[rt-users] machine requirements?

[Jesse Vincent]

Not terribly hard, actually. Most of the CLI tool was built to be able to do that. But it could stand some serious cleanup.




On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 02:28:44PM -0400, Simon Thornington wrote:
> Well, I've reduced that number of httpd children to 1, to save the 11MB of
> the previous four children, and the web site is picking up a bit.  I
> wonder how difficult it would be to write an RT shell?
> 
> Simon.
> 
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2001, Jesse Vincent wrote:
> 
> > Part of what you're seeing is processor related. Part of it is the fact that
> > RT's commandline tools have to compile/interpret RT each time they run.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 12:59:41PM -0400, Simon Thornington wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > We're running an RT 2.0.6 install on a Pentium something (not a P2+ as far
> > > as I know) with Postgres.  A command-line rt summary of open tickets (of
> > > which there are about 70-100) takes about 10 seconds.  Is this machine
> > > simply not fast enough for an RT install, or is this the kind of response
> > > times other people are getting?  What sort of hardware are people
> > > installing on, and what response times do they get?
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > 
> > > Simon.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > rt-users mailing list
> > > rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> > > http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
> > > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > http://www.bestpractical.com/products/rt  -- Trouble Ticketing. Free.
> > 
> 
> 

-- 
http://www.bestpractical.com/products/rt  -- Trouble Ticketing. Free.