[SearchBuilder-devel] [RFC][PATCH] Pages fixes and tests for it functionality

[Ruslan Zakirov]

On 7/28/05, Jesse Vincent <jesse at bestpractical.com> wrote:
> 
> > >    * the class here is a Class::Accessor.  We might want to do that
> > > for Jifty::DBI too, although we might not like having methods named
> > > get and set show up.
> > -1 for Class::Accessor, just don't like this solution.
> >
> Why not? We've been having a lot of luck with how much cleaner it makes
> code feel. And it's relatively fast.
I've read all PODs for this distribution and I've changed mind - +1.
I don't like only one thing - public get() and set() method, but we
can live with it.

I also read source code of C::A and have an idea how to use it in
Record.pm for AUTOLOAD and methods precompilation, but may be it's bad
idea because of get() and set().

> 
> Jesse
> 


-- 
Best regards, Ruslan.