[SearchBuilder-devel] [RFC][PATCH] Pages fixes and tests for it
functionality
Ruslan Zakirov
ruslan.zakirov at gmail.com
Thu Jul 28 13:14:27 EDT 2005
On 7/28/05, Jesse Vincent <jesse at bestpractical.com> wrote:
>
> > > * the class here is a Class::Accessor. We might want to do that
> > > for Jifty::DBI too, although we might not like having methods named
> > > get and set show up.
> > -1 for Class::Accessor, just don't like this solution.
> >
> Why not? We've been having a lot of luck with how much cleaner it makes
> code feel. And it's relatively fast.
I've read all PODs for this distribution and I've changed mind - +1.
I don't like only one thing - public get() and set() method, but we
can live with it.
I also read source code of C::A and have an idea how to use it in
Record.pm for AUTOLOAD and methods precompilation, but may be it's bad
idea because of get() and set().
>
> Jesse
>
--
Best regards, Ruslan.
More information about the SearchBuilder-devel
mailing list