[rt-users] RT 3.6.4 - Threading of comments in a ticket's history?
Drew Barnes
barnesaw at ucrwcu.rwc.uc.edu
Thu Mar 20 13:21:09 EDT 2008
I have installed Dirk Pape's fork patch and just fork a new ticket in
this instance. I then resolve the original and everything is still
preserved.
Philip Haworth wrote:
> Note: This is a second attempt to send this email after delivery
> failure without a reason given for the first attempt.
>
> Hello, I am currently testing Request Tracker in the hopes that it
> will be the Issue Tracker system that the small company I work for
> will settle with, to deal with support requests and then other uses as
> they would arise.
>
> During working on one support ticket, I came across a minor issue: At
> the moment I am storing emails from the client as Comments in the
> ticket, and I had generated a fair number of History items for the
> ticket I was working on. I found that the client had send a second
> email clarifying her original support request, straight after the
> original email had been sent - however as I wasn't aware of this email
> at the time, it hadn't been added to the ticket straight after the
> opening comment of her original email. I then used the Comment link of
> the opening comment in order to indicate that the original email has
> been superseded with this new email; entered the email in then
> submitted the Comment. Unfortunately this comment was the appended to
> the end of the History list for the current ticket - this wasn't what
> I was after.
>
> I wanted the comment I added to be displayed under the
> original comment to indicate that it was a 'reply' to the original
> comment - otherwise someone having a quick overview of the ticket
> might not realise that the client had sent a second email clarifying
> her first.
>
> Basically I'm after a threaded view of the relationship between the
> ticket comments (as used in Newsgroups), when I use the specialised
> Comment links rather than the overall ticket Comment link. Is this
> something that's in RT's settings, or is it outside the current spec
> of RT? Unfortunately I'm just a user of the system and don't have the
> knowledge to program RT itself, but I can talk to the RT administrator
> if any required code changes are easy enough.
>
> Thanks for any help.
>
> ______________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
>
>
> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
More information about the rt-users
mailing list