[Shipwright] EXTERNAL: Re: Shipwright tests failure on CentOS using Software Collections Perl

sunnavy sunnavy at bestpractical.com
Tue Dec 2 21:22:34 EST 2014


Hi Sam

Could you show me the output of the following commands?

    perldoc -l Module::Build
    perldoc -l Module::Build::Version

Thanks.

Regards
sunnavy

> On Dec 3, 2014, at 12:35 AM, Wenck, Samuel <samuel.wenck at lmco.com> wrote:
> 
> (re-sending truncated to meet mailing list limits)
>  
> Hi Sunnavy,
>  
> Here is the output using your temp dist:
>  
> [root at samdev65 Shipwright-2.4.40]# prove -lv t/01.repo_check.t
> t/01.repo_check.t ..
> 1..28
> /tmp/shipwright_backend_base_TGcmL_: exists at /root/Shipwright-2.4.40/lib/Shipwright/Backend/Base.pm line 97.
> /tmp/shipwright_backend_base_TGcmL_/inc/Module: exists at /root/Shipwright-2.4.40/lib/Shipwright/Backend/Base.pm line 100.
> /tmp/shipwright_backend_base_TGcmL_/inc/Module/Build: exists at /root/Shipwright-2.4.40/lib/Shipwright/Backend/Base.pm line 101.
> /tmp/shipwright_backend_base_TGcmL_/inc/Module/Build/Version.pm: not exists at /root/Shipwright-2.4.40/lib/Shipwright/Backend/Base.pm line 136.
> No such file or directory at /root/Shipwright-2.4.40/lib/Shipwright/Backend/Base.pm line 137.
> # Looks like your test exited with 2 before it could output anything.
> Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
> Failed 28/28 subtests
>  
> Test Summary Report
> -------------------
> t/01.repo_check.t (Wstat: 512 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
>   Non-zero exit status: 2
>   Parse errors: Bad plan.  You planned 28 tests but ran 0.
> Files=1, Tests=0,  1 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr  0.01 sys +  0.15 cusr  0.04 csys =  0.23 CPU)
> Result: FAIL
>  
>  
> Thanks, Sam
> From: sunnavy [mailto:sunnavy at bestpractical.com] 
> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 11:44 PM
> To: Wenck, Samuel
> Cc: shipwright at lists.bestpractical.com
> Subject: Re: [Shipwright] EXTERNAL: Re: Shipwright tests failure on CentOS using Software Collections Perl
>  
> Hi Sam
> 
> Sadly that I can't reproduce this locally. I made a temp dist with more debug info, could you
> try the attached version and run the test(t/01.repo_check.t) again?
> 
> 
> 
> Regards
> sunnavy
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Shipwright mailing list
> Shipwright at lists.bestpractical.com
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shipwright



More information about the Shipwright mailing list