[rt-users] RT log has Group Error

[Josh Narins]

Um, I think Kevin was saying it was fixed in 3.8.8, so you could use that.



Josh Narins

Director of Application Development
SeniorBridge
845 Third Ave
7th Floor
New York, NY 10022
Tel: (212) 994-6194
Fax: (212) 994-4260
Mobile: (917) 488-6248
jnarins at seniorbridge.com
seniorbridge.com<http://www.seniorbridge.com/>

[http://www.seniorbridge.com/images/seniorbridgedisclaimerTAG.gif]

________________________________
SeniorBridge Statement of Confidentiality: The contents of this email message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain confidential or privileged information. Any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email by an unintended or mistaken recipient is strictly prohibited. In said event, kindly reply to the sender and destroy all entries of this message and any attachments from your system. Thank you.
From: rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com [mailto:rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Kenneth Crocker
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 12:06 PM
To: rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: Re: [rt-users] RT log has Group Error

Kevin,

Yea. I was looking thru the list of fixes in 3.8.8 and found one that sounded an awful lot like what I'm getting. I think I'll wait for 3.10 and go with that one. Thanks.

Kenn
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Kevin Falcone <falcone at bestpractical.com<mailto:falcone at bestpractical.com>> wrote:
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 03:54:56PM -0700, Kenneth Crocker wrote:
>    To List,
>
>    I'm getting an error on my log file that I don't understand.
>
>    [Wed Sep 8 22:30:44 2010] [error]: Group::HasMember was called with an argument that isn't an
>    RT::Principal or id. It's (undefined) (/opt/rt3/bin/../lib/RT/Group_Overlay.pm:1046)
>
>    Does anyone know how this error is specifically generated? Like, was it trying to send an
>    email to someone that doesn't exist in the User Table?
>
>    I'll dig for it, but a little direction here would suffice for me to dig in the right
>    direction.
It is nearly impossible to say without more context and RT version,
but there was a bug fixed in 3.8.8 where some uses of SimpleSearch
would cause an invalid Privileged check

-kevin


RT Training in Washington DC, USA on Oct 25 & 26 2010
Last one this year -- Learn how to get the most out of RT!

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-users/attachments/20100913/584c619a/attachment.htm>