[Rt-devel] Bug? Imbalance in linking history
jesse at bestpractical.com
Thu Nov 3 20:41:01 EST 2005
> If I may voice an opinion here, I also think that for the sake of
> consistency, scrips should be run for every transaction.
> I can, however, think of another solution to the missing transaction:
> Make the depended-on-by and referred-to-by fields either display-only or
> have them create the transaction on the target object. That way it's
> clear that the transaction is always on the originating end of the referral.
I don't quite understand. Display-only? The links are tracked in a table
al their own.
> Rt-devel mailing list
> Rt-devel at lists.bestpractical.com
More information about the Rt-devel