[rt-users] new version seems lot slower with more resources

[Ruslan Zakirov]

I think you find more help on mysql performance lists. It can be
kernel (io scheduler), mysql (changes in options, degradations),
innodb (concurency issues), finally it can be cold cache.

On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Asif Iqbal <vadud3 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Older setup:
>
> RT 3.4.5 with mysql 4.0.24 and Perl 5.8.6 on V20z with 2 1.8Ghz and 4G mem
>
> mysql> select count(*) from Tickets;
> +----------+
> | count(*) |
> +----------+
> |   406311 |
> +----------+
> 1 row in set (0.25 sec)
>
> Newer setup:
>
> RT 3.8.2 with mysql 5.0.75 and Perl 5.8.8 on T1000 with 24 1Ghz cpu threads
> and 16GB mem
>
> mysql> select count(*) from Tickets;
> +----------+
> | count(*) |
> +----------+
> |   401576 |
> +----------+
> 1 row in set (2.02 sec)
>
>
> As you can see it is really slow
>
> Here is my my.cnf file
>
> [client]
> port            = 3306
> socket          = /tmp/mysql.sock
> [mysqld]
> port            = 3306
> socket          = /tmp/mysql.sock
> skip-locking
> key_buffer = 1G
> max_allowed_packet = 50M
> table_cache = 512
> sort_buffer_size = 4M
> read_buffer_size = 2M
> read_rnd_buffer_size = 256K
> net_buffer_length = 2K
> thread_stack = 128K
> server-id       = 1
> skip-federated
> innodb_data_home_dir = /var/opt/csw/mysql5/
> innodb_data_file_path = ibdata1:2000M;ibdata2:50M:autoextend
> innodb_log_group_home_dir = /var/opt/csw/mysql5/
> innodb_log_arch_dir = /var/opt/csw/mysql5/
> innodb_buffer_pool_size = 1G
> innodb_additional_mem_pool_size = 20M
> innodb_log_file_size = 250M
> innodb_log_buffer_size = 20M
> innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit = 2
> [mysqldump]
> quick
> max_allowed_packet = 50M
> [mysql]
> no-auto-rehash
> safe-updates
> [isamchk]
> key_buffer = 256M
> sort_buffer_size = 256M
> read_buffer = 2M
> write_buffer = 2M
> [myisamchk]
> key_buffer = 256M
> sort_buffer_size = 256M
> read_buffer = 2M
> write_buffer = 2M
> [mysqlhotcopy]
> interactive-timeout
>
>
>
> --
> Asif Iqbal
> PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
>
>
> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>



-- 
Best regards, Ruslan.