[rt-users] Any advantage to using the other mysql tabletypes? (bdb, innodb) with RT?
Vivek Khera
khera at kcilink.com
Thu Jul 11 16:36:20 EDT 2002
>>>>> "JM" == Jaye Mathisen <mrcpu at internetcds.com> writes:
JM> just wondering if using different table types and transaction stuff might
JM> let mysql run the other pending queries from other RT users...
Not that this solves your problem, but my experience tells me that
this is where Postgres really shines -- the concurrency model with
transactions is really smart -- it does row level locking rather than
table-level, and only locks the rows you're gonna update (if you tell
it).
I switched an app from mysql to postgres and tweaked it to give
postgres the necessary hints and the concurrency went way up.
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc.
Internet: khera at kciLink.com Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8497
AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/
More information about the rt-users
mailing list