposed to be a left
frame like before? It seems so but both Firefox and IE give me one frame
with the menu stuff at the top. I set the 3.4-compat variable in
RT_SiteConfig.pm but it doesn't seem to do anything ...
I've cleared the Mason cache and restarte apache etc. several times.
PK
--
Philip Kime
NOPS Systems Architect
310 401 0407
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From lvanderf at internode.com.au Tue Jun 6 19:07:30 2006
From: lvanderf at internode.com.au (Luke Vanderfluit)
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 08:37:30 +0930
Subject: [rt-users] mysqldump refusing to finish
Message-ID: <44860AB2.5050806@internode.com.au>
Hi.
I have a cron job that does a database backup for RT.
That backup is currently failing with the following error:
mysqldump: Error 2020: Got packet bigger than 'max_allowed_packet' bytes when dumping table `Attachments` at row: 1784599
My mysqldump command looks like this:
/usr/local/mysql/bin/mysqldump --opt --skip-extended-insert
--skip-lock-tables --single-transaction --complete-insert
--max_allowed_packet=32M rt3 | bzip2 -9 > rt3.out-`date +\%Y\%m\%d-\%H`.bz2
I could increase the 'max_allowed_packet' setting.
I could add '--default-character-set=binary'.
Would these help?
Does anyone have any other suggestions?
Kind regards.
--
Luke Vanderfluit.
Analyst/Programmer.
Internode Systems Pty. Ltd.
From ocraig at stillsecure.com Tue Jun 6 19:22:22 2006
From: ocraig at stillsecure.com (Ole Craig)
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 17:22:22 -0600
Subject: [rt-users] mysqldump refusing to finish
In-Reply-To: <44860AB2.5050806@internode.com.au>
References: <44860AB2.5050806@internode.com.au>
Message-ID: <1149636142.26811.42.camel@hex.latis.com>
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 08:37 +0930, Luke Vanderfluit wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I have a cron job that does a database backup for RT.
> That backup is currently failing with the following error:
>
> mysqldump: Error 2020: Got packet bigger than 'max_allowed_packet' bytes when dumping table `Attachments` at row: 1784599
>
> My mysqldump command looks like this:
>
> /usr/local/mysql/bin/mysqldump --opt --skip-extended-insert
> --skip-lock-tables --single-transaction --complete-insert
> --max_allowed_packet=32M rt3 | bzip2 -9 > rt3.out-`date +\%Y\%m\%d-\%H`.bz2
recent mysqldump versions do some funky things with combining insert
statements. Your "--max_allowed_packet=32M" should match what you have
defined for that variable in /etc/my.cnf, and to be on the safe side I'd
check that your running mysql instance is using the value you think it
is:
mysql rt3 -e 'show variables;' | grep max_allowed_packet
...and I'd also add the following to your mysqldump command:
-O net_buffer_length=32M
(presuming that your max_allowed_packet size is actually 32M. I thought
the ceiling was 16M, but I'm no mysql DBA.)
--
/Ole Craig
Security Engineer
303-381-3802 (main support hotline)
303-381-3824 (my direct line)
303-381-3801 (fax)
www.stillsecure.com
. . .
From purp at acm.org Tue Jun 6 21:07:41 2006
From: purp at acm.org (Jim Meyer)
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 18:07:41 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] Fwd: RT LDAP
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID:
Once more, this time actually headed to the rt-users list. =\
--j
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jim Meyer
Date: Jun 6, 2006 6:06 PM
Subject: Re: RT LDAP
To: Steve Hach?
Hello!
I'm copying the rt-users list because your errors don't look
particularly LDAP-related -- not to say they aren't, just that I've
never seen them before.
First question: did you install my most recent code (~1a last night)
or from earlier? There shouldn't be a difference (and don't upgrade
yet if you're not running last night's code), it's just to help figure
out what's wrong.
Second question: what version of RT?
On 6/6/06, Steve Hach? wrote:
> I also installed the LdapAutocreateAuthCallback file.
Since that's optional, let's move that to Auth.bak for now to
decomplicate the issue. Then we'll test with some LDAP user who
already has an RT account.
> However I am not having luck getting that one to work off the bat.
> Here is what my logs are showing. fred.smith is not a valid user in our
> office, but andre is.
>
> Jun 6 14:21:40 srv01 RT: Transaction->Create couldn't, as you didn't
> specify an object type and id
> (/usr/local/rt3/lib/RT/Record.pm:1441)
> Jun 6 14:21:40 srv01 RT: Transaction->Create couldn't, as you didn't
> specify an object type and id
> (/usr/local/rt3/lib/RT/Record.pm:1441)
> Jun 6 14:21:40 srv01 RT: FAILED LOGIN for fred.smith from 192.168.255.1
> (/usr/local/rt3/share/html/autohandler:191)
> Jun 6 14:26:02 srv01 RT: Transaction->Create couldn't, as you didn't
> specify an object type and id
> (/usr/local/rt3/lib/RT/Record.pm:1441)
> Jun 6 14:26:02 srv01 RT: Transaction->Create couldn't, as you didn't
> specify an object type and id
> (/usr/local/rt3/lib/RT/Record.pm:1441)
> Jun 6 14:26:02 srv01 RT: FAILED LOGIN for andre_belanger from 192.168.255.1
> (/usr/local/rt3/share/html/autohandler:191)
These don't look like errors I've seen before. Let's keep digging.
> Set($LdapAttrMap, {'Name' => 'SAMAccountName',
> 'EmailAddress' => 'mail',
> 'Organization' => 'o',
> 'RealName' => 'cn',
> 'ExternalContactInfoId' => 'dn',
> 'ExternalAuthId' => 'SAMAccountName',
> 'Gecos' => 'SAMAccountName',
> 'WorkPhone' => 'telephoneNumber',
> 'Address1' => 'streetAddress',
> 'City' => '1',
> 'State' => 'st',
> 'Zip' => 'postalCode',
> 'Country' => 'co'}
> );
[...]
> # The basics; if set, these override $RT::LdapAuth* and $RT::LdapInfo*
> Set($LdapServer, 'LDAP IP HERE');
> Set($LdapBase, 'ou=users,dc=corp,dc=distributel,dc=ca');
> Set($LdapFilter, "(objectclass=SAMAccountName)");
I think it's supposed to be "sAMAccountName", but I don't know if
Windows Active Directory is case sensitive or not.
If that doesn't solve it, please turn logging up to "debug" and send
more output. =]
Thanks!
--j
--
Jim Meyer, Geek at Large purp at acm.org
--
Jim Meyer, Geek at Large purp at acm.org
From ocraig at stillsecure.com Tue Jun 6 21:23:11 2006
From: ocraig at stillsecure.com (Ole Craig)
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 19:23:11 -0600
Subject: [rt-users] Fwd: RT LDAP
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID: <1149643391.26811.70.camel@hex.latis.com>
On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 18:07 -0700, Jim Meyer wrote:
[...]
> I think it's supposed to be "sAMAccountName", but I don't know if
> Windows Active Directory is case sensitive or not.
[...]
Some quick experimentation with ldapsearch says it's not, but (based on
some fairly painful experience troubleshooting one of our products that
includes user import from LDAP as an option) I suspect you want
"organizationalPerson" as the object class; "sAMAccountName" is usually
an attribute of an organizationalPerson object.
--
/Ole Craig
Security Engineer
303-381-3802 (main support hotline)
303-381-3824 (my direct line)
303-381-3801 (fax)
www.stillsecure.com
. . .
From purp at acm.org Tue Jun 6 21:25:32 2006
From: purp at acm.org (Jim Meyer)
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 18:25:32 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] Fwd: RT LDAP
In-Reply-To: <1149643391.26811.70.camel@hex.latis.com>
References:
<1149643391.26811.70.camel@hex.latis.com>
Message-ID:
Hello!
On 6/6/06, Ole Craig wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 18:07 -0700, Jim Meyer wrote:
> [...]
> > I think it's supposed to be "sAMAccountName", but I don't know if
> > Windows Active Directory is case sensitive or not.
> [...]
>
> Some quick experimentation with ldapsearch says it's not, but (based on
> some fairly painful experience troubleshooting one of our products that
> includes user import from LDAP as an option) I suspect you want
> "organizationalPerson" as the object class; "sAMAccountName" is usually
> an attribute of an organizationalPerson object.
Can some enterprising WAD user try this and confirm it? I'd like to
update he wiki if it's true.
Thanks!
--j
--
Jim Meyer, Geek at Large purp at acm.org
From ocraig at stillsecure.com Tue Jun 6 21:50:45 2006
From: ocraig at stillsecure.com (Ole Craig)
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 19:50:45 -0600
Subject: [rt-users] 3.6.0rc3/mysql: reinserting image attachments into the
DB?
Message-ID: <1149645045.26811.83.camel@hex.latis.com>
Background: Startups being what they are, I had to shove my RT
installation out the aircraft door long before I felt ready, hoping the
chute was in working order... I don't currently have hardware for a test
system; when I have to tweak RT, I'm sometimes forced to do a mysqldump
and then restore from the dump after testing changes. After one such
dump/change/test/restore sequence, I noticed that any images attached to
existing tickets had been corrupted, probably because before today I'd
not thought to specify the "-O --hex-blob=TRUE" option to mysqldump. If
you're curious as to what happened to the images, a sample
before-and-after:
http://www.cs.umass.edu/~olc/original-email-image.jpg
http://www.cs.umass.edu/~olc/corrupted-RT-image.jpg
(latter image has been GIMPed to obfuscate of innocent bystanders and
their support requests, ignore the black blotches. It's the psychedelia
that's the problem.)
My question: I still have all the emails from which those image
attachments were culled. Does anyone have a suggestion for how to
reinsert the uncorrupted images into the database in place of the
useless blobs currently residing there? (I'm no DBA at the best of
times, and I've never needed to work with non-textual data in mysql
before; I'm feeling a bit lost...)
Thanks,
Ole
--
/Ole Craig
Security Engineer
303-381-3802 (main support hotline)
303-381-3824 (my direct line)
303-381-3801 (fax)
www.stillsecure.com
. . .
From lvanderf at internode.com.au Wed Jun 7 00:17:12 2006
From: lvanderf at internode.com.au (Luke Vanderfluit)
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 13:47:12 +0930
Subject: [rt-users] more than 1 instance of RT talking to an RT database
Message-ID: <44865348.5060403@internode.com.au>
Hi.
I have the following setup
MACHINE1(RT/Apache)<------------>MACHINE2(Mysql)
RT instance running on different machine to database
I want to test the following:
MACHINE1(RT/Apache)<------------>MACHINE2(Mysql)/MACHINE2(RT/Apache)
2 different instances of RT. One on a separate machine, one on the same
machine as the database
and the following
MACHINE1(RT/Apache)<------------>MACHINE2(Mysql)<--------->MACHINE3(RT/Apache)
2 different instances of RT. Both on a separate machine to the database.
Does anyone have experience with these setups?
Thanks.
Kind regards.
--
Luke Vanderfluit.
Analyst/Programmer.
Internode Systems Pty. Ltd.
From todd at chaka.net Wed Jun 7 00:23:05 2006
From: todd at chaka.net (Todd Chapman)
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 00:23:05 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] more than 1 instance of RT talking to an RT database
In-Reply-To: <44865348.5060403@internode.com.au>
References: <44865348.5060403@internode.com.au>
Message-ID: <20060607042305.GE26200@chaka.net>
Multiple RT web instances can hit the same RT database.
No problem.
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 01:47:12PM +0930, Luke Vanderfluit wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I have the following setup
>
>
> MACHINE1(RT/Apache)<------------>MACHINE2(Mysql)
> RT instance running on different machine to database
>
>
> I want to test the following:
> MACHINE1(RT/Apache)<------------>MACHINE2(Mysql)/MACHINE2(RT/Apache)
> 2 different instances of RT. One on a separate machine, one on the same
> machine as the database
>
>
> and the following
>
> MACHINE1(RT/Apache)<------------>MACHINE2(Mysql)<--------->MACHINE3(RT/Apache)
> 2 different instances of RT. Both on a separate machine to the database.
>
> Does anyone have experience with these setups?
> Thanks.
> Kind regards.
>
>
> --
> Luke Vanderfluit.
> Analyst/Programmer.
> Internode Systems Pty. Ltd.
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
>
>
> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>
>
> We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical:
> http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
From jcolson at voidgate.org Wed Jun 7 02:13:55 2006
From: jcolson at voidgate.org (Joshua Colson)
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 23:13:55 -0700 (MST)
Subject: [rt-users] 3.6.0rc3/mysql: reinserting image attachments into
the DB?
In-Reply-To: <1149645045.26811.83.camel@hex.latis.com>
References: <1149645045.26811.83.camel@hex.latis.com>
Message-ID: <32914.192.168.37.73.1149660835.squirrel@mail.voidgate.org>
> My question: I still have all the emails from which those image
> attachments were culled. Does anyone have a suggestion for how to
> reinsert the uncorrupted images into the database in place of the
> useless blobs currently residing there? (I'm no DBA at the best of
> times, and I've never needed to work with non-textual data in mysql
> before; I'm feeling a bit lost...)
RT does not store attachments as BLOBs. All binary attachments are
converted to base64 encoding before insertion into the database. What you
want to do should be possible, but it will likely require a fair amount of
work to accomplish. You say that you aren't a DBA, but if you can run some
sql updates, you can fix your problem. First, you'll need to extract all
the images from your emails, then you'll have to figure out which image
goes with which ticket. This will be the hard part. The following SQL run
from the mysql command line tool should help pull the relevant information
together.
select
a.id as "Attachments.id",
a.Filename as "Attachments.Filename",
tr.id as "Transactions.id",
t.id as "Tickets.id",
t.Subject as "Tickets.Subject"
FROM
Attachments a,
Transactions tr,
Tickets t
WHERE
a.ContentType <> 'text/plain'
and
a.Filename is not NULL
and
a.TransactionId = tr.id
and
tr.ObjectType = 'RT::Ticket'
and
tr.ObjectId = t.id;
With that information in hand, you should be able to cross reference the
images you've extracted from the emails to the
tickets/transactions/attachments records in the database. Then, you'll
need to use some external utility such as perls MIME::Base64 module to
convert the images to base64 format. Then simply update the record with
the new data.
I hope I explained that clearly enough to get you where you would like to be.
Good luck, and make sure you back the system up before doing anything that
I've suggested! I should also mention that I have not tested any of this,
but it should all work, in theory.
--
Joshua Colson
From nmetrowsky at digitalglobe.com Wed Jun 7 10:30:16 2006
From: nmetrowsky at digitalglobe.com (Nick Metrowsky)
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 08:30:16 -0600
Subject: [rt-users] Generating e-mail when Ticket is moved
Message-ID:
Hi Everyone,
Is there a way to send an e-mail automatically when a ticket is moved to
another queue? Also, is there a way to send an e-mail automatically when
someone changes the ownership of the ticket to someone else?
Thank you for your help.
Take care!
Nick
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------
Nick Metrowsky
Consulting System Administrator
303-684-4785 Office
303-684-4100 Fax
nmetrowsky at digitalglobe.com
DigitalGlobe (r), An Imaging and Information Company
http://www.digitalglobe.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From jawalk00 at uky.edu Wed Jun 7 10:15:00 2006
From: jawalk00 at uky.edu (John A. Walker)
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 10:15:00 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Custom Field issue
In-Reply-To: <4483C3F9.4020607@wolfram.com>
Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20060607095013.01d03af0@ukmail1.uky.edu>
OK ... We are running RT 3.4.5 and I'm having trouble trying to achieve
something that we want to do. I think I'm close but I just need a little
help to get over the edge.
Basically, for specific queues, we have a custom field that contains a list
of users. The list of users is a list of people that can approve
tickets. When a user is selected an approval ticket is generated for the
specified user. If no one is selected (no value) then it creates the
ticket normally. This part works fine.
We realized that if someone might create the ticket initially not thinking
that it needs to be approved and then discover that it approval is
required. We wanted to make it so a user could go back and select an
approver and generate the approval request as it would if it were done at
the original creation of the ticket.
What I was thinking I could do is compare the old value of the custom field
with the current value of the custom field and if they had changed I could
return 1 and run the approval template. If this can be done, I would also
want to check to see if the new value was "no value" and if it were then I
would return 0.
I have searched the archives and can come up with stuff that is close but
nothing that actually does a check on the old value of a custom field
within the scrip. Part of the problem is that I'm not entirely sure what
the proper syntax of referring to the fields and their values. So if there
is some place that can give me a break down of how to do this that would be
great.
Here is the contents of the User Defined Condition as it works on the
creation of a ticket:
if (($self->TransactionObj->Type eq "Create") and
($self->TicketObj->FirstCustomFieldValue('Approval required by:') =~ /\w/)) {
return 1;
}
return 0;
Here is the contents of the template that is called by the above scrip:
===Create-Ticket: manager-approval
Subject: Approval of { $Tickets{'TOP'}->Subject() }
Queue: ___Approvals
Type: approval
Owner: { $Tickets{'TOP'}->FirstCustomFieldValue('Approval required
by:') }
Depended-On-By: { $Tickets{'TOP'}->Id() }
RefersTo: { $Tickets{'TOP'}->Id() }
Content: Please review and approve this request.
ENDOFCONTENT
I was attempting to add further checks in the scrip that basically look to
see if the transaction type is not equal to "Create" . If that was the
case then I would look at the custom field value ('Approval required by:')
and see if it had changed.
I sure hope someone has something I can run with. I don't even have to
have the complete answer. Just point me in the right direction. Any help
would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
John
From Chris.Covington at plusone.com Wed Jun 7 10:42:23 2006
From: Chris.Covington at plusone.com (Covington, Chris)
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 10:42:23 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] binary attachment corruption?
In-Reply-To: <20060601163432.GF8022@bestpractical.com>
References: <447CA534.2010709@ucrwcu.rwc.uc.edu>
<008301c68598$ee4154e0$0e14140a@ad.serreyn.com>
<20060601163432.GF8022@bestpractical.com>
Message-ID: <20060607144223.GA9232@grendel.plusone.com>
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 12:34:32PM -0400, Jesse Vincent wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 11:32:10AM -0500, Ted Serreyn wrote:
> > Interesting
> >
> >
> > mysqldump --all-databases --with-default-charset=binary >dump.test
> > mysqldump: unknown variable 'with-default-charset=binary'
> >
>
> My mistake. --default-character-set=name
Has anyone gotten this sorted out? I've upgraded to mysql 5.0.22 and I
still have this problem, so it must be in the configuration somewhere.
I've tried starting mysql with --character-set-server=binary and
--default-character-set=binary and the attachments are still corrupted
(with new tickets).
---
Chris Covington
IT
Plus One Health Management
75 Maiden Lane Suite 801
NY, NY 10038
646-312-6269
http://www.plusoneactive.com
From brendanarnold at gmail.com Wed Jun 7 11:44:58 2006
From: brendanarnold at gmail.com (Brendan Arnold)
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 16:44:58 +0100
Subject: [rt-users] Lack of trailing slash causing porblems in IE
In-Reply-To: <5ed41c130606060541i7701237m8ca1222ada9a96a5@mail.gmail.com>
References:
<5ed41c130605220229v616dc65bu87e9b8a9c9592cfe@mail.gmail.com>
<5ed41c130606010841l1a106e01r3b20bff47e7ab08f@mail.gmail.com>
<5ed41c130606020502r17886dek5994d931e7bbdb5f@mail.gmail.com>
<5ed41c130606060541i7701237m8ca1222ada9a96a5@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5ed41c130606070844g17365b97lde8ab4315014b65f@mail.gmail.com>
This seems to have solved the problem without the Draconian measure of
forcing SSLv2 connections.
RT connections are now updating consistently!
Brendan
From fpater at dca.net Wed Jun 7 11:47:26 2006
From: fpater at dca.net (Frank Pater)
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 11:47:26 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Generating e-mail when Ticket is moved
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID: <20060607154726.GA7717@staff.dca.net>
Hi Nick,
We've accomplished these without even writing any code. Create new global scrips:
For queue change:
Condition: On Queue Change
Action: Notify AdminCcs (or whatever is appropriate for your organization)
Template: Global template: Transaction
Stage: TransactionCreate
For owner change:
Condition: On Owner Change
Action: Notify Owner (this is the new owner... again, change as necessary)
Template: Global template: Transaction
Stage: TransactionCreate
Since the Actions and Conditions you're looking for are predefined in RT, you should be able to do anything similar to this without writing any Scrip code.
Sincerely,
Frank Pater
DCANet
http://www.dca.net
voice: 888-4-DCANET (888-432-2638)
fax: 302-426-6386
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 08:30:16AM -0600, Nick Metrowsky wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
>
>
> Is there a way to send an e-mail automatically when a ticket is moved to
> another queue? Also, is there a way to send an e-mail automatically when
> someone changes the ownership of the ticket to someone else?
>
>
>
> Thank you for your help.
>
>
>
> Take care!
>
>
>
> Nick
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Nick Metrowsky
>
> Consulting System Administrator
>
> 303-684-4785 Office
>
> 303-684-4100 Fax
>
> [1]nmetrowsky at digitalglobe.com
>
> DigitalGlobe (R), An Imaging and Information Company
>
> [2]http://www.digitalglobe.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> References
>
> Visible links
> 1. mailto:nmetrowsky at digitalglobe.com
> 2. http://www.digitalglobe.com/
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
>
>
> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>
>
> We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical: http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
From jauty at indiana.edu Wed Jun 7 14:09:33 2006
From: jauty at indiana.edu (Joe Auty)
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 14:09:33 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] RT 3.6.0rc2 not attempting email to requestors upon reply
Message-ID:
Hello,
When I go to reply to a ticket, RT does not even attempt to send
email out to the requestor's email address within version 3.6 - there
is no record at all in my mail log. Is this the intended behavior, or
a simple misconfiguration? If the latter, what needs to be corrected?
I can't seem to locate anything on the WIki...
-----------
Joe Auty
UITS Messaging
Indiana University
jauty at indiana.edu
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL:
From jauty at indiana.edu Wed Jun 7 14:33:12 2006
From: jauty at indiana.edu (Joe Auty)
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 14:33:12 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] RT 3.6.0rc2 not attempting email to requestors upon
reply
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID: <8FBAE125-3680-49EB-A659-FA5422C41A7E@indiana.edu>
If I were to wager a guess, it looks like the problem involves the
scrip:
On Correspond Notify Requestors and Ccs with template Correspondence
Is there some sort of way of verifying that this Scrip is working?
On Jun 7, 2006, at 2:09 PM, Joe Auty wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When I go to reply to a ticket, RT does not even attempt to send
> email out to the requestor's email address within version 3.6 -
> there is no record at all in my mail log. Is this the intended
> behavior, or a simple misconfiguration? If the latter, what needs
> to be corrected? I can't seem to locate anything on the WIki...
>
>
>
> -----------
> Joe Auty
> UITS Messaging
> Indiana University
> jauty at indiana.edu
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
>
>
> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>
>
> We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical: http://
> bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
-----------
Joe Auty
UITS Messaging
Indiana University
jauty at indiana.edu
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL:
From eric.valor at daimlerchrysler.com Wed Jun 7 13:49:30 2006
From: eric.valor at daimlerchrysler.com (eric.valor at daimlerchrysler.com)
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 10:49:30 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] Fwd: RT LDAP
In-Reply-To: <20060607061144.3E0174D81AB@diesel.bestpractical.com>
Message-ID:
I use a W2K AD server and use "user" as my object class. That works well
for me.
# Basic Setup
Set($LdapServer, 'server.domain.com'); # LDAP server for
authentication
Set($LdapBase, 'cn=Users,dc=domain,dc=com'); # search
base
Set($LdapFilter, "(objectclass=user)"); # filter
LDAP entries (e.g., only people)
I have also confirmed that SAMAccountName works equally as well as
sAMAccountName in the config.
--
Eric N. Valor
Sr. Systems Administrator
DaimlerChrysler Research & Technology North America, Inc.
eric.valor at daimlerchrysler.com
1510 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, CA 94304
CIMS 931-00-00
650-845-2536
: This Space Intentionally Left Blank :
From: Ole Craig
On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 18:07 -0700, Jim Meyer wrote:
[...]
> I think it's supposed to be "sAMAccountName", but I don't know if
> Windows Active Directory is case sensitive or not.
[...]
Some quick experimentation with ldapsearch says it's not, but (based on
some fairly painful experience troubleshooting one of our products that
includes user import from LDAP as an option) I suspect you want
"organizationalPerson" as the object class; "sAMAccountName" is usually
an attribute of an organizationalPerson object.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From todd at chaka.net Wed Jun 7 14:50:47 2006
From: todd at chaka.net (Todd Chapman)
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 14:50:47 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] RT 3.6.0rc2 not attempting email to requestors upon
reply
In-Reply-To: <8FBAE125-3680-49EB-A659-FA5422C41A7E@indiana.edu>
References:
<8FBAE125-3680-49EB-A659-FA5422C41A7E@indiana.edu>
Message-ID: <20060607185047.GF26200@chaka.net>
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 02:33:12PM -0400, Joe Auty wrote:
> If I were to wager a guess, it looks like the problem involves the
> scrip:
>
> On Correspond Notify Requestors and Ccs with template Correspondence
>
>
> Is there some sort of way of verifying that this Scrip is working?
>
Might this have something to do with $NotofyActor in RT_Config.pm?
From jauty at indiana.edu Wed Jun 7 14:50:05 2006
From: jauty at indiana.edu (Joe Auty)
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 14:50:05 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] RT 3.6.0rc2 not attempting email to requestors upon
reply
In-Reply-To: <20060607185047.GF26200@chaka.net>
References:
<8FBAE125-3680-49EB-A659-FA5422C41A7E@indiana.edu>
<20060607185047.GF26200@chaka.net>
Message-ID: <888A3FB0-C24B-44B8-BC71-E3CDE3E88630@indiana.edu>
Yes, it sure is!
A rather confusing default, but I should have looked in the config
file rather than the web interface... I was thinking this was more of
a permissions issue or something, as the feedback provided in the web
interface was a little confusing (listing the script it will trigger,
but not listing the email addresses - I didn't anticipate that I
should have expected the email addresses to be listed in addition to
the scrips)
Or, perhaps I'm just a dummy! =)
Thanks though!
On Jun 7, 2006, at 2:50 PM, Todd Chapman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 02:33:12PM -0400, Joe Auty wrote:
>> If I were to wager a guess, it looks like the problem involves the
>> scrip:
>>
>> On Correspond Notify Requestors and Ccs with template Correspondence
>>
>>
>> Is there some sort of way of verifying that this Scrip is working?
>>
>
> Might this have something to do with $NotofyActor in RT_Config.pm?
-----------
Joe Auty
UITS Messaging
Indiana University
jauty at indiana.edu
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL:
From ESchultz at corp.untd.com Wed Jun 7 15:38:28 2006
From: ESchultz at corp.untd.com (Schultz, Eric)
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 12:38:28 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] Strange message when changing "Select One Value" CFs
inRT 3.4.5
Message-ID: <5613F89D78D2F545A40423EBA5535C300FD1C4F3@LAXEVS01.lax.corp.int.untd.com>
Since I've made a number of other changes, I can't just give you a
patch. But yes, I thought it was a bug, and I fixed it thusly in
/path/to/your/rt/lib/RT/Interface/Web.pm (this also works for something
that isn't a "select one value"):
@@ -1217,6 +1217,8 @@
my $cf_values = $Object->CustomFieldValues($cf);
my %values_hash;
+ my @addcfresults = ();
+
foreach my $value (@values) {
next unless length($value);
@@ -1229,17 +1231,20 @@
Value => $value
);
push ( @results, $msg );
+ push( @addcfresults, $msg );
}
}
- while ( my $cf_value = $cf_values->Next ) {
- unless ( $values_hash{ $cf_value->Content }
== 1 ) {
- my ( $val, $msg ) =
$Object->DeleteCustomFieldValue(
- Field => $cf,
- Value => $cf_value->Content
- );
- push ( @results, $msg);
+ if (!@addcfresults or
!$CustomFieldObj->MaxValues ) {
+ while ( my $cf_value = $cf_values->Next ) {
+ unless ( $values_hash{
$cf_value->Content } == 1 ) {
+ my ( $val, $msg ) =
$Object->DeleteCustomFieldValue(
+ Field => $cf,
+ Value => $cf_value->Content
+ );
+ push ( @results, $msg);
+ }
}
}
}
Let me know if another diff type would be clearer for you to make the
change to your code.
Eric Schultz
United Online
-----Original Message-----
From: rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com
[mailto:rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Philip
Kime
Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2006 2:37 PM
To: RT users
Subject: [rt-users] Strange message when changing "Select One Value" CFs
inRT 3.4.5
If I change a "Select one value" CF in RT 3.4.5, I get two messages, for
example:
* ClusterCountryCode FR changed to US
* Custom field value FR could not be found for custom field
ClusterCountryCode
The change is fine and works but the second message is odd (it comes
from CustomField_Overlay.pm) - it looks like it tries to change it twice
and fails the second time because the value is already changed? Any
comments? Is this a bug?
PK
--
Philip Kime
NOPS Systems Architect
310 401 0407
From nazark at auska.com Wed Jun 7 16:20:06 2006
From: nazark at auska.com (Nazar Kulynych)
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 16:20:06 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Scrip doesn't work
In-Reply-To: <200606061853.k56IrM708143@marocconnect.com>
References: <200606061853.k56IrM708143@marocconnect.com>
Message-ID: <448734F6.3070405@auska.com>
I have recently installed RT 3.4.5, when I try to add users I get the
following message in my apache error_log.
[Wed Jun 07 23:17:36 2006] [notice] child pid 18164 exit signal
Segmentation fault (11)
[Wed Jun 7 20:17:36 2006] [crit]: Transaction not committed. Usually
indicates a software fault.Data loss may have occurred
(/www/apps/rt-3.4.5/lib/RT/Interface/Web/Handler.pm:205)
Any idea?
thanks
Nazar
From pkime at Shopzilla.com Wed Jun 7 17:07:36 2006
From: pkime at Shopzilla.com (Philip Kime)
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 14:07:36 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] RE: Strange message when changing "Select One Value" CFs
inRT 3.4.5
Message-ID: <58B1112F0EEB7349AE14A0AA46F9CEC00137ABD3@szexchange.Shopzilla.inc>
There seems to be the same issue in RT 3.6 too ...
Thanks for the patch - I'll try it out.
-----Original Message-----
From: Schultz, Eric [mailto:ESchultz at corp.untd.com]
Sent: 07 June 2006 12:38
To: Philip Kime; RT users
Subject: RE: [rt-users] Strange message when changing "Select One Value"
CFs inRT 3.4.5
Since I've made a number of other changes, I can't just give you a
patch. But yes, I thought it was a bug, and I fixed it thusly in
/path/to/your/rt/lib/RT/Interface/Web.pm (this also works for something
that isn't a "select one value"):
@@ -1217,6 +1217,8 @@
my $cf_values = $Object->CustomFieldValues($cf);
my %values_hash;
+ my @addcfresults = ();
+
foreach my $value (@values) {
next unless length($value);
@@ -1229,17 +1231,20 @@
Value => $value
);
push ( @results, $msg );
+ push( @addcfresults, $msg );
}
}
- while ( my $cf_value = $cf_values->Next ) {
- unless ( $values_hash{ $cf_value->Content }
== 1 ) {
- my ( $val, $msg ) =
$Object->DeleteCustomFieldValue(
- Field => $cf,
- Value => $cf_value->Content
- );
- push ( @results, $msg);
+ if (!@addcfresults or
!$CustomFieldObj->MaxValues ) {
+ while ( my $cf_value = $cf_values->Next ) {
+ unless ( $values_hash{
$cf_value->Content } == 1 ) {
+ my ( $val, $msg ) =
$Object->DeleteCustomFieldValue(
+ Field => $cf,
+ Value => $cf_value->Content
+ );
+ push ( @results, $msg);
+ }
}
}
}
Let me know if another diff type would be clearer for you to make the
change to your code.
Eric Schultz
United Online
-----Original Message-----
From: rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com
[mailto:rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Philip
Kime
Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2006 2:37 PM
To: RT users
Subject: [rt-users] Strange message when changing "Select One Value" CFs
inRT 3.4.5
If I change a "Select one value" CF in RT 3.4.5, I get two messages, for
example:
* ClusterCountryCode FR changed to US
* Custom field value FR could not be found for custom field
ClusterCountryCode
The change is fine and works but the second message is odd (it comes
from CustomField_Overlay.pm) - it looks like it tries to change it twice
and fails the second time because the value is already changed? Any
comments? Is this a bug?
PK
--
Philip Kime
NOPS Systems Architect
310 401 0407
From nazark at auska.com Wed Jun 7 17:12:32 2006
From: nazark at auska.com (Nazar Kulynych)
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 17:12:32 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Segmentation Fault
In-Reply-To: <448734F6.3070405@auska.com>
References: <200606061853.k56IrM708143@marocconnect.com>
<448734F6.3070405@auska.com>
Message-ID: <44874140.1070506@auska.com>
I have recently installed RT 3.4.5, when I try to add users I get the
following message in my apache error_log.
[Wed Jun 07 23:17:36 2006] [notice] child pid 18164 exit signal
Segmentation fault (11)
[Wed Jun 7 20:17:36 2006] [crit]: Transaction not committed. Usually
indicates a software fault.Data loss may have occurred
(/www/apps/rt-3.4.5/lib/RT/Interface/Web/Handler.pm:205)
Any idea?
thanks
Nazar
From pkime at Shopzilla.com Wed Jun 7 20:14:20 2006
From: pkime at Shopzilla.com (Philip Kime)
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 17:14:20 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] Re: Known bug in RT 3.4.5 with disabled Group display?
Message-ID: <58B1112F0EEB7349AE14A0AA46F9CEC00137ABDB@szexchange.Shopzilla.inc>
Seems to still be a problem in 3.6rc3 ...
>I believe we've already fixed this for 3.4.6, but checking that would
be appreciated?
On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 08:09:56PM -0700, Philip Kime wrote:
> Is it a known bug in 3.4.5 that the "Include disabled groups in
listing"
> box on the Groups display page does nothing? I added this to the INIT
> sectionof /Admin/Groups/index.html and now it seems to work ...
>
> if ($FindDisabledGroups) {
> $Groups->{'find_disabled_rows'} = 1; }
>
From dsmithson at activsupport.com Wed Jun 7 20:18:25 2006
From: dsmithson at activsupport.com (David Smithson)
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 17:18:25 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] detail reports
Message-ID:
Hi all. Is there any built-in function for displaying and printing
detailed reports in RT? I only ask because I don't find such a function
and I want to be sure before I start exploring other reporting options.
David Smithson
--------------------------------------
ActivSupport, Inc. - Your Flexible IT Partner
Microsoft Gold Partner
http://www.activsupport.com
Director of Technical Services
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From dsmithson at activsupport.com Wed Jun 7 20:46:17 2006
From: dsmithson at activsupport.com (David Smithson)
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 17:46:17 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] detail reports
Message-ID:
Perhaps I should explain myself better. You can get a summary report for several tickets easily, using the query functions. I have a need to get detailed reports for several tickets resulting from a query. We are looking at replacing our custom ticketing system with RT. Currently we offer full visibility to our clients by delivering them ticket logs with invoices. I'm looking to get the same functionality in RT.
________________________________________
From: rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com [mailto:rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of David Smithson
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 5:18 PM
To: rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: [rt-users] detail reports
Hi all.? Is there any built-in function for displaying and printing detailed reports in RT?? I only ask because I don't find such a function and I want to be sure before I start exploring other reporting options.
David Smithson
--------------------------------------
ActivSupport, Inc. - Your Flexible IT Partner
Microsoft Gold Partner
http://www.activsupport.com
Director of Technical Services
?
?
?
From pkime at Shopzilla.com Wed Jun 7 20:53:30 2006
From: pkime at Shopzilla.com (Philip Kime)
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 17:53:30 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] RE: Strange message when changing "Select One Value" CFs
inRT 3.4.5
Message-ID: <58B1112F0EEB7349AE14A0AA46F9CEC00137ABDE@szexchange.Shopzilla.inc>
Hmm, I tried this but get the same message. However, I'm only seeing
this behaviour with Custom Fields in Assets, not Tickets it seems ...
PK
-----Original Message-----
From: Schultz, Eric [mailto:ESchultz at corp.untd.com]
Sent: 07 June 2006 12:38
To: Philip Kime; RT users
Subject: RE: [rt-users] Strange message when changing "Select One Value"
CFs inRT 3.4.5
Since I've made a number of other changes, I can't just give you a
patch. But yes, I thought it was a bug, and I fixed it thusly in
/path/to/your/rt/lib/RT/Interface/Web.pm (this also works for something
that isn't a "select one value"):
@@ -1217,6 +1217,8 @@
my $cf_values = $Object->CustomFieldValues($cf);
my %values_hash;
+ my @addcfresults = ();
+
foreach my $value (@values) {
next unless length($value);
@@ -1229,17 +1231,20 @@
Value => $value
);
push ( @results, $msg );
+ push( @addcfresults, $msg );
}
}
- while ( my $cf_value = $cf_values->Next ) {
- unless ( $values_hash{ $cf_value->Content }
== 1 ) {
- my ( $val, $msg ) =
$Object->DeleteCustomFieldValue(
- Field => $cf,
- Value => $cf_value->Content
- );
- push ( @results, $msg);
+ if (!@addcfresults or
!$CustomFieldObj->MaxValues ) {
+ while ( my $cf_value = $cf_values->Next ) {
+ unless ( $values_hash{
$cf_value->Content } == 1 ) {
+ my ( $val, $msg ) =
$Object->DeleteCustomFieldValue(
+ Field => $cf,
+ Value => $cf_value->Content
+ );
+ push ( @results, $msg);
+ }
}
}
}
Let me know if another diff type would be clearer for you to make the
change to your code.
Eric Schultz
United Online
-----Original Message-----
From: rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com
[mailto:rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Philip
Kime
Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2006 2:37 PM
To: RT users
Subject: [rt-users] Strange message when changing "Select One Value" CFs
inRT 3.4.5
If I change a "Select one value" CF in RT 3.4.5, I get two messages, for
example:
* ClusterCountryCode FR changed to US
* Custom field value FR could not be found for custom field
ClusterCountryCode
The change is fine and works but the second message is odd (it comes
from CustomField_Overlay.pm) - it looks like it tries to change it twice
and fails the second time because the value is already changed? Any
comments? Is this a bug?
PK
--
Philip Kime
NOPS Systems Architect
310 401 0407
From ESchultz at corp.untd.com Wed Jun 7 21:13:53 2006
From: ESchultz at corp.untd.com (Schultz, Eric)
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 18:13:53 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] RE: Strange message when changing "Select One Value" CFs
inRT 3.4.5
Message-ID: <5613F89D78D2F545A40423EBA5535C300FDEFF2E@LAXEVS01.lax.corp.int.untd.com>
I don't know what to tell you about the asset tracker code. Maybe you
can use the RT code as a hint for how to fix the AT code.
Eric Schultz
United Online
-----Original Message-----
From: Philip Kime [mailto:pkime at Shopzilla.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 5:54 PM
To: Schultz, Eric; RT users
Subject: RE: Strange message when changing "Select One Value" CFs inRT
3.4.5
Hmm, I tried this but get the same message. However, I'm only seeing
this behaviour with Custom Fields in Assets, not Tickets it seems ...
PK
-----Original Message-----
From: Schultz, Eric [mailto:ESchultz at corp.untd.com]
Sent: 07 June 2006 12:38
To: Philip Kime; RT users
Subject: RE: [rt-users] Strange message when changing "Select One Value"
CFs inRT 3.4.5
Since I've made a number of other changes, I can't just give you a
patch. But yes, I thought it was a bug, and I fixed it thusly in
/path/to/your/rt/lib/RT/Interface/Web.pm (this also works for something
that isn't a "select one value"):
@@ -1217,6 +1217,8 @@
my $cf_values = $Object->CustomFieldValues($cf);
my %values_hash;
+ my @addcfresults = ();
+
foreach my $value (@values) {
next unless length($value);
@@ -1229,17 +1231,20 @@
Value => $value
);
push ( @results, $msg );
+ push( @addcfresults, $msg );
}
}
- while ( my $cf_value = $cf_values->Next ) {
- unless ( $values_hash{ $cf_value->Content }
== 1 ) {
- my ( $val, $msg ) =
$Object->DeleteCustomFieldValue(
- Field => $cf,
- Value => $cf_value->Content
- );
- push ( @results, $msg);
+ if (!@addcfresults or
!$CustomFieldObj->MaxValues ) {
+ while ( my $cf_value = $cf_values->Next ) {
+ unless ( $values_hash{
$cf_value->Content } == 1 ) {
+ my ( $val, $msg ) =
$Object->DeleteCustomFieldValue(
+ Field => $cf,
+ Value => $cf_value->Content
+ );
+ push ( @results, $msg);
+ }
}
}
}
Let me know if another diff type would be clearer for you to make the
change to your code.
Eric Schultz
United Online
-----Original Message-----
From: rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com
[mailto:rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Philip
Kime
Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2006 2:37 PM
To: RT users
Subject: [rt-users] Strange message when changing "Select One Value" CFs
inRT 3.4.5
If I change a "Select one value" CF in RT 3.4.5, I get two messages, for
example:
* ClusterCountryCode FR changed to US
* Custom field value FR could not be found for custom field
ClusterCountryCode
The change is fine and works but the second message is odd (it comes
from CustomField_Overlay.pm) - it looks like it tries to change it twice
and fails the second time because the value is already changed? Any
comments? Is this a bug?
PK
--
Philip Kime
NOPS Systems Architect
310 401 0407
From dsmithson at activsupport.com Wed Jun 7 23:05:04 2006
From: dsmithson at activsupport.com (David Smithson)
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 20:05:04 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] detail reports
Message-ID:
And you might be wondering what exactly I mean by "detail". In this case, I mean that a detail report would include data from tables Attachments and possibly transactions. It would sort of be what you see in the Jumbo display.
On a side note: It would be neat if RT could hide parts of email correspondence that are inline inclusions from previous emails, sort of the way Gmail does it.
-----Original Message-----
From: David Smithson
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 5:46 PM
To: David Smithson; rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: RE: [rt-users] detail reports
Perhaps I should explain myself better. You can get a summary report for several tickets easily, using the query functions. I have a need to get detailed reports for several tickets resulting from a query. We are looking at replacing our custom ticketing system with RT. Currently we offer full visibility to our clients by delivering them ticket logs with invoices. I'm looking to get the same functionality in RT.
________________________________________
From: rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com [mailto:rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of David Smithson
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 5:18 PM
To: rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: [rt-users] detail reports
Hi all.? Is there any built-in function for displaying and printing detailed reports in RT?? I only ask because I don't find such a function and I want to be sure before I start exploring other reporting options.
David Smithson
--------------------------------------
ActivSupport, Inc. - Your Flexible IT Partner
Microsoft Gold Partner
http://www.activsupport.com
Director of Technical Services
?
?
?
From pkime at Shopzilla.com Thu Jun 8 01:05:00 2006
From: pkime at Shopzilla.com (Philip Kime)
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 22:05:00 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] RE: Strange message when changing "Select One Value" CFs
inRT 3.4.5
Message-ID: <58B1112F0EEB7349AE14A0AA46F9CEC00137ABE1@szexchange.Shopzilla.inc>
Fixed - thanks - the code was in
$rtroot/lib/RTx/AssetTracker/Interface/Web.pm and exactly the same fix
fixed it ...
PK
-----Original Message-----
From: Schultz, Eric [mailto:ESchultz at corp.untd.com]
Sent: 07 June 2006 18:14
To: Philip Kime; RT users
Subject: RE: Strange message when changing "Select One Value" CFs inRT
3.4.5
I don't know what to tell you about the asset tracker code. Maybe you
can use the RT code as a hint for how to fix the AT code.
Eric Schultz
United Online
From andreas.sinn at cpb-software.ag Thu Jun 8 02:05:31 2006
From: andreas.sinn at cpb-software.ag (Andreas Sinn)
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 08:05:31 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] Change the content of all subjects
Message-ID: <07FD4DCB6B2E194495066CA0A5CF11770C6931@MXS1.cpbs.at>
I want to know if it is possible to change the content of all subjects,
now it is "[ #ticket number] Ticket name" and I want the following
result:
"Ticket name [Ticket Number]".
Please help me
Thanks,
Andreas
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From thomas.plantNOSPAM at lvh.it Thu Jun 8 02:32:16 2006
From: thomas.plantNOSPAM at lvh.it (Thomas Plant)
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 08:32:16 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] Upgrade problem Ubuntu 6.06
Message-ID:
Hello,
I've upgraded my Ubuntu Server vom Breezy to Dapper now when I want to
respond to a ticket or resolve it, I get the following error:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
error: Can't call method "Scrips" on an undefined value at
/usr/share/request-tracker3.4/html/Ticket/Elements/PreviewScrips line 95.
context:
...
91: my @non_recipients = $TicketObj->SquelchMailTo;
92: %init>
93: <&|/l&>This message will be sent to...&>
94: <&|/l&>(Check boxes to disable notifications to the listed
recipients)&>
95: % foreach my $scrip (@{$Object->Scrips->Prepared}) {
96: % next unless $scrip->ActionObj->Action->isa('RT::Action::SendEmail');
97: <%$scrip->Description%>
98: <&|/l, loc($scrip->ConditionObj->Name),
loc($scrip->ActionObj->Name), loc($scrip->TemplateObj->Name)&>[_1] [_2]
with template [_3]&>
99:
...
code stack:
/usr/share/request-tracker3.4/html/Ticket/Elements/PreviewScrips:95
/usr/share/request-tracker3.4/html/Ticket/Update.html:135
/usr/share/request-tracker3.4/html/autohandler:215
raw error
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
And in the Apache 2 Logs I see the following:
[Wed Jun 07 15:55:25 2006] [error] [client 192.168.1.33] FastCGI: server
"/usr/share/request-tracker3.4/libexec/mason_handler.fcgi" stderr: [Wed
Jun 7 13:55:25 2006] [err]: RT::Ticket=HASH(0x2ef62f0) couldn't init a
transaction Transaction Created
(/usr/share/request-tracker3.4/lib/RT/Ticket_Overlay.pm:2413), referer:
http://help.lvh.dnet.it/Ticket/Display.html?id=197
Can anybody help?
Ubuntu is version 6.06 x86_64 and RT is 3.4.4
Thanks,
Thomas
From scoutts at bcs.org.uk Thu Jun 8 03:38:57 2006
From: scoutts at bcs.org.uk (Steven Coutts)
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 08:38:57 +0100
Subject: [rt-users] Trouble logging in
In-Reply-To: <200606061448.49705.scoutts@bcs.org.uk>
References: <200606061448.49705.scoutts@bcs.org.uk>
Message-ID: <200606080838.57609.scoutts@bcs.org.uk>
Strange, just tried it again today and it let me log in, I then clicked on
a ticket and it started doing the internal server error again!
Now I can't even get the login page to appear anymore.
Same thing in the logs -:
Out of memory!
[Wed Jun 07 14:00:29 2006] [error] [client 10.130.36.42] FastCGI:
incomplete headers (0 bytes) received from server
"/var/www/localhost/rt-3.4.5/bin/mason_handler.fcgi"
[Wed Jun 07 14:00:29 2006] [warn] FastCGI: server
"/var/www/localhost/rt-3.4.5/bin/mason_handler.fcgi" (pid 19050)
terminated by calling exit with status '1'
[Wed Jun 07 14:00:29 2006] [warn] FastCGI: server
"/var/www/localhost/rt-3.4.5/bin/mason_handler.fcgi" (uid 10001, gid 443)
restarted (pid 22329)
Anyone got any ideas about this please?
On Tuesday 06 June 2006 14:48, Steven Coutts wrote:
> I can't login to my RT system anymore.
>
> This is what is in the apache 2 error_log -:
>
> -- [Tue Jun 06 14:46:52 2006] [notice] Apache configured -- resuming normal
> operations
> [Tue Jun 06 14:46:53 2006] [warn] FastCGI:
> server "/var/www/localhost/rt-3.4.5/bin/mason_handler.fcgi" (uid 10001, gid
> 443) started (pid 12330)
> [Tue Jun 06 14:46:54 2006] [warn] FastCGI:
> server "/var/www/localhost/rt-3.4.5/bin/mason_handler.fcgi" (uid 10001, gid
> 443) started (pid 13109)
> [Tue Jun 06 14:46:55 2006] [warn] FastCGI:
> server "/var/www/localhost/rt-3.4.5/bin/mason_handler.fcgi" (uid 10001, gid
> 443) started (pid 17435)
> Out of memory!
> [Tue Jun 06 14:47:08 2006] [error] [client 10.130.36.42] FastCGI:
> incomplete headers (0 bytes) received from
> server "/var/www/localhost/rt-3.4.5/bin/mason_handler.fcgi"
> [Tue Jun 06 14:47:08 2006] [warn] FastCGI:
> server "/var/www/localhost/rt-3.4.5/bin/mason_handler.fcgi" (pid 797)
> terminated by calling exit with status '1'
> [Tue Jun 06 14:47:08 2006] [warn] FastCGI:
> server "/var/www/localhost/rt-3.4.5/bin/mason_handler.fcgi" (uid 10001, gid
> 443) restarted (pid 9081)
>
> I am at a loss at to what is wrong here!
>
> Any ideas ?
>
> Regards
>
> --
> Steven Coutts B.Sc.(Hons) MBCS
> scoutts at bcs.org.uk
>
> PGP Public Key
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
>
>
> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>
>
> We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical:
> http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
--
Steven Coutts B.Sc.(Hons) MBCS
scoutts at bcs.org.uk
PGP Public Key
From thomas.plantNOSPAM at lvh.it Thu Jun 8 05:21:55 2006
From: thomas.plantNOSPAM at lvh.it (Thomas Plant)
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 11:21:55 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] Re: Upgrade problem Ubuntu 6.06
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID:
Found the problem!
I upgraded Postgresql-7.4 to 8.1. Downgraded again to 7.4 all works fine!
From je_mi_re at yahoo.com Thu Jun 8 06:31:24 2006
From: je_mi_re at yahoo.com (guppy rules)
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 03:31:24 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [rt-users] help with install
Message-ID: <20060608103124.29426.qmail@web38412.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Hi,
I have installed rt-3.4 on a Fedora Core 4 system.
I get te login page. I can login, but when I click on them menu (for example tickets), I get the following page:
%# BEGIN BPS TAGGED BLOCK {{{ %# %# COPYRIGHT: %# %# This software is Copyright (c) 1996-2005 Best Practical Solutions, LLC %# %# %# (Except where explicitly superseded by other copyright notices) %# %# %# LICENSE: %# %# This work is made available to you under the terms of Version 2 of %# the GNU General Public License. A copy of that license should have %# been provided with this software, but in any event can be snarfed %# from www.gnu.org. %# %# This work is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but %# WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of %
and so on. What is going wrog?
My rt.conf in /etc/httpd/conf.d:
:80>
ServerName
DocumentRoot /var/rt/html
AddDefaultCharset UTF-8
PerlModule Apache::DBI
PerlRequire /usr/bin/webmux.pl
Alias /rt /var/rt/html
Options None
SetHandler perl-script
PerlHandler RT::Mason
PerlFixupHandler Apache::SmallProf
SetHandler default-handler
Thanks for the help.
Regards,
Jemi
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From thiago.cristino at gmail.com Thu Jun 8 09:22:14 2006
From: thiago.cristino at gmail.com (Thiago Cristino dos Santos)
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 10:22:14 -0300
Subject: [rt-users] Load Custom Fields in Offline edits
Message-ID:
Hi,
i'm using RT 3.4.4, there's any way to create a ticket with CustomFields in
Tools->Offline ?
I,m referencing my custom fields in template, but only the default fields
are loaded.
TIA
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From jesse at bestpractical.com Thu Jun 8 09:49:02 2006
From: jesse at bestpractical.com (Jesse Vincent)
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 09:49:02 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Load Custom Fields in Offline edits
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID: <20060608134902.GC8022@bestpractical.com>
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 10:22:14AM -0300, Thiago Cristino dos Santos wrote:
> Hi,
> i'm using RT 3.4.4, there's any way to create a ticket with CustomFields in
> Tools->Offline ?
> I,m referencing my custom fields in template, but only the default fields
> are loaded.
Nope, but htat should work just great in 3.6
From matthew.hunt at yhfsc.org.uk Thu Jun 8 10:47:50 2006
From: matthew.hunt at yhfsc.org.uk (Matt Hunt)
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 15:47:50 +0100
Subject: [rt-users] Ststus Field Modification
Message-ID: <1149778070.9443.7.camel@fsc02.ng.local>
Hello all; I'm a bit of a beginner where Request Tracker is concerned,
another user set up the main package, all I have done is set up the
infrastructure of the program such as user's rights and so on. What I
would like to know is about the status field, I would like to modify
these and add some of my own, I have searched the wiki and cannot find
anything, it may just be me dumb but all help would be appreciated.
From dtikhonov at vonage.com Thu Jun 8 11:00:38 2006
From: dtikhonov at vonage.com (Dmitri Tikhonov)
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 11:00:38 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Ststus Field Modification
In-Reply-To: <1149778070.9443.7.camel@fsc02.ng.local>
References: <1149778070.9443.7.camel@fsc02.ng.local>
Message-ID: <1149778838.27105.61.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 10:47 -0400, Matt Hunt wrote:
> Hello all; I'm a bit of a beginner where Request Tracker is concerned,
> another user set up the main package, all I have done is set up the
> infrastructure of the program such as user's rights and so on. What I
> would like to know is about the status field, I would like to modify
> these and add some of my own, I have searched the wiki and cannot find
> anything, it may just be me dumb but all help would be appreciated.
>
Open /etc/rt3/RT_Config.pm, and look for @ActiveStatus and
@InactiveStatus arrays. Heed the warning (found in the same file),
however:
# WARNING. DO NOT DELETE ANY OF THE DEFAULT STATUSES. If you do, RT
# will break horribly.
- Dmitri.
From rickr at rice.edu Thu Jun 8 11:15:42 2006
From: rickr at rice.edu (Rick Russell)
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 10:15:42 -0500
Subject: [rt-users] detail reports
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID: <44883F1E.5070902@rice.edu>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
The
rt list
and
rt show
command-line functions can probably give you want you need. Type "rt
help" at your server command line for more.
Rick R.
David Smithson wrote:
> Perhaps I should explain myself better. You can get a summary report for several tickets easily, using the query functions. I have a need to get detailed reports for several tickets resulting from a query. We are looking at replacing our custom ticketing system with RT. Currently we offer full visibility to our clients by delivering them ticket logs with invoices. I'm looking to get the same functionality in RT.
>
> ________________________________________
> From: rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com [mailto:rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of David Smithson
> Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 5:18 PM
> To: rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
> Subject: [rt-users] detail reports
>
> Hi all. Is there any built-in function for displaying and printing detailed reports in RT? I only ask because I don't find such a function and I want to be sure before I start exploring other reporting options.
>
> David Smithson
> --------------------------------------
> ActivSupport, Inc. - Your Flexible IT Partner
> Microsoft Gold Partner
> http://www.activsupport.com
> Director of Technical Services
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
>
>
> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>
>
> We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical: http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEiD8eXIxWysfLtmkRAieXAJ9pDhE6mVoRcDRRTse1FXYnSeqsjACeI24i
fHQvi7Bzon8ecSpt1u+LIwI=
=dfVZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From dlamers at elcan.com Thu Jun 8 11:23:12 2006
From: dlamers at elcan.com (Lamers, Dan)
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 11:23:12 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Ststus Field Modification
Message-ID: <0FB8C170485E29419C3ADAC3A13886CA033F544D@EMEXCH004002>
I'm a nooby too, but I just finished looking through the
/etc/request-tracker3.4/RT_Config.pm and saw comments about how to make your
own changes to the status list. Look for the ActiveStatus and
InactiveStatus lines from the config file and copy them to the
RT_SiteConfig.pm. I believe that you need to restart your web service after
making changes to the config file.
Hope this works for you!
Regards,
Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com
[mailto:rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com]On Behalf Of Matt Hunt
Sent: June 8, 2006 10:48 AM
To: rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: [rt-users] Ststus Field Modification
Hello all; I'm a bit of a beginner where Request Tracker is concerned,
another user set up the main package, all I have done is set up the
infrastructure of the program such as user's rights and so on. What I
would like to know is about the status field, I would like to modify
these and add some of my own, I have searched the wiki and cannot find
anything, it may just be me dumb but all help would be appreciated.
_______________________________________________
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical:
http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
DISCLAIMER: The information in this message is confidential and may be
legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
message by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended
recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution of the message, or any
action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be
unlawful. Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this
message in error. Thank you.
From uli.staerk at globalways.net Thu Jun 8 11:55:23 2006
From: uli.staerk at globalways.net (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Uli_St=E4rk?=)
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 17:55:23 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] No confirmation mail on closing a ticket
Message-ID:
I have following problem. I've received an email from another RT. If I mark the request on my side as completed, my RT sends the other RT an email that the ticked is now closed. So if the other RT receives this e-mail, it automatically sends back an email as a receive-confirmation and re-opens their ticket. So we have a nice never ending round-robin system.
Solution = ?
From fpater at dca.net Thu Jun 8 12:07:36 2006
From: fpater at dca.net (Frank Pater)
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 12:07:36 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] No confirmation mail on closing a ticket
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID: <20060608160736.GE7717@staff.dca.net>
Hi Uli,
You have a couple options, depending on your requirements:
1) Reject the ticket when you see that another RT instance is talking back. Rejecting doesn't send mail.
2) Remove the requestor e-mail address, resolve the ticket, and put the requestor address back in the ticket. This is more work, but allows you to keep the requestor address and get the ticket into the resolved state.
These are the options we use, anyway. I'm sure there are others...
Sincerely,
Frank Pater
DCANet
http://www.dca.net
voice: 888-4-DCANET (888-432-2638)
fax: 302-426-6386
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 05:55:23PM +0200, Uli St?rk wrote:
> I have following problem. I've received an email from another RT. If I mark the request on my side as completed, my RT sends the other RT an email that the ticked is now closed. So if the other RT receives this e-mail, it automatically sends back an email as a receive-confirmation and re-opens their ticket. So we have a nice never ending round-robin system.
>
> Solution = ?
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
>
>
> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>
>
> We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical: http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
From KFCrocker at lbl.gov Thu Jun 8 12:11:43 2006
From: KFCrocker at lbl.gov (Kenneth Crocker)
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 09:11:43 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] Custom Field issue
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20060607095013.01d03af0@ukmail1.uky.edu>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20060607095013.01d03af0@ukmail1.uky.edu>
Message-ID: <44884C3F.608@lbl.gov>
John A. Walker wrote:
> OK ... We are running RT 3.4.5 and I'm having trouble trying to
> achieve something that we want to do. I think I'm close but I just
> need a little help to get over the edge.
>
> Basically, for specific queues, we have a custom field that contains a
> list of users. The list of users is a list of people that can approve
> tickets. When a user is selected an approval ticket is generated for
> the specified user. If no one is selected (no value) then it creates
> the ticket normally. This part works fine.
>
> We realized that if someone might create the ticket initially not
> thinking that it needs to be approved and then discover that it
> approval is required. We wanted to make it so a user could go back
> and select an approver and generate the approval request as it would
> if it were done at the original creation of the ticket.
>
> What I was thinking I could do is compare the old value of the custom
> field with the current value of the custom field and if they had
> changed I could return 1 and run the approval template. If this can
> be done, I would also want to check to see if the new value was "no
> value" and if it were then I would return 0.
>
> I have searched the archives and can come up with stuff that is close
> but nothing that actually does a check on the old value of a custom
> field within the scrip. Part of the problem is that I'm not entirely
> sure what the proper syntax of referring to the fields and their
> values. So if there is some place that can give me a break down of
> how to do this that would be great.
>
>
> Here is the contents of the User Defined Condition as it works on the
> creation of a ticket:
>
> if (($self->TransactionObj->Type eq "Create") and
> ($self->TicketObj->FirstCustomFieldValue('Approval required by:') =~
> /\w/)) {
> return 1;
> }
> return 0;
>
>
> Here is the contents of the template that is called by the above scrip:
>
> ===Create-Ticket: manager-approval
> Subject: Approval of { $Tickets{'TOP'}->Subject() }
> Queue: ___Approvals
> Type: approval
> Owner: { $Tickets{'TOP'}->FirstCustomFieldValue('Approval
> required by:') }
> Depended-On-By: { $Tickets{'TOP'}->Id() }
> RefersTo: { $Tickets{'TOP'}->Id() }
> Content: Please review and approve this request.
> ENDOFCONTENT
>
>
>
> I was attempting to add further checks in the scrip that basically
> look to see if the transaction type is not equal to "Create" . If
> that was the case then I would look at the custom field value
> ('Approval required by:') and see if it had changed.
>
> I sure hope someone has something I can run with. I don't even have
> to have the complete answer. Just point me in the right direction.
> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks
> John
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
>
>
> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>
>
> We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical:
> http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
>
John,
You seem to have gone to a lot of work to get some form of approvals
going with certain people being allowed to do that, but it looks to me
like you went the long way around the barn. Without ANY PERL scrips or
anything, I have a Queue set aside for approvals, it receives requests
by any group (of users) allowed or the group that "supports"
(Approvals-Support) with the right privileges can create, own, whatever
the needs are to/for a request. Then when approved, they (the approvers)
merely change the owner to "nobody" and change the Queue to where the
requests belongs. Everything is in history under the same ticket number
(great for auditors). By creating all this code, you may have created a
house of cards that will be difficult to maintain, whereas by using RT
as-is, we have much less maintenance to perform. Think about it. I
really have no advice to give about all the extra code.
Kenn
From KFCrocker at lbl.gov Thu Jun 8 12:20:11 2006
From: KFCrocker at lbl.gov (Kenneth Crocker)
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 09:20:11 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] RT 3.6.0rc2 not attempting email to requestors upon
reply
In-Reply-To: <8FBAE125-3680-49EB-A659-FA5422C41A7E@indiana.edu>
References:
<8FBAE125-3680-49EB-A659-FA5422C41A7E@indiana.edu>
Message-ID: <44884E3B.9090606@lbl.gov>
Joe Auty wrote:
> If I were to wager a guess, it looks like the problem involves the scrip:
>
> On Correspond Notify Requestors and Ccs with template Correspondence
>
>
> Is there some sort of way of verifying that this Scrip is working?
>
>
>
> On Jun 7, 2006, at 2:09 PM, Joe Auty wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> When I go to reply to a ticket, RT does not even attempt to send
>> email out to the requestor's email address within version 3.6 - there
>> is no record at all in my mail log. Is this the intended behavior, or
>> a simple misconfiguration? If the latter, what needs to be corrected?
>> I can't seem to locate anything on the WIki...
>>
>>
>>
>> -----------
>> Joe Auty
>> UITS Messaging
>> Indiana University
>> jauty at indiana.edu
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>>
>> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
>> Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
>>
>>
>> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
>> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>>
>>
>> We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical:
>> http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
>
> -----------
> Joe Auty
> UITS Messaging
> Indiana University
> jauty at indiana.edu
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
>
>
> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>
>
> We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical: http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
Joe,
We use that particular global scrip all the time. no problems. What
privileges do you have set for the role Requestors? We use
SeeOutgoingEmail for everyone at the global level and at the Queue level
ReplyToTicket for certain groups using certain Queues (depending on
purpose of Queue). I'd look at your privileges and scrips. Watcher can
get E_mail to if you give them the privilege as well.
Kenn
From jawalk00 at uky.edu Thu Jun 8 13:04:09 2006
From: jawalk00 at uky.edu (John A. Walker)
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 13:04:09 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Custom Field issue
In-Reply-To: <44884C3F.608@lbl.gov>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20060607095013.01d03af0@ukmail1.uky.edu>
<5.1.0.14.2.20060607095013.01d03af0@ukmail1.uky.edu>
Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20060608123850.01d03580@ukmail1.uky.edu>
Kenn - Thanks for taking the time to respond. It is greatly
appreciated. Let me explain a little more and then you can let me know if
what you're doing would still apply. In essence we were wanting the user,
as they create the ticket, to be able to select the person that needed to
approve the ticket. We did this by creating a custom field with the list
of users that can approve a ticket. Once a user creating the ticket
selected a person to approve, the ticket create process would also create
the approval request for the person selected as the approver.
I can't tell for sure but I'm thinking that you have a certain group of
users that are allowed to look in the approval queue and users simply
submit approvals into this queue? If I've misunderstood how your situation
works let me know. Perhaps what you are doing would work for our
situation. The key to our situation is the need to have a ticket creator
be able to select the user they want to approve a ticket. If that can be
done with your method and you have the time please give me a little more
detail.
Thanks again.
John
>John,
>
> You seem to have gone to a lot of work to get some form of approvals
> going with certain people being allowed to do that, but it looks to me
> like you went the long way around the barn. Without ANY PERL scrips or
> anything, I have a Queue set aside for approvals, it receives requests by
> any group (of users) allowed or the group that "supports"
> (Approvals-Support) with the right privileges can create, own, whatever
> the needs are to/for a request. Then when approved, they (the approvers)
> merely change the owner to "nobody" and change the Queue to where the
> requests belongs. Everything is in history under the same ticket number
> (great for auditors). By creating all this code, you may have created a
> house of cards that will be difficult to maintain, whereas by using RT
> as-is, we have much less maintenance to perform. Think about it. I really
> have no advice to give about all the extra code.
>
>Kenn
From barnesaw at ucrwcu.rwc.uc.edu Thu Jun 8 13:06:42 2006
From: barnesaw at ucrwcu.rwc.uc.edu (Drew Barnes)
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 13:06:42 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] No confirmation mail on closing a ticket
In-Reply-To: <20060608160736.GE7717@staff.dca.net>
References:
<20060608160736.GE7717@staff.dca.net>
Message-ID: <44885922.2070203@ucrwcu.rwc.uc.edu>
On the wiki, there is a ResolveOnce scrip under contributions
somewhere. We use that for when someone re-opens a ticket. The email
doesn't go out that second time.
Frank Pater wrote:
> Hi Uli,
>
> You have a couple options, depending on your requirements:
>
> 1) Reject the ticket when you see that another RT instance is talking back. Rejecting doesn't send mail.
>
> 2) Remove the requestor e-mail address, resolve the ticket, and put the requestor address back in the ticket. This is more work, but allows you to keep the requestor address and get the ticket into the resolved state.
>
> These are the options we use, anyway. I'm sure there are others...
>
> Sincerely,
> Frank Pater
> DCANet
> http://www.dca.net
> voice: 888-4-DCANET (888-432-2638)
> fax: 302-426-6386
>
> On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 05:55:23PM +0200, Uli St?rk wrote:
>
>> I have following problem. I've received an email from another RT. If I mark the request on my side as completed, my RT sends the other RT an email that the ticked is now closed. So if the other RT receives this e-mail, it automatically sends back an email as a receive-confirmation and re-opens their ticket. So we have a nice never ending round-robin system.
>>
>> Solution = ?
>> _______________________________________________
>> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>>
>> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
>> Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
>>
>>
>> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
>> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>>
>>
>> We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical: http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>>
>> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
>> Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
>>
>>
>> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
>> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>>
>>
>> We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical: http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
--
Drew Barnes
Applications Analyst
Raymond Walters College
University of Cincinnati
From ocraig at stillsecure.com Thu Jun 8 14:43:45 2006
From: ocraig at stillsecure.com (Ole Craig)
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 12:43:45 -0600
Subject: [rt-users] 3.6.0rc3/mysql: reinserting image attachments into
the DB?
In-Reply-To: <32914.192.168.37.73.1149660835.squirrel@mail.voidgate.org>
References: <1149645045.26811.83.camel@hex.latis.com>
<32914.192.168.37.73.1149660835.squirrel@mail.voidgate.org>
Message-ID: <1149792225.8584.99.camel@hex.latis.com>
On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 23:13 -0700, Joshua Colson wrote:
> > My question: I still have all the emails from which those image
> > attachments were culled. Does anyone have a suggestion for how to
> > reinsert the uncorrupted images into the database in place of the
> > useless blobs currently residing there? (I'm no DBA at the best of
> > times, and I've never needed to work with non-textual data in mysql
> > before; I'm feeling a bit lost...)
>
> RT does not store attachments as BLOBs. All binary attachments are
> converted to base64 encoding before insertion into the database.
[...]
Interesting. Before I'd read your message, I tried the
following:
mysql> update Attachments set Content=LOAD_FILE('/tmp/Outlook.jpg') where id=323;
...which seems to have achieved the desired results at least as
far as that particular attachment is concerned. (I.e. it now displays
correctly in the ticket.) I noticed (belatedly) that the type for
Attachments.Content is "longtext" -- does mysql have an autoconversion
feature for binary data that happens to DTRT? Or is RT robust enough to
handle the fact that the DB object is not base64? I don't see any errors
in the RT log pertaining to this...
Thanks for the SQL, by the way -- since I had less than 10
images in the system, I was going to go the BFMI route for finding the
relevant attachment numbers, but your way is much more elegant.
(BFMI == "Brute force, massive ignorance" :-)
--
/Ole Craig
Security Engineer
303-381-3802 (main support hotline)
303-381-3824 (my direct line)
303-381-3801 (fax)
www.stillsecure.com
. . .
From KFCrocker at lbl.gov Thu Jun 8 15:08:39 2006
From: KFCrocker at lbl.gov (Kenneth Crocker)
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 12:08:39 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] Custom Field issue
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20060608123850.01d03580@ukmail1.uky.edu>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20060607095013.01d03af0@ukmail1.uky.edu>
<5.1.0.14.2.20060607095013.01d03af0@ukmail1.uky.edu>
<5.1.0.14.2.20060608123850.01d03580@ukmail1.uky.edu>
Message-ID: <448875B7.9030801@lbl.gov>
John A. Walker wrote:
> Kenn - Thanks for taking the time to respond. It is greatly
> appreciated. Let me explain a little more and then you can let me
> know if what you're doing would still apply. In essence we were
> wanting the user, as they create the ticket, to be able to select the
> person that needed to approve the ticket. We did this by creating a
> custom field with the list of users that can approve a ticket. Once
> a user creating the ticket selected a person to approve, the ticket
> create process would also create the approval request for the person
> selected as the approver.
>
> I can't tell for sure but I'm thinking that you have a certain group
> of users that are allowed to look in the approval queue and users
> simply submit approvals into this queue? If I've misunderstood how
> your situation works let me know. Perhaps what you are doing would
> work for our situation. The key to our situation is the need to have
> a ticket creator be able to select the user they want to approve a
> ticket. If that can be done with your method and you have the time
> please give me a little more detail.
>
> Thanks again.
>
> John
>
>
>
>> John,
>>
>> You seem to have gone to a lot of work to get some form of
>> approvals going with certain people being allowed to do that, but it
>> looks to me like you went the long way around the barn. Without ANY
>> PERL scrips or anything, I have a Queue set aside for approvals, it
>> receives requests by any group (of users) allowed or the group that
>> "supports" (Approvals-Support) with the right privileges can create,
>> own, whatever the needs are to/for a request. Then when approved,
>> they (the approvers) merely change the owner to "nobody" and change
>> the Queue to where the requests belongs. Everything is in history
>> under the same ticket number (great for auditors). By creating all
>> this code, you may have created a house of cards that will be
>> difficult to maintain, whereas by using RT as-is, we have much less
>> maintenance to perform. Think about it. I really have no advice to
>> give about all the extra code.
>>
>> Kenn
>
>
John,
Yes, you are partially correct. We have a queue whose sole purpose
is to filter request for several other support queues. We don't allow
the users (or requestors) to create tickets in the technical support
Queues directly, only to the Approvals Queue. The members of the group
that has been assigned privileges for that Approval Queue (like owners,
create (a sub-ticket) or in some cases, like a training issue or
permissions, they even resolve the ticket and the ticket never goes on
to our technical support Queue) all know what type of tickets to deal
with. The difference from your understanding is we don't let the
requestor select the person who will approve the ticket. We have a group
of approvers (in a group assigned privileges to the Approval Queue) who
already know what they can work on/approve. If a ticket for Accounts
Payables shows up in the Approvals Queue, a member of our
Approvals-Support Group KNOWS he has been assigned to work with AP so he
will see the ticket when he checks the approvals Queue and TAKE the
ticket, based on what he reads in the subject matter or based on the
requestor name. Now he owns it and researches the problem and either
resolves the problem (training issue or whatever) or he realizes that
this request needs technical support. So he then makes a change to the
STATUS field (we put in a change and added some new statuses like "rq
approvd", "rejected" (you're only allowed 10 characters for that
field)), changes the owner to "nobody" (we tried to create a scrip to do
this automatically upon Queue Change and couldn't get it to work
correctly so we have the approver do it manually right now until we can
get the scrip to work properly), then the approver changes the Queue to
the appropriate Technical Support Queue, in this case the "AP" Queue.
Then the "AP-Support" group or AdminCc of the "AP" Queue sees the ticket
in their Queue and either the AdminCc assigns an owner or one of the
technicians that are members of that support group takes the ticket and
it gets worked on. We like this method better than the built in RT
Approvals work-flow because all the history stays with the original
ticket number (and we have been seeing ALOT of e_mails from users having
difficulty in getting the RT-Approval function to work, plus the
RT-Approvals functon sets up a "hidden" approval queue for "each" Queue
and creates a new ticket when approved and we like the flexibility of
being able to set up a visible Approval Queue that can handle the
requests of many support queues - without being hidden). This is also
perfect for our auditors. They actually smile when they see this history
all on one ticket. We also like this design because it uses the basic RT
functionality without a lot of extra scrips being written (and therefore
maintained). I've been in this business (Data Processing, I know - old
term) for over 35 years and if I've learned anything, it's that the less
you complicate something, the easier it is to run, maintain, and debug.
"simpler" is just better, at least for me. Anyway, thats the way we do
it and it's working just fine. Our users love it because they can still
monitor the progress of their request from waiting for approval to being
moved to a technical Queue for work, to resolution, the Technical
support group assigned to the Queue that handles the work for "AP" like
it because they aren't bothered by a bunch of requests that are not
technical and can be handled by a Business Analyst, and our Auditors
love it because all the history is there under 1 ticket number.
Anyway, that's what we have created by design. If this is something
you think will work for you, great. It certainly does for us and as I
said, it's a lot simpler.
Kenn
From uli.staerk at globalways.net Thu Jun 8 16:53:41 2006
From: uli.staerk at globalways.net (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Uli_St=E4rk?=)
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 22:53:41 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] AW: [Rt-devel] Fast delete tab for spam-tickets
Message-ID:
Thanks, the Callbacks work fine. I also had an eye on the other cronjob rt-scripts.
I started with the rt-escalade cronjob. The first time I executed this file, all Tickets had the priority 10! :-( Should this script work?
Is the script still necessary? I've found a similar configuration the queue-config (InitialPriority, FinalPriority), but it didn't work for itself.
-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: bobg at remora.cc.uic.edu [mailto:bobg at remora.cc.uic.edu] Im Auftrag von Bob Goldstein
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 8. Juni 2006 15:37
An: Uli St?rk
Cc: Rt-devel at lists.bestpractical.com
Betreff: Re: [Rt-devel] Fast delete tab for spam-tickets
I've used the Callbacks from University of Kent:
http://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/people/staff/tdb/rt3/
(Scroll to the bottom for a description and download link.)
One of the features is a "delete" tab.
bobg
>Due to massive spam in our rt-system I whish to add a new tab to the Ticket/Di
>splay.html.
>I've already found the file where the tabs are defined: Ticket/Elements/Tabs
>
>There I've added the following code:
>if ( $Ticket->CurrentUserHasRight('ModifyTicket') ) {
> $actions->{'G'} = { title => loc('Spam'),
> path => "Ticket/Update.html?Action=Spam&id=" . $id,
> };
>}
>
>Now I want that if the user clicks on this link, the ticket is instantly marke
>d as deleted so no further emails (like Ticked Resolved) are sent.
>
>One possibility is to create a new ticket status (spam) that is equal to delet
>ed. So if when the link is clicked, the ticket status is updated and the user
>returns to the default-entry page of rt. But I think this is ways too complica
>ted to code. So another (easier) possibility is to redirect the user to the Up
>date.html page and pre-select the deleted-status.
>
>Do you have another idea how to solve the spam problem?
>
>Where can I find the script that handles the Aciton= GET-parameter in the Upda
>te.html (2nd solution)?
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>List info: http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-devel
>
>Best Practical is hiring! Come hack Perl for us: http://bestpractical.com/abou
>t/jobs.html
>
>
From Millard.Matt at principal.com Thu Jun 8 16:48:20 2006
From: Millard.Matt at principal.com (Millard, Matt)
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 15:48:20 -0500
Subject: [rt-users] Adding external links to menus
Message-ID:
I'd like to add some external links to the "Tools" menu for apps we use
to reset passwords, manage user and group id's etc. How do I link
externally? When I modify the local Tools/Elements/Tabs file to point
to the pages I end up with links that are relative.
For example:
http://rt.server.host.com/https://server2.host.com/cgi-bin/reset.cgi
my $tabs = { A => { title => loc('Password Reset'),
path =>
'https://server2.host.com/cgi-bin/reset.cgi',
},
B => { 'title' => loc('Offline'),
path => 'Tools/Offline.html',
},
};
This is with RT 3.4.2
Matt
-----Message Disclaimer-----
This e-mail message is intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.
If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
reply email to Connect at principal.com and delete or destroy all copies of
the original message and attachments thereto. Email sent to or from the
Principal Financial Group or any of its member companies may be retained
as required by law or regulation.
Nothing in this message is intended to constitute an Electronic signature
for purposes of the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA) or the
Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act ("E-Sign")
unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in this message.
From jcolson at voidgate.org Thu Jun 8 17:08:21 2006
From: jcolson at voidgate.org (Joshua Colson)
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 14:08:21 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] 3.6.0rc3/mysql: reinserting image attachments into
the DB?
In-Reply-To: <1149792225.8584.99.camel@hex.latis.com>
References: <1149645045.26811.83.camel@hex.latis.com>
<32914.192.168.37.73.1149660835.squirrel@mail.voidgate.org>
<1149792225.8584.99.camel@hex.latis.com>
Message-ID: <1149800901.6583.64.camel@s60r.ination.com>
On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 12:43 -0600, Ole Craig wrote:
> Interesting. Before I'd read your message, I tried the
> following:
>
> mysql> update Attachments set Content=LOAD_FILE('/tmp/Outlook.jpg') where id=323;
>
> ...which seems to have achieved the desired results at least as
> far as that particular attachment is concerned. (I.e. it now displays
> correctly in the ticket.) I noticed (belatedly) that the type for
> Attachments.Content is "longtext" -- does mysql have an autoconversion
> feature for binary data that happens to DTRT? Or is RT robust enough to
> handle the fact that the DB object is not base64? I don't see any errors
> in the RT log pertaining to this...
That surprises me. I'm certainly not a MySQL expert, but I find it
incredibly surprising that loading binary data into a text field works
on-the-fly. However, if MySQL does to on-the-fly conversion, it would
make sense that it chooses base64.
As far as I know, RT relies on the data in the DB being valid (that is,
it does not attempt to auto-convert it).
I'm glad you got it fixed, no matter what worked for you.
--
Joshua Colson
From tomw at bnl.gov Thu Jun 8 17:43:44 2006
From: tomw at bnl.gov (Tomasz Wlodek)
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 17:43:44 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [rt-users] read-only user rights.
In-Reply-To: <44885922.2070203@ucrwcu.rwc.uc.edu>
References:
<20060608160736.GE7717@staff.dca.net>
<44885922.2070203@ucrwcu.rwc.uc.edu>
Message-ID:
Hi,
Imagine that I have a group, non_experts, where I keep people who can
logon to RT web site, can post tickets, can see certain queues (but not
all) and can search tickets in those queues (but not all). Those users
should be able to change their password, but not modify rest of profile.
I figured out that unprivileged users who are given right "Modify self"
will be able to change password but not rest of profile.
I also figured out that if in a queue I gile the right "SeeQueue" to
unprivileged users, they they will be able to see the queue when they
click "Create ticket" button.
But how can I give them the right to search the ticket database? They
should be able to search the queues which give them "See queue" privilege.
Tomasz Wlodek | tel 631-344-7448
Brookhaven Laboratory, Building 510M | fax 631-344-7616
Upton NY 11973-5000 |
From tomw at bnl.gov Thu Jun 8 17:53:19 2006
From: tomw at bnl.gov (Tomasz Wlodek)
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 17:53:19 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [rt-users] Re: read-only user rights.
In-Reply-To:
References:
<20060608160736.GE7717@staff.dca.net>
<44885922.2070203@ucrwcu.rwc.uc.edu>
Message-ID:
Ok, If I did not express myself clearly:
right now unprivileges users can only modify their passwords, but not rest
of profile, and they are not allowed to search ticket database.
If I make them privileged they can search the tickets, but also can modify
their profile.
I want middle road: I want users be able to search tickets, but I do not
want them to change their profile, exept password.
How to do this?
Tomasz Wlodek | tel 631-344-7448
Brookhaven Laboratory, Building 510M | fax 631-344-7616
Upton NY 11973-5000 |
On Thu, 8 Jun 2006, Tomasz Wlodek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Imagine that I have a group, non_experts, where I keep people who can
> logon to RT web site, can post tickets, can see certain queues (but not
> all) and can search tickets in those queues (but not all). Those users
> should be able to change their password, but not modify rest of profile.
>
> I figured out that unprivileged users who are given right "Modify self"
> will be able to change password but not rest of profile.
>
> I also figured out that if in a queue I gile the right "SeeQueue" to
> unprivileged users, they they will be able to see the queue when they
> click "Create ticket" button.
>
> But how can I give them the right to search the ticket database? They
> should be able to search the queues which give them "See queue" privilege.
>
> Tomasz Wlodek | tel 631-344-7448
> Brookhaven Laboratory, Building 510M | fax 631-344-7616
> Upton NY 11973-5000 |
>
>
From checkpoint at ozbergs.com Thu Jun 8 18:12:04 2006
From: checkpoint at ozbergs.com (Stevo)
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 15:12:04 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] Customizing MyTickets
Message-ID: <4488A0B4.8030504@ozbergs.com>
Hey Team,
Currently the RT homepage shows "10 highest priority tickets I own...".
How can I change that to show a different number of tickets? Like 20
for example?
Thanks
Stevo
From JLim at netopia.com Thu Jun 8 19:15:22 2006
From: JLim at netopia.com (Lim, Justin)
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 19:15:22 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] custom fields on templates
Message-ID: <681060E80F66FC44BE343998E96178BC026C515D@mxma2.corp.netopia.com>
Is there a way to see all of the values stored in $Ticket just for
debugging purposes from the template ?
I am having problems calling CustomField values into the template.
I am including this in my templates
{$Ticket->CustomFieldValues('CustomFieldName')}
and i am recieving
RT::ObjectCustomFieldValues=HASH(0x3932cd0)
RT::ObjectCustomFieldValues=HASH(0x3931640)
instead of the values.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From lvanderf at internode.com.au Thu Jun 8 19:54:52 2006
From: lvanderf at internode.com.au (Luke Vanderfluit)
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 09:24:52 +0930
Subject: [rt-users] question about mysqldump
Message-ID: <4488B8CC.3060305@internode.com.au>
Hi.
I had a problem with mysqldump where a max_allowed_packet error occurred
on the Attachments table.
The myslqdump cron command I had was:
02 23 * * * cd /home/ticket/dbbackups &&
/usr/local/mysql/bin/mysqldump --opt --skip-extended-insert
--skip-lock-tables --single-transaction --complete-insert
--max_allowed_packet=32M rt3 | bzip2 -9 > rt3.out-`date +\%Y\%m\%d-\%H`.bz2
the error was:
mysqldump: Error 2020: Got packet bigger than 'max_allowed_packet' bytes
when dumping table `Attachments` at row: 1784599
inserting the '--default-character-set=binary' directive as in:
02 23 * * * cd /home/ticket/dbbackups &&
/usr/local/mysql/bin/mysqldump --opt --skip-extended-insert
--skip-lock-tables --single-transaction --complete-insert
--max_allowed_packet=32M --default-character-set=binary rt3 | bzip2 -9 >
rt3.out-`date +\%Y\%m\%d-\%H`.bz2
prevented the error from occurring, but the dump file is somewhat
smaller and the dump completed somewhat earlier.
Does anyone have experience with adding this directive and can comment
on the size of the file and completion time before and after?
Is the earlier completion and smaller dump-file size a cause for concern?
Any help greatly appreciated.
Kind regards.
--
Luke Vanderfluit.
Analyst/Programmer.
Internode Systems Pty. Ltd.
From michael at staff.esc.net.au Thu Jun 8 20:27:49 2006
From: michael at staff.esc.net.au (michael at staff.esc.net.au)
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 09:57:49 +0930
Subject: [rt-users] where is the requestor stored?
Message-ID: <20060609002748.B1533624FBF@sr-gw.esc.net.au>
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone could tell me where in the database the requestor
is stored.
This is part of the perl script I am using to create the ticket:
my $CurrentUser = RT::Interface::CLI::GetCurrentUser();
my $ticket = new RT::Ticket($CurrentUser);
my $ticket_body = MIME::Entity->build(Data => "
This is a test ticket
",
Type => 'text/plain');
my %ticket_vals = ( Queue => 'Test',
Subject => 'Tetst',
Owner => 'Nobody',
Requestor => "test\@mydomain.com",
InitialPriority => '10',
FinalPriority => '25',
MIMEObj => $ticket_body,
);
my ($id, $transaction_object, $err) = $ticket->Create(%ticket_vals);
The ticket is created without a problem, I just need to know where the
requestor is being stored in the mysql database.
I have looked in the Tickets and Transactions tables, but it does not appear
to be in there.
Can anyone point me in the right direction?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From David.Di at sssworldwide.com Thu Jun 8 21:34:05 2006
From: David.Di at sssworldwide.com (David Di)
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 09:34:05 +0800
Subject: [rt-users] where is the requestor stored?
Message-ID: <945FE1E5D67B3343B3FA37F36FDD0A178F8E@cyntxms01.AD.SSS>
Hi Michael,
Requestor is stored as a group record's, you can find it in table
Groups, where the column Instance is the ticket id. And from the table
GroupMembers you can get this group's member. Take a look at the example
below.
1. Record in Groups:
+--------+------+-------------+-----------------+-----------+----------+
| id | Name | Description | Domain | Type | Instance |
+--------+------+-------------+-----------------+-----------+----------+
| 229203 | NULL | NULL | RT::Ticket-Role | Requestor | 56673 |
2. Respective record in GroupMembers:
+--------+---------+----------+
| id | GroupId | MemberId |
+--------+---------+----------+
| 129629 | 229203 | 186716 |
So you can get the GroupId from the Groups record by searching for
Instance=TicketId, and then from GroupMembers record you can get the
MemberId by searching for GroupId, then the MemberId is the user's id in
Users table.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
David
-----Original Message-----
From: rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com
[mailto:rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of
michael at staff.esc.net.au
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 8:28 AM
To: rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: [rt-users] where is the requestor stored?
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone could tell me where in the database
the requestor is stored.
This is part of the perl script I am using to create the ticket:
my $CurrentUser = RT::Interface::CLI::GetCurrentUser();
my $ticket = new RT::Ticket($CurrentUser);
my $ticket_body = MIME::Entity->build(Data => "
This is a test ticket
",
Type => 'text/plain');
my %ticket_vals = ( Queue => 'Test',
Subject => 'Tetst',
Owner => 'Nobody',
Requestor => "test\@mydomain.com",
InitialPriority => '10',
FinalPriority => '25',
MIMEObj => $ticket_body,
);
my ($id, $transaction_object, $err) =
$ticket->Create(%ticket_vals);
The ticket is created without a problem, I just need to know
where the requestor is being stored in the mysql database.
I have looked in the Tickets and Transactions tables, but it
does not appear to be in there.
Can anyone point me in the right direction?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From pkime at Shopzilla.com Thu Jun 8 23:12:25 2006
From: pkime at Shopzilla.com (Philip Kime)
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 20:12:25 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] New queues not visible in RT 3.6rc3?
Message-ID: <58B1112F0EEB7349AE14A0AA46F9CEC00137ABEA@szexchange.Shopzilla.inc>
When I create a new Queue in 3.6rc3, I can see it in the Queue list and
it's enabled as etc. but it won't appear in the Quick Ticket creation
dropdown or, for example, the Queue list when I try to move a ticket to
another Queue? It seems to be related to the session cache hash - the
code never seems to enter the part which would really populate the
drop-down since it uses the cache. There doesn't apear to be anything in
the $rtroot/var/session_data directory, I've cleared the Mason object
cache, I've restarted RT etc. etc. but nothing seem to work to get new
Queues to appear in the usual drop-downs?
PK
--
Philip Kime
NOPS Systems Architect
310 401 0407
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From todd at chaka.net Thu Jun 8 23:20:09 2006
From: todd at chaka.net (Todd Chapman)
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 23:20:09 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] New queues not visible in RT 3.6rc3?
In-Reply-To: <58B1112F0EEB7349AE14A0AA46F9CEC00137ABEA@szexchange.Shopzilla.inc>
References: <58B1112F0EEB7349AE14A0AA46F9CEC00137ABEA@szexchange.Shopzilla.inc>
Message-ID: <20060609032009.GH26200@chaka.net>
The queues you can create tickets in are cached. Logging
out and back in should show you new queues.
-Todd
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 08:12:25PM -0700, Philip Kime wrote:
> When I create a new Queue in 3.6rc3, I can see it in the Queue list and
> it's enabled as etc. but it won't appear in the Quick Ticket creation
> dropdown or, for example, the Queue list when I try to move a ticket to
> another Queue? It seems to be related to the session cache hash - the
> code never seems to enter the part which would really populate the
> drop-down since it uses the cache. There doesn't apear to be anything in
> the $rtroot/var/session_data directory, I've cleared the Mason object
> cache, I've restarted RT etc. etc. but nothing seem to work to get new
> Queues to appear in the usual drop-downs?
>
> PK
>
> --
> Philip Kime
> NOPS Systems Architect
> 310 401 0407
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
>
>
> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>
>
> We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical: http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
From pkime at Shopzilla.com Thu Jun 8 23:20:59 2006
From: pkime at Shopzilla.com (Philip Kime)
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 20:20:59 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] New queues not visible in RT 3.6rc3?
Message-ID: <58B1112F0EEB7349AE14A0AA46F9CEC00137ABEB@szexchange.Shopzilla.inc>
Yes, just realised, sorry - I was used to the older behaviour ...
PK
-----Original Message-----
From: Todd Chapman [mailto:todd at chaka.net]
Sent: 08 June 2006 20:20
To: Philip Kime
Cc: RT users
Subject: Re: [rt-users] New queues not visible in RT 3.6rc3?
The queues you can create tickets in are cached. Logging out and back in
should show you new queues.
-Todd
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 08:12:25PM -0700, Philip Kime wrote:
> When I create a new Queue in 3.6rc3, I can see it in the Queue list
> and it's enabled as etc. but it won't appear in the Quick Ticket
> creation dropdown or, for example, the Queue list when I try to move a
> ticket to another Queue? It seems to be related to the session cache
> hash - the code never seems to enter the part which would really
> populate the drop-down since it uses the cache. There doesn't apear to
> be anything in the $rtroot/var/session_data directory, I've cleared
> the Mason object cache, I've restarted RT etc. etc. but nothing seem
> to work to get new Queues to appear in the usual drop-downs?
>
> PK
>
> --
> Philip Kime
> NOPS Systems Architect
> 310 401 0407
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com Commercial support:
> sales at bestpractical.com
>
>
> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>
>
> We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical:
> http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
From JLim at netopia.com Fri Jun 9 00:41:31 2006
From: JLim at netopia.com (Lim, Justin)
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 00:41:31 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] order of scrips
Message-ID: <681060E80F66FC44BE343998E96178BC026C5185@mxma2.corp.netopia.com>
Can the order of scrip execution be changed ?
i have noticed that the autoreply email is sent first then the values
from the customfields are taken in so when i try to put the contents of
the customfields it does not display in the emails since the values are
null due to the fact that the autoreply is sent first.
i have tried to put the extract customfields scrip to run on create then
autorespond to run on transition but that generates n-1 # of emails
where n = # of customfields.
is there a better way to handle this ?
Thanks
desperately looking for help...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From dshannon at techfluent.com Fri Jun 9 02:38:24 2006
From: dshannon at techfluent.com (Duncan Shannon)
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 01:38:24 -0500
Subject: [rt-users] Customizing MyTickets
Message-ID: <2B7B7880538AA440B5FBCE7A56E8CB4527C2DD@TF-FS2.internal.techfluent.com>
> How can I change that to show a different number of tickets? Like 20
> for example?
Tisk tisk! A FAQ!
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/engine?list=rt&do=search_results&s
earch_forum=forum_3&search_string=10+highest+priority+tickets+I+own&sear
ch_type=AND
or http://tinyurl.com/flwyp if that breaks in your mail client
duncan
From todd at chaka.net Fri Jun 9 02:55:11 2006
From: todd at chaka.net (Todd Chapman)
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 02:55:11 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] order of scrips
In-Reply-To: <681060E80F66FC44BE343998E96178BC026C5185@mxma2.corp.netopia.com>
References: <681060E80F66FC44BE343998E96178BC026C5185@mxma2.corp.netopia.com>
Message-ID: <20060609065511.GI26200@chaka.net>
Scrips can be ordered in 3.6. I think it does it by sorting on name.
-Todd
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 12:41:31AM -0400, Lim, Justin wrote:
> Can the order of scrip execution be changed ?
>
> i have noticed that the autoreply email is sent first then the values
> from the customfields are taken in so when i try to put the contents of
> the customfields it does not display in the emails since the values are
> null due to the fact that the autoreply is sent first.
>
> i have tried to put the extract customfields scrip to run on create then
> autorespond to run on transition but that generates n-1 # of emails
> where n = # of customfields.
>
> is there a better way to handle this ?
>
> Thanks
> desperately looking for help...
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
>
>
> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>
>
> We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical: http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
From uli.staerk at globalways.net Fri Jun 9 04:44:14 2006
From: uli.staerk at globalways.net (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Uli_St=E4rk?=)
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 10:44:14 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] Customer access to rt
Message-ID:
I want to allow customers to use the RT, too.
Once RT receives an e-mail from a new emailadress, an RT-account should be automatically created (password generated randomly) for this email address. Then this authentication-info should be sent to the customer as a welcome message with a couple of instructions how to use the RT. So if the customer accesses the RT he should see all his open and closed tickets and can perform actions like close ticket, reopen ticket, reply.
Is there any existing extension for rt?
From uli.staerk at globalways.net Fri Jun 9 05:49:19 2006
From: uli.staerk at globalways.net (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Uli_St=E4rk?=)
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 11:49:19 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] No confirmation for a new ticket
Message-ID:
How can I create a rule that does not send any status-change-emails for a special incoming e-mail address?
Eg:
domain-robot at company.com -> no notice of receipt and no ticket-close-email
From barnesaw at ucrwcu.rwc.uc.edu Fri Jun 9 08:48:33 2006
From: barnesaw at ucrwcu.rwc.uc.edu (Drew Barnes)
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 08:48:33 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Customer access to rt
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID: <44896E21.4030707@ucrwcu.rwc.uc.edu>
Search Wiki for "password". It should be near the top.
Uli St?rk wrote:
> I want to allow customers to use the RT, too.
> Once RT receives an e-mail from a new emailadress, an RT-account should be automatically created (password generated randomly) for this email address. Then this authentication-info should be sent to the customer as a welcome message with a couple of instructions how to use the RT. So if the customer accesses the RT he should see all his open and closed tickets and can perform actions like close ticket, reopen ticket, reply.
>
> Is there any existing extension for rt?
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
>
>
> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>
>
> We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical: http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
>
--
Drew Barnes
Applications Analyst
Raymond Walters College
University of Cincinnati
From JLim at netopia.com Fri Jun 9 09:18:00 2006
From: JLim at netopia.com (Lim, Justin)
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 09:18:00 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] order of scrips
Message-ID: <681060E80F66FC44BE343998E96178BC026C522D@mxma2.corp.netopia.com>
I am trying to do 2 things on "ON CREATE"
First is extract custom fields then send an autoreply with the custom
fields in the content of the email.
When the scrip is setup for on create on both no matter what the
description name is it is still sending the autoresponse first...
-----Original Message-----
From: Todd Chapman [mailto:todd at chaka.net]
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 1:55 AM
To: Lim, Justin
Cc: RT-Users at lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: Re: [rt-users] order of scrips
Scrips can be ordered in 3.6. I think it does it by sorting on name.
-Todd
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 12:41:31AM -0400, Lim, Justin wrote:
> Can the order of scrip execution be changed ?
>
> i have noticed that the autoreply email is sent first then the values
> from the customfields are taken in so when i try to put the contents
> of the customfields it does not display in the emails since the values
> are null due to the fact that the autoreply is sent first.
>
> i have tried to put the extract customfields scrip to run on create
> then autorespond to run on transition but that generates n-1 # of
> emails where n = # of customfields.
>
> is there a better way to handle this ?
>
> Thanks
> desperately looking for help...
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com Commercial support:
> sales at bestpractical.com
>
>
> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>
>
> We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical:
> http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
From ffarid at pragmatic-source.com Fri Jun 9 09:33:10 2006
From: ffarid at pragmatic-source.com (Farzad FARID)
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 15:33:10 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] Handling millions of tickets with RT?
Message-ID: <44897896.9090107@pragmatic-source.com>
Hi,
The customer I'm working for has deployed a customized RT version 3.0.10
to handle incoming and outgoing customers emails. With the actual
configuration and recent database optimisations (MySQL 4.0 on a 4 Gb RAM
server, 3 web frontends), the system can handle about 700.000 tickets /
2.100.000 transactions and 100 simultaneous users without slowing down
too much.
But whenever this limit is reached every 3 or 4 months, we have to
create another database instance and restart from scratch, which is a
painful process technically speaking, and it causes some problems on the
business side too (for example because the same tickets Id are being
reused, or because a conversation started in one instance cannot be
continued in the new, empty instance).
With recent RT version is it possible to:
* handle millions of tickets tickets in a single databases? That is:
keeping many years of history online.
or
* Easily archive old tickets/transaction in another database, while
keeping it online, and easily reachable by users?
o This way the main database would remain small and
responsive, while historical data would still be available
at the cost of a longer access time.
And is there a migration path between RT 3.0.10 and the up to date
release 3.4.5?
And a last remark concerning the Wiki: yesterday I found lots of page
content destroyed and replaced by spam! I reverted the content to the
original one on 2 or 3 pages but I think it'd be best to
password-protect the whole wiki.
Regards
--
Farzad FARID
Architecte Open Source / Pragmatic Source
http://www.pragmatic-source.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From jesse at bestpractical.com Fri Jun 9 11:05:00 2006
From: jesse at bestpractical.com (Jesse Vincent)
Date: 09 Jun 2006 11:05:00 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] No confirmation for a new ticket
Message-ID: <3232695921.396550@fsck.com>
the clever hack is to create a user who has that email address as a username and no email address
Best,
Jesse
--
This message was sent from my Treo. Please accept my apologies for its brevity and for any typos.
-----Original Message-----
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Uli_St=E4rk?=
Date: Friday, Jun 9, 2006 5:49 am
Subject: [rt-users] No confirmation for a new ticket
How can I create a rule that does not send any status-change-emails for a special incoming e-mail address?
Eg:
domain-robot at company.com -> no notice of receipt and no ticket-close-email
_______________________________________________
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical: http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
From jesse at bestpractical.com Fri Jun 9 11:15:00 2006
From: jesse at bestpractical.com (Jesse Vincent)
Date: 09 Jun 2006 11:15:00 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Adding external links to menus
Message-ID: <3232696504.453920@fsck.com>
I'm pretty sure we've fixed this in a more recent rt.
Best,
Jesse
--
This message was sent from my Treo. Please accept my apologies for its brevity and for any typos.
-----Original Message-----
From: "Millard, Matt"
Date: Thursday, Jun 8, 2006 4:59 pm
Subject: [rt-users] Adding external links to menus
I'd like to add some external links to the "Tools" menu for apps we use
to reset passwords, manage user and group id's etc. How do I link
externally? When I modify the local Tools/Elements/Tabs file to point
to the pages I end up with links that are relative.
For example:
http://rt.server.host.com/https://server2.host.com/cgi-bin/reset.cgi
my $tabs = { A => { title => loc('Password Reset'),
path =>
'https://server2.host.com/cgi-bin/reset.cgi',
},
B => { 'title' => loc('Offline'),
path => 'Tools/Offline.html',
},
};
This is with RT 3.4.2
Matt
-----Message Disclaimer-----
This e-mail message is intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.
If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
reply email to Connect at principal.com and delete or destroy all copies of
the original message and attachments thereto. Email sent to or from the
Principal Financial Group or any of its member companies may be retained
as required by law or regulation.
Nothing in this message is intended to constitute an Electronic signature
for purposes of the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA) or the
Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act ("E-Sign")
unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in this message.
_______________________________________________
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical: http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
From jesse at bestpractical.com Fri Jun 9 11:39:00 2006
From: jesse at bestpractical.com (Jesse Vincent)
Date: 09 Jun 2006 11:39:00 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Segmentation Fault
Message-ID: <3232697956.598565@fsck.com>
this usually indicates a bad dso mod_perl 1.0 build
Best,
Jesse
--
This message was sent from my Treo. Please accept my apologies for its brevity and for any typos.
-----Original Message-----
From: Nazar Kulynych
Date: Wednesday, Jun 7, 2006 5:12 pm
Subject: [rt-users] Segmentation Fault
I have recently installed RT 3.4.5, when I try to add users I get the following message in my apache error_log.
[Wed Jun 07 23:17:36 2006] [notice] child pid 18164 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
[Wed Jun 7 20:17:36 2006] [crit]: Transaction not committed. Usually indicates a software fault.Data loss may have occurred (/www/apps/rt-3.4.5/lib/RT/Interface/Web/Handler.pm:205)
Any idea?
thanks
Nazar
_______________________________________________
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical: http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
From jboris at adphila.org Fri Jun 9 12:17:46 2006
From: jboris at adphila.org (John Boris)
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 12:17:46 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Trying to use RTFM
Message-ID:
I am not sure if this is the correct list. I have RT 3.4.5 installed and
RTFM-2.2.0RC2 installed. When I try to run make initdb I get this
error:
make initdb
/usr/bin/perl -Ilib -I/opt/rt3/lib /opt/rt3/sbin/rt-setup-database
--action schema --datadir etc --datafile etc/initialdata --dba rt_user
DBI connect('dbname=rt3;host=localhost','rt_user',...) failed: Access
denied for user 'rt_user'@'localhost' (using password: NO) at
/opt/rt3/sbin/rt-setup-database line 170
Failed to connect to dbi:mysql:;host=localhost as rt_user: Access
denied for user 'rt_user'@'localhost' (using password: NO) at
/opt/rt3/sbin/rt-setup-database line 170.
...returned with error: 65280
make: *** [initdb] Error 255
Do I have to setup any Enviroemnnt variables? Ihave RTUSER and user set
to my mysql user.
TIA
John J. Boris, Sr.
JEN-A-SyS Administrator
Archdiocese of Philadelphia
"Remember! That light at the end of the tunnel
Just might be the headlight of an oncoming train!"
From checkpoint at ozbergs.com Fri Jun 9 13:23:52 2006
From: checkpoint at ozbergs.com (Stevo)
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 10:23:52 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] SelectRequestor Question
Message-ID: <4489AEA8.8070903@ozbergs.com>
Hey Team,
I just found the SelectRequestor code
(http://wiki.bestpractical.com/index.cgi?SelectRequestor) which allows
you to select a user when creating a ticket which is awesome! I can't
tell you how many 'bad' users have been created by my operators because
they fat fingered an email address!
I have one question.... I'm not much of a coder (at all) and I'd like to
remove the Organization piece of this code. All my users are internal
to the Company, so the Org field is of no relevance to me.
Is there any easy way to remove that and just have the username selectable?
Thanks a bunch!
-Stevo
From dlamers at elcan.com Fri Jun 9 14:00:17 2006
From: dlamers at elcan.com (Lamers, Dan)
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 14:00:17 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Trying to use RTFM
Message-ID: <0FB8C170485E29419C3ADAC3A13886CA033F545A@EMEXCH004002>
Make sure that you set the user and password in MySql using this command:
grant all on rtdb.* to rtuser at localhost identified by 'wibble';
and make sure that your RT_SiteConfig.pm file matches the MySql
Set($DatabaseUser , 'rtuser');
Set($DatabasePassword , 'wibble');
Set($DatabaseName , 'rtdb');
Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com
[mailto:rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com]On Behalf Of John Boris
Sent: June 9, 2006 12:18 PM
To: rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: [rt-users] Trying to use RTFM
I am not sure if this is the correct list. I have RT 3.4.5 installed and
RTFM-2.2.0RC2 installed. When I try to run make initdb I get this
error:
make initdb
/usr/bin/perl -Ilib -I/opt/rt3/lib /opt/rt3/sbin/rt-setup-database
--action schema --datadir etc --datafile etc/initialdata --dba rt_user
DBI connect('dbname=rt3;host=localhost','rt_user',...) failed: Access
denied for user 'rt_user'@'localhost' (using password: NO) at
/opt/rt3/sbin/rt-setup-database line 170
Failed to connect to dbi:mysql:;host=localhost as rt_user: Access
denied for user 'rt_user'@'localhost' (using password: NO) at
/opt/rt3/sbin/rt-setup-database line 170.
...returned with error: 65280
make: *** [initdb] Error 255
Do I have to setup any Enviroemnnt variables? Ihave RTUSER and user set
to my mysql user.
TIA
John J. Boris, Sr.
JEN-A-SyS Administrator
Archdiocese of Philadelphia
"Remember! That light at the end of the tunnel
Just might be the headlight of an oncoming train!"
_______________________________________________
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical:
http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
DISCLAIMER: The information in this message is confidential and may be
legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
message by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended
recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution of the message, or any
action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be
unlawful. Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this
message in error. Thank you.
From jboris at adphila.org Fri Jun 9 14:08:35 2006
From: jboris at adphila.org (John Boris)
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 14:08:35 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Trying to use RTFM
Message-ID:
Thanks. I manually edited the lines that were complaining based on a
reply I just received and that worked. I thought I had it configured as
you write here but I guess I had something misconfigured. It is working
now. Thanks for the replies.
>>> "Lamers, Dan" 06/09/06 2:00 PM >>>
Make sure that you set the user and password in MySql using this
command:
grant all on rtdb.* to rtuser at localhost identified by 'wibble';
and make sure that your RT_SiteConfig.pm file matches the MySql
Set($DatabaseUser , 'rtuser');
Set($DatabasePassword , 'wibble');
Set($DatabaseName , 'rtdb');
Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com
[mailto:rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com]On Behalf Of John
Boris
Sent: June 9, 2006 12:18 PM
To: rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: [rt-users] Trying to use RTFM
I am not sure if this is the correct list. I have RT 3.4.5 installed
and
RTFM-2.2.0RC2 installed. When I try to run make initdb I get this
error:
make initdb
/usr/bin/perl -Ilib -I/opt/rt3/lib /opt/rt3/sbin/rt-setup-database
--action schema --datadir etc --datafile etc/initialdata --dba rt_user
DBI connect('dbname=rt3;host=localhost','rt_user',...) failed: Access
denied for user 'rt_user'@'localhost' (using password: NO) at
/opt/rt3/sbin/rt-setup-database line 170
Failed to connect to dbi:mysql:;host=localhost as rt_user: Access
denied for user 'rt_user'@'localhost' (using password: NO) at
/opt/rt3/sbin/rt-setup-database line 170.
...returned with error: 65280
make: *** [initdb] Error 255
Do I have to setup any Enviroemnnt variables? Ihave RTUSER and user
set
to my mysql user.
TIA
John J. Boris, Sr.
JEN-A-SyS Administrator
Archdiocese of Philadelphia
"Remember! That light at the end of the tunnel
Just might be the headlight of an oncoming train!"
_______________________________________________
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical:
http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
DISCLAIMER: The information in this message is confidential and may be
legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to
this
message by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended
recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution of the message, or
any
action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and
may be
unlawful. Please immediately contact the sender if you have received
this
message in error. Thank you.
From KFCrocker at lbl.gov Fri Jun 9 15:48:57 2006
From: KFCrocker at lbl.gov (Kenneth Crocker)
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 12:48:57 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] Global configuratiopn for AdminCc's
Message-ID: <4489D0A9.3060201@lbl.gov>
We have been using RT 3.4.4 on Oracle 9 (whatever) since it came out and
I'm just now thinking "why set up AdminCc privileges for each Queue when
I can do it Globally"? Dumb, I know. I should have thought of it before.
Now, as I go about doing this, I noticed that at the Queue level, there
is no "SeeConfigTab" right but there is at the Global level. When I
removed all rights from the AdminCc role in all Queues and set up the
Global privileges for AdminCc and applied the "SeeConfigTab" right, my
AdminCc's (those users set up as an AdminCc watcher for each respective
Queue) could not see the configuration option on their screens. Why is
that? When I had them set up individually for each Queue, I had to give
the individual user (the one named as AdminCc watcher in that Queue)
that right as a user because it wasn't offered at the Queue level for
AdminCcs. However, since it is at the global level I figured that would
suffice. So what am I missing? Is there another right that must be
granted in conjunction with the "SeeConfigTab" privilege?
Kenn Crocker
LBNL
From ocraig at stillsecure.com Fri Jun 9 20:04:15 2006
From: ocraig at stillsecure.com (Ole Craig)
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 18:04:15 -0600
Subject: [rt-users] 3.6.x: http/https with the same RT instance?
Message-ID: <1149897855.8584.295.camel@hex.latis.com>
Is it possible to provide http and https access to the same RT instance
without running completely separate configuration trees and mason
caches?
I have a setup now where the only difference between the http instance
and the https instance is that the former is defined within a
container and the latter is within a container. Most things seem to work seamlessly; the only
exception (and it's a doozy) I've found so far is the "create" button
from the "new ticket in ___ queue" screen. Is there a reason this button
needs to force a canonical URL instead of using a relative?
The reason I'd like to provide plaintext http is to avoid the SSL
performance hit for internal users, but I'd like external users to be
able to connect securely. Do I really need a duplicate setup to do that?
--
/Ole Craig
Security Engineer
303-381-3802 (main support hotline)
303-381-3824 (my direct line)
303-381-3801 (fax)
www.stillsecure.com
. . .
From ocraig at stillsecure.com Fri Jun 9 21:12:39 2006
From: ocraig at stillsecure.com (Ole Craig)
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 19:12:39 -0600
Subject: [rt-users] 3.6.x: http/https with the same RT instance?
In-Reply-To: <70fbbb000606091752n682edfe2gc8674dd2b177e15f@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1149897855.8584.295.camel@hex.latis.com>
<70fbbb000606091752n682edfe2gc8674dd2b177e15f@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1149901959.8584.312.camel@hex.latis.com>
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 19:52 -0500, TechnoSophos wrote:
> Are you using mod_perl, fastcgi, or fcgid?
>
Sorry, should have thought to include more info.
CentOS 4.3
perl 5.8.5
FastCGI 2.4.2
apache 2.0.52
mysql 4.1.12
--
/Ole Craig
Security Engineer
303-381-3802 (main support hotline)
303-381-3824 (my direct line)
303-381-3801 (fax)
www.stillsecure.com
. . .
From msnyder at servervault.com Fri Jun 9 21:30:17 2006
From: msnyder at servervault.com (Mathew Snyder)
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 21:30:17 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] 3.6.0 Official Release
Message-ID: <448A20A9.7050705@servervault.com>
Is there a proposed release date for 3.6.0 as a stable platform?
--
Mathew Snyder
Systems Administrator
Network+
ServerVault TechOps
From nazark at auska.com Fri Jun 9 21:38:21 2006
From: nazark at auska.com (Nazar Kulynych)
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 21:38:21 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Segmentation Fault
In-Reply-To: <3232697956.598565@fsck.com>
References: <3232697956.598565@fsck.com>
Message-ID: <448A228D.7020102@auska.com>
I have this $ENV
apache-2.0.58
rt-3.4.5
perl-5.8.5
mod_perl-2.0.2
apache and mod_perl compiled statically.
Thanks
Nazar
this usually indicates a bad dso mod_perl 1.0 build
Best,
Jesse
-- This message was sent from my Treo. Please accept my apologies for
its brevity and for any typos. -----Original Message----- From: Nazar
Kulynych Date: Wednesday, Jun 7, 2006 5:12 pm
Subject: [rt-users] Segmentation Fault I have recently installed RT
3.4.5, when I try to add users I get the following message in my apache
error_log. [Wed Jun 07 23:17:36 2006] [notice] child pid 18164 exit
signal Segmentation fault (11) [Wed Jun 7 20:17:36 2006] [crit]:
Transaction not committed. Usually indicates a software fault.Data loss
may have occurred
(/www/apps/rt-3.4.5/lib/RT/Interface/Web/Handler.pm:205) Any idea?
thanks Nazar _______________________________________________
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com Commercial support:
sales at bestpractical.com Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials
from O'Reilly Media. Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com We're
hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical:
http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
From pavel.ruzicka at i.cz Sat Jun 10 06:32:40 2006
From: pavel.ruzicka at i.cz (Pavel Ruzicka)
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 12:32:40 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] mysqldump refusing to finish
In-Reply-To: <44860AB2.5050806@internode.com.au>
References: <44860AB2.5050806@internode.com.au>
Message-ID: <448A9FC8.7040704@i.cz>
try "mysqldump -q"
ruza
On 07/06/06 01:07, Luke Vanderfluit wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I have a cron job that does a database backup for RT.
> That backup is currently failing with the following error:
>
> mysqldump: Error 2020: Got packet bigger than 'max_allowed_packet' bytes
> when dumping table `Attachments` at row: 1784599
>
> My mysqldump command looks like this:
>
> /usr/local/mysql/bin/mysqldump --opt --skip-extended-insert
> --skip-lock-tables --single-transaction --complete-insert
> --max_allowed_packet=32M rt3 | bzip2 -9 > rt3.out-`date +\%Y\%m\%d-\%H`.bz2
>
>
> I could increase the 'max_allowed_packet' setting.
> I could add '--default-character-set=binary'.
>
> Would these help?
> Does anyone have any other suggestions?
>
> Kind regards.
>
--
Pavel Ruzicka, ICZ
*** ICZ a.s. ******************************
Hvezdova 1689/2a, 140 00 Prague 4, CZ
tel: +420 24 41 00 111 _
Fax: +420 24 41 00 222 @_}-,^--`--
GSM: +420 724 429 641
mailto:pavel.ruzicka at i.cz http://www.i.cz
*******************************************
From pkime at Shopzilla.com Sun Jun 11 16:56:12 2006
From: pkime at Shopzilla.com (Philip Kime)
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 13:56:12 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] The "fsck.com-rt-" URI scheme
Message-ID: <58B1112F0EEB7349AE14A0AA46F9CEC00137ABF6@szexchange.Shopzilla.inc>
Will this URI scheme thing be continued in later versions of RT? I
remember JV saying that it probably wouldn't. I'm wondering if it's
worth bothering with generating patches to get rid of the hard-coded
"fsck.com-rt-" scheme because I need to use a lot of REST calls making
links etc. and every ticket like comes out as "fsck.com-rt-" ...
PK
--
Philip Kime
NOPS Systems Architect
310 401 0407
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From jesse at bestpractical.com Sun Jun 11 16:59:11 2006
From: jesse at bestpractical.com (Jesse Vincent)
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 16:59:11 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] The "fsck.com-rt-" URI scheme
In-Reply-To: <58B1112F0EEB7349AE14A0AA46F9CEC00137ABF6@szexchange.Shopzilla.inc>
References: <58B1112F0EEB7349AE14A0AA46F9CEC00137ABF6@szexchange.Shopzilla.inc>
Message-ID: <20060611205910.GN8022@bestpractical.com>
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 01:56:12PM -0700, Philip Kime wrote:
> Will this URI scheme thing be continued in later versions of RT? I
> remember JV saying that it probably wouldn't.
When did I say this?
From pkime at Shopzilla.com Sun Jun 11 16:59:09 2006
From: pkime at Shopzilla.com (Philip Kime)
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 13:59:09 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] The "fsck.com-rt-" URI scheme
Message-ID: <58B1112F0EEB7349AE14A0AA46F9CEC00137ABF7@szexchange.Shopzilla.inc>
You may well not have done ... I just remembered something about
wanting to take it away but not wanting to break too much stuff ...?
PK
-----Original Message-----
From: Jesse Vincent [mailto:jesse at bestpractical.com]
Sent: 11 June 2006 13:59
To: Philip Kime
Cc: RT users
Subject: Re: [rt-users] The "fsck.com-rt-" URI scheme
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 01:56:12PM -0700, Philip Kime wrote:
> Will this URI scheme thing be continued in later versions of RT? I
> remember JV saying that it probably wouldn't.
When did I say this?
From todd at chaka.net Sun Jun 11 18:46:33 2006
From: todd at chaka.net (Todd Chapman)
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 18:46:33 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] The "fsck.com-rt-" URI scheme
In-Reply-To: <58B1112F0EEB7349AE14A0AA46F9CEC00137ABF6@szexchange.Shopzilla.inc>
References: <58B1112F0EEB7349AE14A0AA46F9CEC00137ABF6@szexchange.Shopzilla.inc>
Message-ID: <20060611224633.GJ26200@chaka.net>
All tickets should have fsck.com-rt schemes. Why would that be
a problem?
-Todd
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 01:56:12PM -0700, Philip Kime wrote:
> Will this URI scheme thing be continued in later versions of RT? I
> remember JV saying that it probably wouldn't. I'm wondering if it's
> worth bothering with generating patches to get rid of the hard-coded
> "fsck.com-rt-" scheme because I need to use a lot of REST calls making
> links etc. and every ticket like comes out as "fsck.com-rt-" ...
>
> PK
>
> --
> Philip Kime
> NOPS Systems Architect
> 310 401 0407
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
>
>
> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>
>
> We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical: http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
From pkime at Shopzilla.com Sun Jun 11 18:50:34 2006
From: pkime at Shopzilla.com (Philip Kime)
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 15:50:34 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] The "fsck.com-rt-" URI scheme
Message-ID: <58B1112F0EEB7349AE14A0AA46F9CEC00137ABF8@szexchange.Shopzilla.inc>
I was more wondering how hard it would be to just default them to an
"rt" scheme since it would seem to make more sense for people who have
nothing to do with the fsck.com domain. Even RT has nothing to do with
the fsck.com domain now since I believe it was the author's personal
domain when it was first being developed.
The at scheme is just "at", it would be nice for rt to be just "rt"
unless you really want a scheme prefix of something else which could be
a config file setting.
As an exercise, I created an "rt" scheme and altered Record.pm,
Ticket_Overlay.pm and URI.pm but in 3.6 REST interface, the links still
come out as fsck.com-rt so I've either missed something or something's
in the DB.
PK
-----Original Message-----
From: Todd Chapman [mailto:todd at chaka.net]
Sent: 11 June 2006 15:47
To: Philip Kime
Cc: RT users
Subject: Re: [rt-users] The "fsck.com-rt-" URI scheme
All tickets should have fsck.com-rt schemes. Why would that be a
problem?
-Todd
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 01:56:12PM -0700, Philip Kime wrote:
> Will this URI scheme thing be continued in later versions of RT? I
> remember JV saying that it probably wouldn't. I'm wondering if it's
> worth bothering with generating patches to get rid of the hard-coded
> "fsck.com-rt-" scheme because I need to use a lot of REST calls making
> links etc. and every ticket like comes out as "fsck.com-rt-" ...
>
> PK
>
> --
> Philip Kime
> NOPS Systems Architect
> 310 401 0407
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com Commercial support:
> sales at bestpractical.com
>
>
> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>
>
> We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical:
> http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
From Jan-Peter.Koopmann at seceidos.de Mon Jun 12 03:49:38 2006
From: Jan-Peter.Koopmann at seceidos.de (Koopmann, Jan-Peter)
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 09:49:38 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] Change duedate/priorities from Reply screen
Message-ID:
Hi,
I would love to be able to change the current priority and duedate from
the reply, comment etc. screens. I am sure this can be done with
Overlays/Callbacks but I am not sure how and what to call. Surely
someone already has done this one way or the other.
Any help is greatly appreciated!
Kind regards,
JP
From scoutts at bcs.org.uk Mon Jun 12 05:11:23 2006
From: scoutts at bcs.org.uk (Steven Coutts)
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 10:11:23 +0100
Subject: [rt-users] Any resolution on apache2/mod_perl2 "Out of Memory!"
error on GenToo?
In-Reply-To: <013201c66481$1a8a2e20$ad141eac@TSDYoung>
References: <013201c66481$1a8a2e20$ad141eac@TSDYoung>
Message-ID: <200606121011.23587.scoutts@bcs.org.uk>
Did anyone get anywhere with this?
Think I have the same problem.
On Thursday 20 April 2006 14:48, dyoung-rtusers at techsafari.com wrote:
> Please accept my apologies if this particular dead horse has been
> sufficiently beaten, but I'm new to this list and I've already searched
> through Google as well as the mailing list archives to no avail.
>
> I'm running:
>
> rt-3.4.5
> apache-2.0.55-r1
> mod_perl-2.0.1-r2
> gentoo-sources-2.6.15-r1
> mysql-5.0.19-r1 (was using mysql-4, but found something during my
> searches that suggested upgrading mysql. No apparent effect)
>
> (I'm not sure what other info would be helpful, please let me know
> and I'll be happy to supply)
>
> I was wondering (read: hoping) if this list had already discovered a fix or
> workaround to the "Out of Memory! Callback called exit" error seen in the
> Apache2 error_log when attempting to perform a Ticket Search from within
> the RT website. If so, could someone point me in the proper direction
> (URL, email, carrier pigeon)?
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Donovan
> dyoung rtusers techsafari com
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
>
>
> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>
>
> We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical:
> http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
--
Steven Coutts B.Sc.(Hons) MBCS
scoutts at bcs.org.uk
PGP Public Key
From sturner at MIT.EDU Mon Jun 12 10:27:29 2006
From: sturner at MIT.EDU (Stephen Turner)
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 10:27:29 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] custom fields on templates
Message-ID: <6.2.3.4.2.20060612102635.0394f0b0@po14.mit.edu>
At Thursday 6/8/2006 07:15 PM, you wrote:
>Is there a way to see all of the values stored in $Ticket just for
>debugging purposes from the template ?
>
>I am having problems calling CustomField values into the template.
>
>I am including this in my templates
>
>{$Ticket->CustomFieldValues('CustomFieldName')}
>
>and i am recieving
>
>RT::ObjectCustomFieldValues=HASH(0x3932cd0)
>RT::ObjectCustomFieldValues=HASH(0x3931640)
>
>instead of the values.
Justin,
[apologies for getting your name wrong on my other email!]
Unless you're dealing with a multiple-value CF, you might have better
luck with :
{$Ticket->FirstCustomFieldValue('CustomFieldName')}
If you are using a multi-value CF, you'll have to iterate through the
ObjectCustomFieldValues collection returned by
$Ticket->CustomFieldValues and print each one in turn.
Seeing all the values stored in $Ticket wouldn't help, because
technically the CF values aren't stored in $Ticket.
Steve
From sturner at MIT.EDU Mon Jun 12 10:34:58 2006
From: sturner at MIT.EDU (Stephen Turner)
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 10:34:58 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] 3.6.x: http/https with the same RT instance?
In-Reply-To: <1149897855.8584.295.camel@hex.latis.com>
References: <1149897855.8584.295.camel@hex.latis.com>
Message-ID: <6.2.3.4.2.20060612103146.0394f488@po14.mit.edu>
At Friday 6/9/2006 08:04 PM, Ole Craig wrote:
>Is it possible to provide http and https access to the same RT instance
>without running completely separate configuration trees and mason
>caches?
>
>I have a setup now where the only difference between the http instance
>and the https instance is that the former is defined within a
> container and the latter is within a _default_:443> container. Most things seem to work seamlessly; the only
>exception (and it's a doozy) I've found so far is the "create" button
>from the "new ticket in ___ queue" screen. Is there a reason this button
>needs to force a canonical URL instead of using a relative?
>
>The reason I'd like to provide plaintext http is to avoid the SSL
>performance hit for internal users, but I'd like external users to be
>able to connect securely. Do I really need a duplicate setup to do that?
I'd be really surprised if SSL caused so much of a difference in
performance that it would be worth the effort of figuring out and
maintaining this setup. Do you have any measurements for the performance "hit"?
Steve
From JSpeicher at teksecurelabs.com Mon Jun 12 10:41:32 2006
From: JSpeicher at teksecurelabs.com (Speicher, Joshua (TekSecure Labs))
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 10:41:32 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] RTx Statistics Segmentation Faul
Message-ID: <46DB0FCB24C6914A91AB9184978D6A410372DE@cosmo.tekmarkinc.com>
I'm getting a child pid #### exit signal Segmentation fault (11) in our
Apache error_log whenever we try to view a graph with RTx::Statistics.
Did troubleshooting to rule out GD::Graph and GD overall. The samples
for GD::Graph work and I'm only getting the Segmentation fault when I
try to view statistics in RT. Something with the graphs is causing the
issue, any ideas?
Running:
Apache 1.3.36
PHP 4.4.2
Gd 2.0.28
Perl 5.8.8
Mod_perl 1.29
GDGraph 1.43
Joshua Speicher
Web Developer
TekSecure Labs (sm)
(a division of Tekmark Global Solutions)
www.teksecurelabs.com
This message is for the designated recipient only and it, as well as any
attachments, may contain privileged, proprietary or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, copy or
distribute it. Please notify the sender immediately and delete the
original at once. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. Thank
you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is for the designated recipient only and it, as well as any attachments, may contain privileged, proprietary or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, copy or distribute it. Please notify the sender immediately and delete the original at once. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. Thank you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From kfh at mqsoftware.com Mon Jun 12 11:17:53 2006
From: kfh at mqsoftware.com (Kelly F. Hickel)
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 10:17:53 -0500
Subject: [rt-users] RTx Statistics Segmentation Faul
Message-ID: <63BEA5E623E09F4D92233FB12A9F79431C72DF@emailmn.mqsoftware.com>
What version of RT? Do you get any sort of information about what's
actually faulting? Httpd? Gd, etc.....?
--
Kelly F. Hickel
Senior Software Architect
MQSoftware, Inc
952.345.8677
kfh at mqsoftware.com
________________________________
From: rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com
[mailto:rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Speicher,
Joshua (TekSecure Labs)
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 9:42 AM
To: rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: [rt-users] RTx Statistics Segmentation Faul
I'm getting a child pid #### exit signal Segmentation fault (11) in our
Apache error_log whenever we try to view a graph with RTx::Statistics.
Did troubleshooting to rule out GD::Graph and GD overall. The samples
for GD::Graph work and I'm only getting the Segmentation fault when I
try to view statistics in RT. Something with the graphs is causing the
issue, any ideas?
Running:
Apache 1.3.36
PHP 4.4.2
Gd 2.0.28
Perl 5.8.8
Mod_perl 1.29
GDGraph 1.43
Joshua Speicher
Web Developer
TekSecure Labs (sm)
(a division of Tekmark Global Solutions)
www.teksecurelabs.com
This message is for the designated recipient only and it, as well as any
attachments, may contain privileged, proprietary or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, copy or
distribute it. Please notify the sender immediately and delete the
original at once. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. Thank
you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is for the designated recipient only and it, as well as any
attachments, may contain privileged, proprietary or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, copy or
distribute it. Please notify the sender immediately and delete the
original at once. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. Thank
you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From JSpeicher at teksecurelabs.com Mon Jun 12 11:31:25 2006
From: JSpeicher at teksecurelabs.com (Speicher, Joshua (TekSecure Labs))
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 11:31:25 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] RTx Statistics Segmentation Faul
In-Reply-To: <63BEA5E623E09F4D92233FB12A9F79431C72DF@emailmn.mqsoftware.com>
Message-ID: <46DB0FCB24C6914A91AB9184978D6A410372E0@cosmo.tekmarkinc.com>
RT 3.4.5. And I have no idea what is actually faulting. I'm seeing
some warnings in rt.log about uninitialized values.
Example:
[warning]: Use of uninitialized value in string eq at
/opt/rt3/share/html/RTx/Statistics/Elements/Tabs line 58.
(/opt/rt3/lib/RT.pm:287)
[warning]: Use of uninitialized value in join or string at
/opt/rt3/share/html/RTx/Statistics/DayOfWeek/index.html line 64.
(/opt/rt3/lib/RT.pm:287)
[warning]: Use of uninitialized value in substitution (s///) at
/opt/rt3/share/html/RTx/Statistics/Elements/CollectionAsTable/Row line
102. (/opt/rt3/lib/RT.pm:287)
So I'm not sure what exactly is failing, I just know that it is directly
related to drawing graphs.
________________________________
From: Kelly F. Hickel [mailto:kfh at mqsoftware.com]
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 11:18 AM
To: Speicher, Joshua (TekSecure Labs); rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: RE: [rt-users] RTx Statistics Segmentation Faul
What version of RT? Do you get any sort of information about what's
actually faulting? Httpd? Gd, etc.....?
--
Kelly F. Hickel
Senior Software Architect
MQSoftware, Inc
952.345.8677
kfh at mqsoftware.com
________________________________
From: rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com
[mailto:rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Speicher,
Joshua (TekSecure Labs)
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 9:42 AM
To: rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: [rt-users] RTx Statistics Segmentation Faul
I'm getting a child pid #### exit signal Segmentation fault (11) in our
Apache error_log whenever we try to view a graph with RTx::Statistics.
Did troubleshooting to rule out GD::Graph and GD overall. The samples
for GD::Graph work and I'm only getting the Segmentation fault when I
try to view statistics in RT. Something with the graphs is causing the
issue, any ideas?
Running:
Apache 1.3.36
PHP 4.4.2
Gd 2.0.28
Perl 5.8.8
Mod_perl 1.29
GDGraph 1.43
Joshua Speicher
Web Developer
TekSecure Labs (sm)
(a division of Tekmark Global Solutions)
www.teksecurelabs.com
This message is for the designated recipient only and it, as well as any
attachments, may contain privileged, proprietary or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, copy or
distribute it. Please notify the sender immediately and delete the
original at once. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. Thank
you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is for the designated recipient only and it, as well as any
attachments, may contain privileged, proprietary or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, copy or
distribute it. Please notify the sender immediately and delete the
original at once. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. Thank
you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is for the designated recipient only and it, as well as any attachments, may contain privileged, proprietary or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, copy or distribute it. Please notify the sender immediately and delete the original at once. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. Thank you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From JLim at netopia.com Mon Jun 12 11:35:11 2006
From: JLim at netopia.com (Lim, Justin)
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 11:35:11 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] scrip order
Message-ID: <681060E80F66FC44BE343998E96178BC026C56BB@mxma2.corp.netopia.com>
I am trying to do 2 things when a ticket is created.
first is to extract some of the content and input it into custom fields
then sends an auto response with the contents of the custom fields.
I have renamed the templates and script names in alphabetical order but
the auto response is still being sent before the custom fields are
extracted so the auto response is sending out blank fields.
is there any other way of doing this ?
Thanks
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From glug2005 at lsd.za.com Mon Jun 12 11:46:12 2006
From: glug2005 at lsd.za.com (Stefan Lesicnik)
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:46:12 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] Persistent Sessions
Message-ID: <448D8C44.1000201@lsd.za.com>
Hi Guys,
I hope someone can help me. I have two computers both running Gentoo
Linux, PHP 5.1.2 / 5.1.4, perl 5.8.8, perl fcgi 0.67 and RT 3.4.5.
The one machine is using perl, the other using fastcgi. I am
experiencing pretty much the same problem on both machines. I log into
the system fine, and when I click on a menu option, i get returned to
the login page. I have tried this both from Mozilla Firefox and IE.
The machine running fastcgi seems a lot better, and I only get returned
to login when i click on the general queue and select a ticket in the
queue. The other machine running perl returns me to the login page if i
click anything.
Below is the output of the access log. No errors are logged anywhere
else in the apache log files.
196.2.124.251 - - [12/Jun/2006:15:50:15 +0200] "POST / HTTP/1.1" 200 9486
196.2.124.251 - - [12/Jun/2006:15:50:17 +0200] "GET /NoAuth/webrt.css
HTTP/1.1" 200 12658
196.2.124.251 - - [12/Jun/2006:15:50:19 +0200] "GET /NoAuth/printrt.css
HTTP/1.1" 200 696
196.2.124.251 - - [12/Jun/2006:15:50:27 +0200] "GET /Search/Build.html
HTTP/1.1" 200 2875
196.2.124.251 - - [12/Jun/2006:15:50:27 +0200] "GET /NoAuth/webrt.css
HTTP/1.1" 200 12658
196.2.124.251 - - [12/Jun/2006:15:50:28 +0200] "GET /NoAuth/printrt.css
HTTP/1.1" 200 696
Anyone got any ideas. I used to run 3.4.4 and it worked. I have
reinstalled the OS, so i am not sure going back to 3.4.4 would really
work, but if necessary, i could try it.
tia
Stefan
From sturner at MIT.EDU Mon Jun 12 11:57:31 2006
From: sturner at MIT.EDU (Stephen Turner)
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 11:57:31 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Persistent Sessions
In-Reply-To: <448D8C44.1000201@lsd.za.com>
References: <448D8C44.1000201@lsd.za.com>
Message-ID: <6.2.3.4.2.20060612115448.03951048@po14.mit.edu>
At Monday 6/12/2006 11:46 AM, Stefan Lesicnik wrote:
>Hi Guys,
>
>I hope someone can help me. I have two computers both running Gentoo
>Linux, PHP 5.1.2 / 5.1.4, perl 5.8.8, perl fcgi 0.67 and RT 3.4.5.
>
>The one machine is using perl, the other using fastcgi. I am
>experiencing pretty much the same problem on both machines. I log into
>the system fine, and when I click on a menu option, i get returned to
>the login page. I have tried this both from Mozilla Firefox and IE.
>
>The machine running fastcgi seems a lot better, and I only get returned
>to login when i click on the general queue and select a ticket in the
>queue. The other machine running perl returns me to the login page if i
>click anything.
>
>Below is the output of the access log. No errors are logged anywhere
>else in the apache log files.
We have this problem on 3.4.2 so I'm not sure if it's specific to an
RT version. Have you tried Opera as a brower. For me, the problem
doesn't occur at all with Opera, only IE & Firefox.
Also, I think including the user & password in the URL (
"?user=myname&pass=mypass" )seemed to help.
Steve
From ocraig at stillsecure.com Mon Jun 12 12:10:45 2006
From: ocraig at stillsecure.com (Ole Craig)
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 10:10:45 -0600
Subject: [rt-users] Persistent Sessions
In-Reply-To: <448D8C44.1000201@lsd.za.com>
References: <448D8C44.1000201@lsd.za.com>
Message-ID: <1150128645.8584.342.camel@hex.latis.com>
On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 17:46 +0200, Stefan Lesicnik wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I hope someone can help me. I have two computers both running Gentoo
> Linux, PHP 5.1.2 / 5.1.4, perl 5.8.8, perl fcgi 0.67 and RT 3.4.5.
>
> The one machine is using perl, the other using fastcgi. I am
> experiencing pretty much the same problem on both machines. I log into
> the system fine, and when I click on a menu option, i get returned to
> the login page. I have tried this both from Mozilla Firefox and IE.
>
> The machine running fastcgi seems a lot better, and I only get returned
> to login when i click on the general queue and select a ticket in the
> queue. The other machine running perl returns me to the login page if i
> click anything.
[...]
Stefan -
Sounds like maybe a cookie issue? I had a similar problem at one
point, which turned out to be a combination of
* the presence of a couple of firefox settings and
* the absence of anything like a mind on my part.
(I'm hoping the latter condition was temporary. :-)
Under the "privacy" tab of Firefox's preferences dialogue, I had
set "allow sites to set cookies...UNLESS I have removed cookies set by
the site." During a troubleshooting session, I had explicitly removed a
cookie set by RT (because I thought I was getting a cached login.)
Because I had explicitly removed a cookie set by my RT site, firefox
wasn't setting any more cookies from them. Thus, I would get this
behavior (my actions parenthesized):
1. login page displayed
2. (enter uname/pw)
3. login to RT accepted, RT-at-a-glance page displayed
4. (click on a ticket, say #1234)
5. login page displayed
6. (mutter, grumble, enter uname/pw)
7. login to RT accepted, ticket #1234 displayed
8. (click on basics)
9. login page displayed
10. (howl, curse, excessive keyboard abuse while entering uname/pw)
11. login to RT accepted, basics for #1234 displayed
[ &etcetera ad frustratiam ]
When I unset firefox's "unless I have removed cookies set by
this site" preference, the problem went away.
--
/Ole Craig
Security Engineer
303-381-3802 (main support hotline)
303-381-3824 (my direct line)
303-381-3801 (fax)
www.stillsecure.com
. . .
From bbailey66 at metrocast.net Mon Jun 12 12:26:03 2006
From: bbailey66 at metrocast.net (Brent)
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 12:26:03 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] help with RT3 install on apache2
Message-ID: <448D959B.1070904@metrocast.net>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I'm have installed Apache/2.0.58 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.0.58 OpenSSL/0.9.8a
PHP/4.4.2 mod_fastcgi/2.4.2 mod_perl/2.0.2 Perl/v5.8.7 with Mysql on
a solaris 10 server in an effort to try to get RT3 running. However
when i try to access the RT3 site it eventually fails with a browser
error
"500 Internal Server Error" When i look at the error log for apache2 i
see the below. Does anyone know what I may be missing or know what
the below errors mean and how to fix it ?
[Wed May 31 18:53:13 2006] [warn] FastCGI: server
"/usr/local/rt3/bin/mason_handler.fcgi" restarted (pid 2721)
Can't locate Locale/Maketext/Lexicon.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
/usr/local/rt3/local/lib /usr/local/rt3/lib
/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.7/i86pc-solaris /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.7
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7/i86pc-solaris
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl)
at /usr/local/rt3/lib/RT/I18N.pm line 34.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/local/rt3/lib/RT/I18N.pm
line 34.
Compilation failed in require at /usr/local/rt3/lib/RT.pm line 29.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/local/rt3/lib/RT.pm line 29.
Compilation failed in require at /usr/local/rt3/bin/webmux.pl line 42.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/local/rt3/bin/webmux.pl line 42.
Compilation failed in require at /dev/fd/3 line 28.
[Wed May 31 18:53:13 2006] [warn] FastCGI: server
"/usr/local/rt3/bin/mason_handler.fcgi" (pid 2721) terminated by
calling exit with status '2'
[Wed May 31 18:53:13 2006] [warn] FastCGI: server
"/usr/local/rt3/bin/mason_handler.fcgi" has failed to remain running
for 30 seconds given 3 attempts, its restart interval has been backed
off to 600 seconds
thank you in advance
Brent Bailey
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEjZWb4JTEfu1wem8RAtC8AJ4h0R37vcRSAWiZmakSoqUDZM8ABQCfcqul
nCqsUa6jzL3JvfzjnZgM1Ac=
=DQtO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From JLim at netopia.com Mon Jun 12 12:29:46 2006
From: JLim at netopia.com (Lim, Justin)
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 12:29:46 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] scrip order
Message-ID: <681060E80F66FC44BE343998E96178BC02737949@mxma2.corp.netopia.com>
sorry for the many emails..
i have followed the steps from
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/rt/users/45172?search_string=scrip
%20order;#45172
and set the extraction scrip as user defined do something in
transaction batch mode using the
if ($self->TransactionObj->Type eq 'Create')
{ return(1); }
else
{ return(undef); }
then the autoreply stage in transaction batch.
when i look at the history of the ticket i see that it is going in the
correct order but it is returning blanks for the custom fields that i
called in my template.
my old setup was
on create extract cf's in transaction batch then autoreply on user
defined when one of the cf's matched "something"
this worked so that the autoreply could call the cf's but it kept
sending out the autoreply on every transaction
is there a way to define a user define to make it only work 1 time like
a counter ?
________________________________
From: rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com
[mailto:rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Lim,
Justin
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 10:35 AM
To: RT-Users at lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: [rt-users] scrip order
I am trying to do 2 things when a ticket is created.
first is to extract some of the content and input it into custom fields
then sends an auto response with the contents of the custom fields.
I have renamed the templates and script names in alphabetical order but
the auto response is still being sent before the custom fields are
extracted so the auto response is sending out blank fields.
is there any other way of doing this ?
Thanks
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From michael.liebman at gmail.com Mon Jun 12 13:56:27 2006
From: michael.liebman at gmail.com (Michael Liebman)
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 13:56:27 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] help with RT3 install on apache2
In-Reply-To: <448D959B.1070904@metrocast.net>
References: <448D959B.1070904@metrocast.net>
Message-ID:
On 6/12/06, Brent wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello,
> I'm have installed Apache/2.0.58 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.0.58 OpenSSL/0.9.8a
> PHP/4.4.2 mod_fastcgi/2.4.2 mod_perl/2.0.2 Perl/v5.8.7 with Mysql on
> a solaris 10 server in an effort to try to get RT3 running. However
> when i try to access the RT3 site it eventually fails with a browser
> error
> "500 Internal Server Error" When i look at the error log for apache2 i
> see the below. Does anyone know what I may be missing or know what
> the below errors mean and how to fix it ?
>
>
>
> [Wed May 31 18:53:13 2006] [warn] FastCGI: server
> "/usr/local/rt3/bin/mason_handler.fcgi" restarted (pid 2721)
> Can't locate Locale/Maketext/Lexicon.pm in @INC
It looks like you haven't installed Locale::Maketext::Lexicon. Try running:
make fixdeps
Michael
--
Michael S. Liebman m-liebman at northwestern.edu
http://msl521.freeshell.org/
"I have vision and the rest of the world wears bifocals."
-Paul Newman in "Butch Cassidy & the Sundance Kid"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From michael.liebman at gmail.com Mon Jun 12 14:44:42 2006
From: michael.liebman at gmail.com (Michael Liebman)
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 14:44:42 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] help with RT3 install on apache2
In-Reply-To: <448DB227.4080907@metrocast.net>
References: <448D959B.1070904@metrocast.net>
<448DB227.4080907@metrocast.net>
Message-ID:
[In the future, please reply to the list so everyone can benefit.]
On 6/12/06, Brent wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> - From what directory do i run "make fixdeps". Also is that a perl
> thing that could be added via CPAN ?
Run it from your RT install directory. You could install the module from
CPAN by hand, but you should make sure you have all of the modules correctly
installed. Running make fixdeps will do that for you. See the README for
more information.
Michael
--
Michael S. Liebman m-liebman at northwestern.edu
http://msl521.freeshell.org/
"I have vision and the rest of the world wears bifocals."
-Paul Newman in "Butch Cassidy & the Sundance Kid"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From joela at umn.edu Mon Jun 12 14:58:28 2006
From: joela at umn.edu (Joel Peter Anderson)
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 13:58:28 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: [rt-users] RT CLI comment problem
In-Reply-To:
References: <448D959B.1070904@metrocast.net>
<448DB227.4080907@metrocast.net>
Message-ID:
We're working on a transition from a system running RT 3.0.12 to 3.4.5 and
I've run into a problem using the RT CLI - which is important to me
because I've built a bunch of automation on top of the RT CLI commands.
As far as I've tested, all the existing CLI functionality exists ...
*EXCEPT* for adding comments. Any attempt add a comment with the CLI gets
this terse response:
# Ticket comment does not exist.
Even trying something as simple as this:
rt comment -m test 144149
# Ticket comment does not exist.
---
Is this a known problem? Is there a fix/workaround? Thanks.
-------------------------------------------------
joel anderson * joela at umn.edu * 612-625-7389
--> pager: 612-648-6823
Be a part of the Next Age of Exploration
http://www.planetary.org/
From justin at jfindlay.us Mon Jun 12 14:54:58 2006
From: justin at jfindlay.us (Justin R Findlay)
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 12:54:58 -0600
Subject: [rt-users] rt as secondary website
Message-ID: <20060612185458.GE29042@jfindlay.us>
I have a server that I would like to get rt running on but I've come to
a couple of problems that I can't resolve myself. The machine is CentOS
4.3 and I've followed the install guide for RHEL4 and have everything
installed and ready except I can't figure out how to get to the web
interface. I thought I could run it under the html document tree of one
of the virtual hosts on the box (that we control) but I can't seem to
get rt to work on a URL like http://www.example.com/path/to/rt3 and I
can't clobber the site already running on http://www.example.com.
Another option I've thought of is to run rt on the domain name of the
server, http://host.net, but the websites we host (say
http://www.website.com) in the interest of having a signed cert for
their secure web pages host them on the server's DN:
https://host.net/~website.com/secure/index.html and I don't want to
interfere with this.
I hope this makes enough sense to be understandable. I'm sure there's a
way to do it. I'm just not versed with apache and WWW enough to know
how to proceed.
Justin
From jesse at bestpractical.com Mon Jun 12 15:36:16 2006
From: jesse at bestpractical.com (Jesse Vincent)
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 15:36:16 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] RT CLI comment problem
In-Reply-To:
References: <448D959B.1070904@metrocast.net>
<448DB227.4080907@metrocast.net>
Message-ID: <20060612193615.GX8022@bestpractical.com>
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 01:58:28PM -0500, Joel Peter Anderson wrote:
>
> We're working on a transition from a system running RT 3.0.12 to 3.4.5 and
> I've run into a problem using the RT CLI - which is important to me
> because I've built a bunch of automation on top of the RT CLI commands.
>
> As far as I've tested, all the existing CLI functionality exists ...
> *EXCEPT* for adding comments. Any attempt add a comment with the CLI gets
> this terse response:
This is fixed in RT 3.60pre3.
>
> # Ticket comment does not exist.
>
>
> Even trying something as simple as this:
>
> rt comment -m test 144149
> # Ticket comment does not exist.
>
>
> ---
>
> Is this a known problem? Is there a fix/workaround? Thanks.
>
> -------------------------------------------------
> joel anderson * joela at umn.edu * 612-625-7389
> --> pager: 612-648-6823
> Be a part of the Next Age of Exploration
> http://www.planetary.org/
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
>
>
> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>
>
> We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical: http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
>
--
From joela at umn.edu Mon Jun 12 15:45:11 2006
From: joela at umn.edu (Joel Peter Anderson)
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 14:45:11 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: [rt-users] RT CLI comment problem
In-Reply-To: <20060612193615.GX8022@bestpractical.com>
References: <448D959B.1070904@metrocast.net>
<448DB227.4080907@metrocast.net>
<20060612193615.GX8022@bestpractical.com>
Message-ID:
I'm getting resistance to a pre-release; is there any way to resolve the
issue in 3.4.5?
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 01:58:28PM -0500, Joel Peter Anderson wrote:
> >
> > We're working on a transition from a system running RT 3.0.12 to 3.4.5 and
> > I've run into a problem using the RT CLI - which is important to me
> > because I've built a bunch of automation on top of the RT CLI commands.
> >
> > As far as I've tested, all the existing CLI functionality exists ...
> > *EXCEPT* for adding comments. Any attempt add a comment with the CLI gets
> > this terse response:
>
> This is fixed in RT 3.60pre3.
>
> >
> > # Ticket comment does not exist.
> >
> >
> > Even trying something as simple as this:
> >
> > rt comment -m test 144149
> > # Ticket comment does not exist.
> >
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Is this a known problem? Is there a fix/workaround? Thanks.
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------
> > joel anderson * joela at umn.edu * 612-625-7389
> > --> pager: 612-648-6823
> > Be a part of the Next Age of Exploration
> > http://www.planetary.org/
> > _______________________________________________
> > http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
> >
> > Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> > Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
> >
> >
> > Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> > Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
> >
> >
> > We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical: http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
> >
>
> --
>
-------------------------------------------------
joel anderson * joela at umn.edu * 612-625-7389
--> pager: 612-648-6823
Be a part of the Next Age of Exploration
http://www.planetary.org/
From bentlema at tdg.mobilephone.net Mon Jun 12 15:39:16 2006
From: bentlema at tdg.mobilephone.net (Mark A Bentley)
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 12:39:16 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [rt-users] Adding new system rights
Message-ID:
Hi all,
I'm trying to add a new right as documented in Chapter 10 of "RT Essentials".
We're running v3.4.5. So far I've added a lib/RT/Queue_Local.pm that looks
like this:
package RT::Queue;
use strict;
no warnings qw(redefine);
$RIGHTS = {
SeeOnDashboard => "bentlema is testing",
%{$RIGHTS},
};
1;
I also added a Group_Local.pm that looks the same with the package name
changed.
I see the new right appear in the list, but when I try to grant that right
to a group I get a result of "System error. Right not granted."
Is there something else I have to do to add a new right?
Thanks,
Mark
--
Mark A Bentley
TPR Lab Systems Support
Cingular Wireless - Redmond, WA
Email: mark.a.bentley at cingular.com
425-702-3072 (desk) / 425-702-2826 (fax)
From bbailey66 at metrocast.net Mon Jun 12 16:41:54 2006
From: bbailey66 at metrocast.net (Brent)
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 16:41:54 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Rt3.012 help
Message-ID: <448DD192.2080703@metrocast.net>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Ive been given the task of migrating our ticketing system RT 3.0.12
running on solaris 9 w/ Apache/1.3.31 (Unix) PHP/4.3.9
mod_fastcgi/2.4.2 mod_ssl/2.8.19 OpenSSL/0.9.7d & mysql
On the new server solaris 10 I already have Apache/2.0.58 (Unix)
mod_ssl/2.0.58 OpenSSL/0.9.8a PHP/4.4.2 mod_fastcgi/2.4.2
mod_perl/2.0.2 Perl/v5.8.7
ive copied the database from the old server to the new server & copied
the working dir of rt3 (/usr/local/rt3) to the new server but when i
start apache up i get a ton of error messages none of which ive been
able to resolve ..unless someone can help with the errors (BELOW) i
see...if not...
it looks as though im going to have to start from scratch ...
So is there a good howto on installing rt3.0.12 or later on solaris
10 on apache 2.0.58 that i can follow ? please ?
thank you Brent
- --------------snip of errors------------------------
here are the errors i see in apache:
[Mon Jun 12 16:37:33 2006] [warn] FastCGI: server
"/usr/local/rt3/bin/mason_handler.fcgi" restarted (pid 21954)
Can't locate Locale/Maketext/Lexicon.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
/usr/local/rt3/local/lib /usr/local/rt3/lib
/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.7/i86pc-solaris /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.7
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7/i86pc-solaris
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl)
at /usr/local/rt3/lib/RT/I18N.pm line 34.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/local/rt3/lib/RT/I18N.pm
line 34.
Compilation failed in require at /usr/local/rt3/lib/RT.pm line 29.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/local/rt3/lib/RT.pm line 29.
Compilation failed in require at /usr/local/rt3/bin/webmux.pl line 42.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/local/rt3/bin/webmux.pl line 42.
Compilation failed in require at /dev/fd/3 line 28.
[Mon Jun 12 16:37:33 2006] [warn] FastCGI: server
"/usr/local/rt3/bin/mason_handler.fcgi" (pid 21954) terminated by
calling exit with status '2'
[Mon Jun 12 16:37:33 2006] [warn] FastCGI: server
"/usr/local/rt3/bin/mason_handler.fcgi" has failed to remain running
for 30 seconds given 3 attempts, its restart interval has been backed
off to 600 seconds
[Mon Jun 12 16:33:36 2006] [error] [client 65.175.128.10] FastCGI:
incomplete headers (0 bytes) received from server
"/usr/local/rt3/bin/mason_handler.fcgi", referer: https://x.x.x.x
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEjdGS4JTEfu1wem8RAt+xAKCcteh+Jzs0hStfU1aS2gyWcquqGQCeNJa4
DIDAtsc2JTvBuWuE1aDLG28=
=43iO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From jfenner at vitamix.com Mon Jun 12 16:35:00 2006
From: jfenner at vitamix.com (Jason Fenner)
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 16:35:00 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] The "fsck.com-rt-" URI scheme
In-Reply-To: <58B1112F0EEB7349AE14A0AA46F9CEC00137ABF8@szexchange.Shopzilla.inc>
References: <58B1112F0EEB7349AE14A0AA46F9CEC00137ABF8@szexchange.Shopzilla.inc>
Message-ID: <448DCFF4.9030906@vitamix.com>
What is this URI used for in RT? How does RT use it?
Philip Kime wrote:
> I was more wondering how hard it would be to just default them to an
> "rt" scheme since it would seem to make more sense for people who have
> nothing to do with the fsck.com domain. Even RT has nothing to do with
> the fsck.com domain now since I believe it was the author's personal
> domain when it was first being developed.
>
> The at scheme is just "at", it would be nice for rt to be just "rt"
> unless you really want a scheme prefix of something else which could be
> a config file setting.
>
> As an exercise, I created an "rt" scheme and altered Record.pm,
> Ticket_Overlay.pm and URI.pm but in 3.6 REST interface, the links still
> come out as fsck.com-rt so I've either missed something or something's
> in the DB.
>
> PK
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Todd Chapman [mailto:todd at chaka.net]
> Sent: 11 June 2006 15:47
> To: Philip Kime
> Cc: RT users
> Subject: Re: [rt-users] The "fsck.com-rt-" URI scheme
>
> All tickets should have fsck.com-rt schemes. Why would that be a
> problem?
>
> -Todd
>
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 01:56:12PM -0700, Philip Kime wrote:
>
>> Will this URI scheme thing be continued in later versions of RT? I
>> remember JV saying that it probably wouldn't. I'm wondering if it's
>> worth bothering with generating patches to get rid of the hard-coded
>> "fsck.com-rt-" scheme because I need to use a lot of REST calls making
>>
>
>
>> links etc. and every ticket like comes out as "fsck.com-rt-" ...
>>
>> PK
>>
>> --
>> Philip Kime
>> NOPS Systems Architect
>> 310 401 0407
>>
>>
>
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>>
>> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com Commercial support:
>> sales at bestpractical.com
>>
>>
>> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
>> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>>
>>
>> We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical:
>> http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
>>
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
>
>
> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>
>
> We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical: http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
>
>
From pkime at Shopzilla.com Mon Jun 12 16:53:14 2006
From: pkime at Shopzilla.com (Philip Kime)
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 13:53:14 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] The "fsck.com-rt-" URI scheme
Message-ID: <58B1112F0EEB7349AE14A0AA46F9CEC00137ABFC@szexchange.Shopzilla.inc>
Well I think it's supposed to allow you to have custom URI schemes so
that you could, for example, have custom resolver code for a certain
scheme that might even pull in data from external sources or do special
things to certain Tickets etc. the default scheme for tickets results in
URIs like this
fsck.com-rt://$RT::Organization/ticket/