[rt-users] maintainably tagging custom fields for CSS

[Jesse Vincent]

On Aug 21, 2007, at 12:54 PM, Nicholas Clark wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 09:49:52AM +0200, Espen Wiborg wrote:
>> Nicholas Clark <nick at ccl4.org> writes:
>
>>> Mmm. Are they serious that upper case ASCII is only allowed in  
>>> nmstart and
>>> not nmchar?
>>
>> I should think not. :)
>>
>> And, indeed, http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/grammar.html section D.2
>> includes the crucial '%option case-insensitive'.  IIUC, CSS doesn't
>> really care about case, except in quoted strings.
>
> Thanks.
>
> I've attached a suggested implementation, as a diff from 3.6-RELEASE
>
> Nicholas Clark<ECF>_______________________________________________
>

Since you can have multiple CSS classes for any one item, I'd think  
it would make more sense to do

customfield edit foo

rather than customfield-edit-foo


That way you could more easily theme all custom field values or all  
custom field values of a certain name, regardless of whether they're  
edit or display.

Does that seem sane?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-users/attachments/20070821/dd11c1ec/attachment.sig>