[rt-users] Re: RT & apache2

Thu Dec 2 00:16:55 EST 2004

seph wrote:
>>>No, it works fine. Been running it on Apache 2 for months. Just mod_perl
>>>isn't as stable as it should be on Apache2.
>>
>>Aw. How unstable is it?
> 
> 
> Even easier with fast_cgi
What is easier with fast_cgi then with mod_perl?

My tests shown that if Apache is 1.xx then FastCGI is better.
1) FCGI is faster then MP1, perfomance boost is around 10-15%.
2) You have to build MP1 static usually.
3) Didn't test memory usage a lot.

Autrijus Tang said that with Apache2 MP2 has the same speed as FCGI but
use _less_ memory.

Also want to say that MP2 works fine as DSO so you don't need to rebuild 
Apache if you want rebuild MP2 or/and perl.

> 
> seph
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
> 
> Be sure to check out the RT wiki at http://wiki.bestpractical.com