[rt-users] Opinions requested: RT 3.8 typefaces

[Sacha Clayton]

Alpha
Firefox 2.0.0.16 on Win XP SP3
S

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com [mailto:rt-users-
> bounces at lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Jesse Vincent
> Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 9:24 AM
> To: RT-Users Users
> Subject: [rt-users] Opinions requested: RT 3.8 typefaces
> 
> Over the weekend, Mike at westwideweb.com blogged about some issues he
> was seeing in RT's 3.8's default font choices on Windows.  When I
> asked for a bit more detail about what he was seeing, he offered up
> some screenshots to prove his point.
> 
> Without giving away what he changed, I've made up a couple static
> versions of an RT homepage. To maintain a thin veneer of 'science', I
> won't tell you what's been changed between the alpha and beta versions
> of the page.
> 
> What I would like from you, rt-users is as follows:
> 
> * If alpha renders better in your browser, reply to me personally with
> the word "alpha" as the first word of your reply.
> * If beta renders better in your browser, reply to me personally with
> the word "beta" as the first word of your reply.
> * If alpha and beta look the same in your browser, please do not reply
> to this message.
> 
> When you reply, it would be helpful if you could tell me what browser
> and OS you're using.
> 
> http://fsck.com/~jesse/ab-tests/fonts/alpha/
> http://fsck.com/~jesse/ab-tests/fonts/beta/
> 
> 
> To read Mike's original post, you can visit http://xrl.us/oq6mn
> (I shortened the link because the title gives away exactly what he
> changed.)
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Jesse
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
> 
> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
> 
> 
> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com