[rt-users] Problem RTIR Installation -- CPAN's GnuPG::Interface tests failing

[Behzad Mahini]

Results of 'prove -bv t/some_failing_test' (for all of the failed  
cases).. Based on what I am seeing in the following output, I'll wait  
for your response before I try Jesse's suggestion about the dev  
release (GnuPG-Interface-040.x Devel version).


=========
$ sudo prove -bv t/encrypt.t
t/encrypt.t ..
1..3
ok 1
gpg: WARNING: unsafe permissions on homedir `test'
ok 2
ok 3
ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=3,  1 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr  0.00 sys +  0.08 cusr   
0.03 csys =  0.13 CPU)
Result: PASS
=========


=========
$ sudo prove -bv t/get_public_keys.t
t/get_public_keys.t ..
1..3
gpg: WARNING: unsafe permissions on homedir `test'
not ok 1
not ok 2
not ok 3
subkeys fail comparison; this is a known issue with GnuPG 1.0.1 at t/ 
get_public_keys.t line 92.
Failed 3/3 subtests

Test Summary Report
-------------------
t/get_public_keys.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 3 Failed: 3)
   Failed tests:  1-3
Files=1, Tests=3,  0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr  0.00 sys +  0.06 cusr   
0.01 csys =  0.09 CPU)
Result: FAIL

=========


=========
$ sudo prove -bv t/get_secret_keys.t
t/get_secret_keys.t ..
1..2
gpg: WARNING: unsafe permissions on homedir `test'
not ok 1
not ok 2
Failed 2/2 subtests

Test Summary Report
-------------------
t/get_secret_keys.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 2 Failed: 2)
   Failed tests:  1-2
Files=1, Tests=2,  0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr  0.00 sys +  0.06 cusr   
0.01 csys =  0.09 CPU)
Result: FAIL

=========


=========
sudo prove -bv t/passphrase_handling.t
t/passphrase_handling.t ..
1..3
ok 1
ok 2
gpg: WARNING: unsafe permissions on homedir `test'
ok 3
ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=3,  0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr  0.00 sys +  0.08 cusr   
0.02 csys =  0.12 CPU)
Result: PASS
=========


-Behzad

On Sep 22, 2009, at 2:12 PM, Kevin Falcone wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 01:50:27PM -0700, Behzad Mahini wrote:
>> Here are the results of the manual install associated to "prove -lv  
>> t/
>> anythiing_that_fails"  for all of the failing tests ('perl
>> Makefile.PL' & 'make test' steps resulted in the same output as I had
>> already reported in my earlier email):
>
> Try prove -bv t/somethingthatfails.t
> I forgot there were shared libs and not just perl libs in there,
> but also, Jesse's comments about the dev release could be interesting.
>
> -kevin
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
>
>
> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com