[rt-users] Maximum recipients allowed
Olivier Lumineau
olivier.lumineau at renater.fr
Tue Feb 3 11:37:55 EST 2015
Le 19/05/2014 15:02, ktm at rice.edu a écrit :
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 02:41:19PM +0200, Olivier Lumineau wrote:
>> Hi,
>> we are using RT 3.8.7, and to filter spam more efficiently, I wanted
>> to know if there was an easy way in RT to limit ticket recipients
>> (to + cc + bcc) .
>>
>> I don't want more than 10 or 15 recipients by ticket, to prevent
>> that a spam withs hundreds mail addresses pollute our RT.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> --
>> Olivier
>>
> Hi Olivier,
>
> I used the following in Email_Local.pm. Maybe you can do something similar.
>
> Regards,
> Ken
> -----------------------
> sub ParseCcAddressesFromHead {
> my %args = (
> Head => undef,
> QueueObj => undef,
> CurrentUser => undef,
> @_
> );
>
> my @recipients =
> map lc $_->address,
> map Email::Address->parse( $args{'Head'}->get( $_ ) ),
> qw(To Cc);
>
> my @res;
> foreach my $address ( @recipients ) {
> $address = $args{'CurrentUser'}->UserObj->CanonicalizeEmailAddress( $address );
> next if lc $args{'CurrentUser'}->EmailAddress eq $address;
> next if lc $args{'QueueObj'}->CorrespondAddress eq $address;
> next if lc $args{'QueueObj'}->CommentAddress eq $address;
> next if RT::EmailParser->IsRTAddress( $address );
>
> push @res, $address;
> }
>
> #
> # Limit the number of Cc addresses that we add to a
> # ticket during the initial create to minimize damage
> # to our Email reputation when SPAM slips through DSPAM.
>
> $RT::Logger->debug("$#res Ccs");
> if ( $#res > 3 ) {
> my @riceCc;
> my @nonriceCc;
> @riceCc = grep /rice.edu/i, @res;
> @nonriceCc = grep !/rice.edu/i, @res;
> $RT::Logger->debug("$#riceCc riceCcs, $#nonriceCc nonriceCcs");
> if ($#nonriceCc > 1) {
> @res = (@riceCc, @nonriceCc[0]);
> }
> }
>
> return @res;
> }
> -----------------------
Hi,
I upgraded my RT version to 4.2.5, and this hack Ken gave me to limit
recipients number doesn't seem to work any more... (except if I missed
something in my tests)
I didn't find any other solution and I was wondering if there was a way
to have this working in my RT version.
Thanks
--
Olivier
More information about the rt-users
mailing list