[rt-users] machine requirements?

[Simon Thornington]

Well, I've reduced that number of httpd children to 1, to save the 11MB of
the previous four children, and the web site is picking up a bit.  I
wonder how difficult it would be to write an RT shell?

Simon.

On Thu, 27 Sep 2001, Jesse Vincent wrote:

> Part of what you're seeing is processor related. Part of it is the fact that
> RT's commandline tools have to compile/interpret RT each time they run.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 12:59:41PM -0400, Simon Thornington wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > We're running an RT 2.0.6 install on a Pentium something (not a P2+ as far
> > as I know) with Postgres.  A command-line rt summary of open tickets (of
> > which there are about 70-100) takes about 10 seconds.  Is this machine
> > simply not fast enough for an RT install, or is this the kind of response
> > times other people are getting?  What sort of hardware are people
> > installing on, and what response times do they get?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Simon.
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > rt-users mailing list
> > rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> > http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
> > 
> 
> -- 
> http://www.bestpractical.com/products/rt  -- Trouble Ticketing. Free.
>