[rt-users] Is lib/RT/Queues_Overlay.pm AddRecord a bug?
Jan Grant
jan.grant at bristol.ac.uk
Sat Dec 1 08:45:22 EST 2007
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Kenneth Crocker wrote:
> Jan,
>
>
> My understanding of the "SeeQueue" and "CreateTicket" rights are that
> they are related/coupled when creating ticket via WebUI. It's the same thing
> as granting "CreateTicket" globally but also needing the email/correspondence
> address of any queue you want to create a ticket in using self-service. In
> other words, granting the "SeeQueue" right to a group for a queue accomplishes
> the same filtering effect for creating a ticket via WebUI as giving/witholding
> the email/correspond address to a queue from a user so they can/can't create
> tickets via email (unless you have given them the ability to "SeeConfigTab",
> which would be highly unlikely/unwise for someone who should only be creating
> tickets). It makes sense to me and I don't see it as broken. As to your idea
> of granting "SeeQueue" on a "group only to queue" basis sounds like the right
> approach. Nothing broken and no need for changes to code. Hope this helps.
Understood. As Todd points out:
> In more versions of RT 3.6.x (all?) you can customizer per-user what
> queues show up under Quick Search. This would be much better than
> trying to monkey with rights.
... which is ok, although we're using a customised interface that dates
from the 3.4 era. I'll look into the possibility of shifting our local
changes into a 3.6-based interface.
I'm still interested in using a new right (which we can manage for large
groups of users rather than on a per-user basis) to control the
Elements/QuickSearch selection. Is this as straightforward as I think it
should be?
Cheers,
jan
--
jan grant, ISYS, University of Bristol. http://www.bris.ac.uk/
Tel +44 (0)117 3317661 http://ioctl.org/jan/
Random act of violence against bread: whole pint.
-- extract from the "Hawk the Slayer" drinking game
More information about the rt-users
mailing list