[rt-users] Regular Expressions for Custom Field Validation in RT3.6.0
Schultz, Eric
ESchultz at corp.untd.com
Mon Jun 26 12:52:42 EDT 2006
I think that may break the regex parsing in MatchPattern() in
CustomField_Overlay.pm. Unless you are talking about doing something
like:
(?#Year)^[12]\d{3}$
becomes
(?#Year)(^[12]\d{3}$)?
Give it a try and let me know how that works for you :-)
Eric Schultz
United Online
-----Original Message-----
From: Todd Chapman [mailto:todd at chaka.net]
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 8:48 AM
To: Schultz, Eric
Cc: Nick Metrowsky; rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: Re: [rt-users] Regular Expressions for Custom Field Validation
in RT3.6.0
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 08:22:46AM -0700, Schultz, Eric wrote:
> I know what you mean, and I did something like that in my code that I
> backported from 3.5.x to 3.4.x. I added another regex field that said
> whether something was mandatory or not, where 1 is mandatory, and 0 is
> not:
>
> (?#Year)(?#0)^[12]\d{3}$ year, not mandatory
> (?#Mandatory)(?#1). anything, mandatory
> (?#postal code)(?#1)^[A-Z]{2}$ postal code, mandatory
>
> The second one is useful for a field where you want anything, don't
care
> how long or what it looks like, so long is it isn't left blank.
> Obviously, I hacked on the RT code a little that reads this stuff to
> accomodate for the second regex group.
>
> Eric Schultz
> United Online
Eric,
Why add the second regex group when you can wrap the whole
thing in ()? ?
-Todd
More information about the rt-users
mailing list