[svk-users] History of local changeset lost with "push -l"?

[Ruslan Zakirov]

If you mean that changes are merged as one revision instead of many
then yes, it's done on purpose. You can use either smerge with -I
option or push without --lump option which described pretty clear in
`svk push --help`.

On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 7:26 PM, Marko Kaening <mk362 at mch.osram.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in case I locally push all my recent changes to a copy of my repo up to
> the original repo with
>
>        push -l
>
> it seems that I do loose the intermediate steps in the original repo.
>
> Only the local copy contains all intermediate steps.
>
> Is this indeed correct?
> _______________________________________________
> svk-users mailing list
> svk-users at lists.bestpractical.com
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/svk-users
>



-- 
Best regards, Ruslan.