[Rt-devel] Development roadmap

[Robert Nesius]

On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 12:58:17PM -0500, Robert Nesius wrote:
> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Dominic Hargreaves <
> dominic.hargreaves at oucs.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 10:47:39AM -0400, Kevin Falcone wrote:
> > > If you can get a request-tracker4 packages instead of
> > > request-tracker40/request-tracker42 it would make us all very happy.
> >
> > Could you expand on how that would particularly affect you as
> > upstreams?
> >
>
> It implies stable api's and database schemas, yeah?  If RT 4.0 is RT 4.2
is
> RT 4.4 is RT4....  I'm expecting upgrades to not cause my database to blow
> up, or even change.  I'm not saying my expectations are reasonably
informed
> or accurate.  I'm just saying that's what I'd instinctively expect.  If
I'm
> wrong someone set me straight.

I accidentally sent this reply to an individual versus the list earlier.

-Rob
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-devel/attachments/20110509/9c0b3c7a/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-devel/attachments/20110509/9c0b3c7a/attachment.pgp>