[rt-users] Multiple doctypes/HTML Validation

[Jesse Vincent]

On Mon 28.Jun'10 at  1:23:42 -0400, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> Secondly, if the HTML doesn't validate, why bother setting strict,
> and not transitional?

I suspect that "best intentions" and "the real world" come into it.
When I get a moment, I'll probably relax our doctype to HTML5.  I'm so
happy that XHTML has been thoroughly discredited ;)

-Jesse
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-users/attachments/20100628/8e71a316/attachment.sig>