[Rt-devel] Bug? Imbalance in linking history
todd at chaka.net
Thu Nov 3 22:16:09 EST 2005
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 08:41:01PM -0500, Jesse Vincent wrote:
> > If I may voice an opinion here, I also think that for the sake of
> > consistency, scrips should be run for every transaction.
> > I can, however, think of another solution to the missing transaction:
> > Make the depended-on-by and referred-to-by fields either display-only or
> > have them create the transaction on the target object. That way it's
> > clear that the transaction is always on the originating end of the referral.
> I don't quite understand. Display-only? The links are tracked in a table
> al their own.
He means to make it so you can only delete a link from the Base ticket
and not the Target. See my other response...
More information about the Rt-devel