[rt-users] RT 3.8 mangles html attachment

[Todd Chapman]

On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Tom Lahti <toml at bitstatement.net> wrote:
>> Todd and I got further into it. We're using Encode::Guess, which should
>> handle this. Todd had some promising places to dig for a bug.
>
> Curious: does Encode::Guess handle UTF-16(LE|BE) without a byte order mark?
>  That would be ... fascinating.
>

No it doesn't. I think the problem is the RT code splits the message
into lines and processes each line separately. Only the first line has
the BOM (Byte Order Mark) so the conversion fails on the rest of the
lines.


>
> --
> -- ============================
>   Tom Lahti
>   BIT Statement LLC
>
>   (425)251-0833 x 117
>   http://www.bitstatement.net/
> -- ============================
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
>
>
> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>