[Rt-devel] [patch] RT 3.8 bug when using Fcntl perl module

[Kevin Falcone]

On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 06:59:22PM -0700, Ivan Kohler wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 03:21:06PM +0300, Ruslan Zakirov wrote:
> > Sure. Thank you for spotting and reporting.
> > 
> > [3.8-trunk 404c473] return back accidentally reverted change
> 
> Really sorry to continue being such a pest here, but can I ask that this 
> be applied to the 4.0 branch before the 4.0 release?

This will not happen for 4.0.0

> (Perhaps since it got reverted and re-commited it missed the normal 
> periodic merge-forward from 3.8 to 4.0?)

Please provide a patch to rt-bugs against 4.0-trunk so it can be
linked to a release.

-kevin

> > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Ivan Kohler <ivan-rt-devel at 420.am> wrote:
> > > (commit df7a20d87c92774126ae7251c563214fc6eb82c0)
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 09:06:29PM -0500, Jesse Vincent wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 06:01:33PM -0800, Ivan Kohler wrote:
> > >> > Unless I'm mistaken, I believe this was included in 3.8.8 but is missing
> > >> > in 3.9.6?  Can it be applied to the 3.9 branch, too?
> > >>
> > >> We periodically merge forward from 3.8 to 3.9.  It'll happen again
> > >> before the 4.0 release, though I don't know when it's next planned.
> > >
> > > Sorry to be a pest, but I was checking on this again, and found that I
> > > was mistaken, it was not included in 3.8.8 and in fact was reverted a
> > > few days after being commited, by ruz in
> > > d27eef5a57b2d6abba96da6f93d6cbddd4e8d24b
> > >
> > > The commit message doesn't say anything about it (and reverts the
> > > incidental spelling fixes), so perhaps it was a mistake?
> > >
> > > Would it be possible for this patch to be reapplied?
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> List info: http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-devel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-devel/attachments/20110426/34eb5e69/attachment.pgp>