[rt-users] mod_fastcgi or mod_fcgi, whats your expirience?

[Jesse Vincent]

Chorg Heavy Industries wrote:
> 
> 
> On 1/23/07, *Torsten Brumm* <torsten.brumm at googlemail.com
> <mailto:torsten.brumm at googlemail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi RT Users,
> 
>     who is using mod_fastcgi and who mod_fcgi? Can me tell someone the
>     pros and cons? We are still using mod_fastcgi and we have a lot of
>     problems. Did some have a good configuration example for both?? 
> 
> 
> mod_fastcgi is for  apache 1.  If you are using apache 2, then you
> should use mod_fcgid, since it is under active dev, and is much more
> stable ( under apache2 )
> 

For what it's worth, we've used mod_fastcgi with apache2 and been quite
happy with it.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-users/attachments/20070125/2316fcff/attachment.sig>