[rt-users] Address field behavior with RT 4.0.1 upgrade

[Kevin Falcone]

On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 02:48:12PM +0000, Brumm, Torsten / Kuehne + Nagel / Ham GI-ID wrote:
> has this already bin fixed or implemented already? I just read the RT Announcements up to 4.0.22 and couldn't find any hint.

No.

In 4.2, privileged triggers using a data attribute of the input, which
is something you would be able to add on using JS, so we're unlikely
to take anything for this in 4.0, since it wouldn't be fixing a bug.

-kevin

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com [mailto:rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com] Im Auftrag von Thomas Sibley
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 12. Juli 2011 23:44
> An: rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
> Betreff: Re: [rt-users] Address field behavior with RT 4.0.1 upgrade
> 
> On 07/12/2011 04:10 PM, Max Hetrick wrote:
> > Is there a way to limit the Autocomplete to only search for privileged
> > users in the system?
> 
> The autocomplete code has logic for doing this, but it's not exposed as a configuration option and is only used internally in certain parts of the admin UI where it makes sense to have only privileged users.  We'd certainly take a small patch to expose it in the config as well.
> 
> I believe we mean to do this for a future 4.0.x release.
> 
> > But, I see no place or how to make this go back to the old way of a "text" field.
> 
> Additionally, we might take a patch to make the entire feature enabled/disabled at the config level, but that would be a little bit more work.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 221 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-users/attachments/20141009/6744cb60/attachment.sig>