[rt-users] RT 4

[Jesse Vincent]

[ I'm not generally going to be trying to address folks' suggestions,  
but wanted to set one fact straight here]

On May 1, 2007, at 3:58 PM, Bob Goldstein wrote:

>> If, for the sake of argument, Best Practical were to rewrite RT, what
>> would you want to see in the new product?
>>
>

>    Do I remember correctly that some RT-ness (like checks for  
> privilege)
>    take place in the mason components?

No, that is not the case. Any access control checks done in the UI  
layer are done so as to not present people with UI for things they  
can't do.




-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-users/attachments/20070501/d170b480/attachment.sig>