[rt-users] The "fsck.com-rt-" URI scheme

[Philip Kime]

I was more wondering how hard it would be to just default them to an
"rt" scheme since it would seem to make more sense for people who have
nothing to do with the fsck.com domain. Even RT has nothing to do with
the fsck.com domain now since I believe it was the author's personal
domain when it was first being developed.

The at scheme is just "at", it would be nice for rt to be just "rt"
unless you really want a scheme prefix of something else which could be
a config file setting.

As an exercise, I created an "rt" scheme and altered Record.pm,
Ticket_Overlay.pm and URI.pm but in 3.6 REST interface, the links still
come out as fsck.com-rt so I've either missed something or something's
in the DB.

PK 

-----Original Message-----
From: Todd Chapman [mailto:todd at chaka.net] 
Sent: 11 June 2006 15:47
To: Philip Kime
Cc: RT users
Subject: Re: [rt-users] The "fsck.com-rt-" URI scheme

All tickets should have fsck.com-rt schemes. Why would that be a
problem?

-Todd

On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 01:56:12PM -0700, Philip Kime wrote:
> Will this URI scheme thing be continued in later versions of RT? I 
> remember JV saying that it probably wouldn't. I'm wondering if it's 
> worth bothering with generating patches to get rid of the hard-coded 
> "fsck.com-rt-" scheme because I need to use a lot of REST calls making

> links etc. and every ticket like comes out as "fsck.com-rt-" ...
>  
> PK
>  
> --
> Philip Kime
> NOPS Systems Architect
> 310 401 0407
>  

> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
> 
> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com Commercial support: 
> sales at bestpractical.com
> 
> 
> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
> 
> 
> We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical: 
> http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html