[svk-devel] smerge/pull with renames
Stig Brautaset
stig at brautaset.org
Wed Mar 21 11:54:59 EDT 2007
Thank you. I have commited this (with a small addition of my own) as
a TODO test (t/07smerge-rename3.t) on trunk. If somebody with more
knowledge of the internals than me could have a look, I'd be delighted.
Stig
On 21 Mar 2007, at 00:52, Jason Dillon wrote:
> This isn't really complete... but it might be close:
>
> <snip>
> #!/usr/bin/perl -w
>
> #
> # Tests that smerge handles updates after renames have been made
> #
>
> use Test::More tests => 1;
> use strict;
> use File::Path;
> use Cwd;
> use SVK::Test;
>
> my ($xd, $svk) = build_test();
> our $output;
> my ($co_trunk_path, $co_trunk_rpath) = get_copath ('smerge-rename3-
> trunk');
> my ($co_branch_path, $co_branch_rpath) = get_copath ('smerge-
> rename3-branch');
> my ($repospath, undef, $repos) = $xd->find_repos ('//', 1);
> my $uuid = $repos->fs->get_uuid;
>
> # Setup the trunk
> $svk->mkdir ('-m', 'trunk', '//trunk');
> $svk->checkout ('//trunk', $co_trunk_path);
>
> # Create some data in trunk
> chdir($co_trunk_path);
> $svk->mkdir('module');
> overwrite_file('module/test.txt', '1');
> $svk->ci(-m => "test 1");
>
> # Make a copy
> $svk->mkdir ('-m', 'trunk', '//branches');
> $svk->cp(-m => 'newbranch', '//trunk', '//branches/newbranch');
> $svk->checkout ('//branches/newbranch', $co_branch_path);
>
> # TODO: Verify that newbranch/module/test.txt == '1'
>
> # Rename the module in the branch
> chdir($co_branch_path);
> $svk->move('module', 'module2');
> $svk->commit(-m => "renamed");
>
> # Make a change to trunk
> chdir($co_trunk_path);
> overwrite_file('module/test.txt', '2');
> $svk->ci(-m => "test 2");
>
> # Merge changes w/rename from trunk to branch
> $svk->smerge('//trunk', '//branches/newbranch', '--track-rename', '-
> m')
>
> # Update the branch
> chdir($co_branch_path);
> $svk->update();
>
> # TODO: Verify that newbranch/module2/text == '2'
>
> # Make another change to trunk
> chdir($co_trunk_path);
> overwrite_file('module/test.txt', '3');
> $svk->ci(-m => "test 3");
>
> # Merge changes w/rename from trunk to branch
> $svk->smerge('//trunk', '//branches/newbranch', '--track-rename', '-
> m')
>
> # Update the branch
> chdir($co_branch_path);
> $svk->update();
>
> # TODO: Verify that newbranch/module2/text == '3'
> </snip>
>
> I've no idea how to hook up text validation of content to the
> framework, so I just put in a TODO that states what it should do.
>
> The problem is for all changes to trunk/* which are made after the
> first smerge --track-rename. The first smerge --track-rename
> appears to do the right thing after svk up in the branch, but when
> new changes are made to the trunk, no combination of smerge (w/and
> w/o --track-rename) or svk pull, or svk up will get the new changes
> from trunk into the correct files in the branch. They always end
> up in the skip list.
>
> * * *
>
> BTW... why is --track-rename optional? IMO this should always be
> on... I can't think of a reason why I would want to smerge from one
> tree to another, when the target has renamed files or directories
> when I would want to not have it merge the contents of the source
> files into the new locations of the target files.
>
> Please have a look, let me know if this .t is helpful... if you
> need more input I can provide that... as I really want/need to get
> this functionality working so I can start on the huge
> reorganization of the Geronimo server/trunk tree (with out
> impacting other developers while its going on).
>
> If you can help me figure out how to run this .t too and provide
> some hints on how to replace the TODO comments with code then I can
> work on updating this testcase too.
>
> Thanks a ton... I know you are busy, but I hope you can find some
> free cycles to help me out.
>
> Cheers,
>
> --jason
>
>
>
> On Mar 20, 2007, at 2:48 AM, Chia-Liang Kao wrote:
>
>> Hi Jason,
>>
>> On 20/03/07, Jason Dillon <jason at planet57.com> wrote:
>>> FYI, I did get --track-rename to work *once*... but all changes
>>> made to the
>>> file after I renamed its parent directory in my branch have never
>>> made it.
>>
>> Sorry I haven't had much time for this lately. If you can create
>> a .t
>> file which contains how to reproduce the problem and the expected
>> behaviour, it'd help a lot. see any other .t file from the
>> distribution as example. Meanwhile, there was a recent fix about
>> copy
>> tracking at r2323. See if that fixes your problem.
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> CLK
>> _______________________________________________
>> svk-devel mailing list
>> svk-devel at bestpractical.com
>> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/svk-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> svk-devel mailing list
> svk-devel at bestpractical.com
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/svk-devel
>
More information about the svk-devel
mailing list