[rt-devel] Archives of closed calls

Jesse Vincent jesse at bestpractical.com
Sat Jan 5 17:31:24 EST 2002

On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 04:37:25PM -0500, John Stoffel wrote:
> And I'm not convinced that 2.0 is ready yet either.  I want to
> upgrade, but it's not a simple process when you have to keep upgrading
> large parts of your web server and it's infrastructure to do so.  In
> some ways I wish we didn't have to tie so closely to Apache to get the
> performance, since it's hard to make sure that I don't break other
> things when I do upgrade.

You could run RT's fastcgi handler instead of using mod_perl. I've had 
reports that it's faster _and_ uses less memory.

> John
>    John Stoffel - Senior Unix Systems Administrator - Lucent Technologies
> 	 stoffel at lucent.com - http://www.lucent.com - 978-952-7548
> _______________________________________________
> rt-devel mailing list
> rt-devel at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-devel

http://www.bestpractical.com/products/rt  -- Trouble Ticketing. Free.

More information about the Rt-devel mailing list