[rt-users] Problem with rt-2.0.9
Jesse Vincent
jesse at bestpractical.com
Thu Dec 6 11:32:30 EST 2001
http://lists.fsck.com/pipermail/rt-users/2001-July/003241.html
http://lists.fsck.com/ has a search tool. It's a good way to find answers
to questions that get asked on the list every week or two ;)
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 10:36:42PM +1100, Deon George wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I've just upgrade my rt-2.0.7 to 2.0.9 (as well as upgrading from RH71 to
> RH72), and I've got a small problem with rt generating email messages to the
> AdminCC.
>
> (I upgraded my Postgres DB from 7.0 to 7.1 as well)...
>
> It seems from the Sendmail logs that mail is being address to 'AdminCC of
> wurley.helpdesk Ticket #nn' instead of the AdminCCs email address....
>
> This is from /var/log/maillog/maillog
> Dec 6 22:25:27 dingo sendmail[8815]: fB6BPRL08815: from=apache, size=1065,
> class=-60, nrcpts=1, msgid=<rt-53-174.6.06058011743656 at wurley.help
> desk>, relay=apache at localhost
> Dec 6 22:25:27 dingo sendmail[8815]: fB6BPRL08815: fB6BPRM08815:
> DSN: 'AdminCc of wurley.helpdesk Ticket #53':;... List:; syntax illegal for
> recipient addresses
> Dec 6 22:25:27 dingo sendmail[8815]: fB6BPRM08815: to=root, delay=00:00:00,
> xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=local, pri=30100, dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent
>
> And here is my /tmp log:
>
> RT::Action::Notify=HASH(0x9832630): Could not send mail for
> RT::Transaction=HASH(0x96d3f1c)
>
> Does this mean anything to anybody?
>
> Thanks...
> --
> Wurley Internet
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
--
http://www.bestpractical.com/products/rt -- Trouble Ticketing. Free.
More information about the rt-users
mailing list