[Rt-devel] [patch] RT 3.8 bug when using Fcntl perl module

Ivan Kohler ivan-rt-devel at 420.am
Tue Apr 26 21:59:22 EDT 2011


On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 03:21:06PM +0300, Ruslan Zakirov wrote:
> Sure. Thank you for spotting and reporting.
> 
> [3.8-trunk 404c473] return back accidentally reverted change

Really sorry to continue being such a pest here, but can I ask that this 
be applied to the 4.0 branch before the 4.0 release?

(Perhaps since it got reverted and re-commited it missed the normal 
periodic merge-forward from 3.8 to 4.0?)

Thanks!

-- 
Ivan Kohler, President and Head Geek, Freeside Internet Services, Inc.
Open-source billing, ticketing and provisioning - http://www.freeside.biz/


> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Ivan Kohler <ivan-rt-devel at 420.am> wrote:
> > (commit df7a20d87c92774126ae7251c563214fc6eb82c0)
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 09:06:29PM -0500, Jesse Vincent wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 06:01:33PM -0800, Ivan Kohler wrote:
> >> > Unless I'm mistaken, I believe this was included in 3.8.8 but is missing
> >> > in 3.9.6?  Can it be applied to the 3.9 branch, too?
> >>
> >> We periodically merge forward from 3.8 to 3.9.  It'll happen again
> >> before the 4.0 release, though I don't know when it's next planned.
> >
> > Sorry to be a pest, but I was checking on this again, and found that I
> > was mistaken, it was not included in 3.8.8 and in fact was reverted a
> > few days after being commited, by ruz in
> > d27eef5a57b2d6abba96da6f93d6cbddd4e8d24b
> >
> > The commit message doesn't say anything about it (and reverts the
> > incidental spelling fixes), so perhaps it was a mistake?
> >
> > Would it be possible for this patch to be reapplied?




More information about the rt-devel mailing list