[rt-users] RT Login Page with SSL

[Jo Rhett]

Let's be clear about this.  Back in 1995 when we were using sun4m and  
P90s with 16mb of RAM, SSL was a problem.  More than 100 SSL users and  
the machine would suffer a bit.

Do you have 10-year old machines?   Do you have more than 100  
concurrent users?  (at the same time?)

If both of these aren't true, you won't have any problems with SSL  
trust me ;-)  My personal colo box is a bit outdated -- it's 1.67g  
with 1gig of RAM, and it is currently handling 200-250 concurrent SSL  
sessions without breaking 2% CPU.

On Jan 23, 2009, at 7:05 AM, Eliezer E Chávez wrote:
> CPU Time, with ssl i'm going to expend so much machine resources...
>
> Regards,
>
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 10:32 AM, <jmoseley at corp.xanadoo.com> wrote:
> The easiest thing for you to do is have the entire site in SSL.  Is  
> there a
> particular reason you only want the login credentials passed using  
> secure
> sockets layer?
>
>
> James Moseley
>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Eliezer E Chávez
> +58-416-6125676
> eliezer.chavez at gmail.com
> >>http://www.bumeran.com.ve/cv/eliezer-chavez
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
>
>
> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com

-- 
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source  
and other randomness


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-users/attachments/20090126/17f6f225/attachment.htm>