[rt-devel] Re: SetEnvelopeTo

Charlie Brady charlieb at aurema.com
Thu Apr 6 22:43:17 EDT 2000

On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, Jesse wrote:

> Cool!
> Perhaps, SetRecipients should take
> %args = ( To => undef,
> 	  Cc => undef,
> 	  Bcc =>undef,
> 	  EnvelopeTo => undef);
> and do the right thing with setting envelope-to to the sum of To,Cc and Bcc.

Why? Setting envelope-to to a union of To, Cc and Bcc is precisely what
any RFC822 compliant MTA does, so why should we duplicate it? OTOH, if we
are managing the envelope-to, then why do we need Bcc, since the MTA will 
delete that header, and ignore the others?


Charlie Brady
Aurema Pty Ltd
 PO Box 305, Strawberry Hills, NSW 2012, Australia
Email:charlieb at aurema.com, Tel: +61 2 9698 2322, Fax: +61 2 9699 9174
  "I think it would be a good idea." Gandhi, on Western Civilisation.

More information about the Rt-devel mailing list