[svk-devel] [PATCH] Verbose commits (includes ? files in commit log)

[Jesse Vincent]

On Jun 5, 2007, at 4:01 PM, Chia-Liang Kao wrote:

> On 05/06/07, David Glasser <glasser at mit.edu> wrote:
>> On 6/5/07, Sartak <sartak at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I just finished writing a new option for svk commit, verbose, which
>> > will include ? files (aka unversioned files) in the commit log. It
>> > also has tests.
>> >
>> > The commit handler totally ignores these ? files. Maybe in the  
>> future
>> > I'll try making it so if you manually change the ? to A, it'll
>> > transparently do an svk add for that file. We'll see!
>>
>> Interesting feature!
>>
>> I'm not sure verbose is the most natural name though, since that  
>> might
>> go for more traditional "extra output" later if we come up with a
>> use... how about --show-ignores or something?  (One of these days
>> somebody will write the "default flags for svk commands" feature... I
>> think there was a patch for this a while back?)
>
> I think perhaps this can even be the default behaviour, and also it's
> arguably backward compatible.  What do people think?

+1 - this will help me stop hurting my coworkers by forgetting to add  
files while refactoring.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/svk-devel/attachments/20070605/2af43a62/PGP-0001.pgp