[svk-devel] [PATCH] Verbose commits (includes ? files in commit
log)
John Peacock
jpeacock at rowman.com
Tue Jun 5 16:37:51 EDT 2007
Sartak wrote:
> So in summary the options are:
> 1. leave the behavior as I wrote it
> 2. get rid of the -v flag and include unversioned files by default
> 3. add an empty line between commit targets and unversioned files
> 4. add a second header between commit targets and unversioned files
>
> I'll be happy no matter which way we go on this. #1 is less useful
> since people specifically have to remember to include -v (there isn't
> a "default switches" config anywhere is there?). #2 doesn't sit right
> with me.
I think it is much easier to explain that the text "below the line" is
equivalent to that displayed by 'svk st' on the commandline. I would
rather see the unversioned files listed inline and have a two line
"banner" which explains that you can delete lines to prevent those files
from being committed, or change the ? to A to add the files.
Personally, I have [often] forgotten to commit a new file to the
repository when working on a new feature. Normally, I cancel out of the
commit - rather than commit half the job - and add those missing files
before committing again. It would be a huge improvement to give me the
ability to fix that particular mistake /en passant/...
John
--
John Peacock
Director of Information Research and Technology
Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group
4501 Forbes Boulevard
Suite H
Lanham, MD 20706
301-459-3366 x.5010
fax 301-429-5748
More information about the svk-devel
mailing list