[rt-users] mod_fastcgi or mod_fcgi, whats your expirience?

[Vivek Khera]

On Jan 29, 2007, at 6:08 AM, Torsten Brumm wrote:

The FastCGI protocol needs to die.  It is very cumbersome and  
difficult to implement efficiently, and the C libraries for it are,  
shall we say, difficult to modernize.  Lately I've been recoding our  
large projects to use the new SCGI protocol.  The speedup and  
reliability and ease of implementation have dramatically improved.

> Btw. @Vivek. You wrote in another Post about performance "boost"  
> with some new indexes, but i can find this., can you repost it or  
> sent?


These were for Postgres for RT 3.2, but seem to still apply to 3.6.   
The stock indexes that come with RT are basically unused due to how  
querybuilder makes queries.



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-users/attachments/20070129/bb638130/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: rt321index.sql
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1971 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-users/attachments/20070129/bb638130/attachment.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-users/attachments/20070129/bb638130/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2530 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-users/attachments/20070129/bb638130/attachment.bin>