[Rt-devel] Bug? Imbalance in linking history
rg at progtech.net
Thu Nov 3 18:11:18 EST 2005
Todd Chapman wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 01:36:39AM +0300, Ruslan Zakirov wrote:
>>+1 about two transactions
>>But IMO we should run scrips twice, reasons:
>>1) would be consistent solution, as less exceptions we have as more
>>maintainable and refactorable our code is;
>>2) scrip in normal stage must have three context objects: ticket,
>>transaction, template; if you run scrips only for one transaction then
>>authors of the scrips have to dig additional context objects themself
>>which leads to new questions on the rt-users.
>>3) previouse behaviour is bug and if scrips follow buggy behaviour
>>then them should be changed;
> One scrip / two scrips, I'm not sure. What do you think Jesse? I
> don't want to think about working on a patch unless there is
> some agreement.
If I may voice an opinion here, I also think that for the sake of
consistency, scrips should be run for every transaction.
I can, however, think of another solution to the missing transaction:
Make the depended-on-by and referred-to-by fields either display-only or
have them create the transaction on the target object. That way it's
clear that the transaction is always on the originating end of the referral.
More information about the Rt-devel